Heritage Expert

Baker Spring

  • F.M. Kirby Research Fellow in National Security Policy

Baker Spring is the F.M. Kirby Research Fellow in National Security Policy at The Heritage Foundation.

Spring specializes in examining the threat of ballistic missiles from Third World countries and U.S. national security issues. In 2005, he developed “Nuclear Games, ” a table-top exercise to show diplomats from Australia, China, India, Japan,  Russia and South Korea the realities in a world where many nations, including rogue states such as North Korea, have nuclear weapons.

Spring demonstrated how missile defense systems can strengthen stability and promote peace in such a world. Based on its success, Heritage hosted the first war-gaming exercise on energy security in December 2006. 

Spring also was instrumental in defeating the Anti-Ballistic Missile (ABM) Treaty earlier in the decade. Spring argued that the 1972 pact was worthless because the treaty’s other signing party, the Soviet Union, no longer existed – which meant that the United States could go all out and create a missile defense system.  “The ABM Treaty simply didn’t reflect today’s geopolitical realities,” Spring said in a 2002 interview. “When we signed it, Leonid Brezhnev was running the Kremlin, the Cold War was at its height, and U.S-Soviet missile were pointed at each other.”

In 2003, Spring received the prestigious Dr. W. Glenn and Rita Ricardo Campbell Award for his work. The award is given annually to the Heritage employee who delivered “an outstanding contribution to the analysis and promotion of a Free Society.”

Spring began studying missile defense issues while researching the SALT II Treaty as a Republican National Committee intern in the 1970s. He later served as a defense and foreign policy expert for Sens. Paula Hawkins (R-FL) and David Karnes (R-NE). He joined Heritage in 1989.

A graduate of Washington and Lee University, Spring received his master’s degree in national security studies from Georgetown University.

All Publications by Baker Spring
  • Issue Brief posted May 22, 2012 by Baker Spring Centralizing Management of the Military Health System

    The Government Accountability Office (GAO) released a paper last month urging the Department of Defense (DOD) to centralize the management of the Military Health System (MHS).[1] GAO has long held the view that the management structure for supervising the MHS is too de-centralized to impose the discipline necessary…

  • Issue Brief posted May 15, 2012 by Steven Bucci, Ph.D., Baker Spring Congress Should Invest in Seapower over Bureaucracy

    The U.S. House of Representatives showed strong support for national security when it voted through a reconciliation process to override the sequestration cuts scheduled for defense in January 2013. By following the House Armed Services Committee’s (HASC) lead in raising the top-line budget for defense over the…

  • Backgrounder posted May 3, 2012 by Baker Spring President Obama’s Missile Defense Program Falls Behind the Threat

    Abstract: President Barack Obama has proposed a woefully inadequate budget for missile defense for FY 2013, neglecting his duty to defend the United States against foreign military threats. This is consistent with the President’s overall neglect of missile defense and his willingness to subordinate…

  • Issue Brief posted March 31, 2012 by Baker Spring CTBT: New Study Fails to Resolve Differences over Risks to U.S. Nuclear Arsenal

    On March 30, the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) released a report that is already starting to be described as having resolved all of the technical issues surrounding the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT). Descriptions of the NAS study by CTBT advocates are certain to be…

  • Backgrounder posted March 1, 2012 by Baker Spring Obama’s Defense Budget Makes Protecting America its Lowest Priority

    Abstract: Despite Administration claims to the contrary, President Barack Obama’s budget proposal for FY 2013 would reduce national defense to the lowest of the major budget priorities of the federal government. The combination of the budget request and the Budget Control Act of 2011 would reduce the military’s personnel levels…

  • Issue Brief posted February 27, 2012 by Baker Spring, Michaela Bendikova Fail-Safe Failure? Metrics on the Nuclear Arsenal Are Inadequate

    President Obama’s fiscal year (FY) 2013 budget request uses inadequate metrics to evaluate the strategic objective to “maintain a safe, secure, and effective nuclear arsenal to deter attack on the U.S. and on our allies and partners.” Two categories being evaluated are: …

  • Backgrounder posted February 8, 2012 by Baker Spring Congress Fails to Undo President Obama’s Damage on Missile Defense

    Abstract: In passing the FY 2012 defense authorization and appropriations bills, Congress missed an ideal opportunity to reverse the damage that the Obama Administration inflicted on U.S. missile defense programs in 2010. Congress specifically failed to move the U.S. toward a more defensive nuclear…

  • WebMemo posted February 8, 2012 by Baker Spring, Michaela Bendikova The United States Must Not Concede the Russian Position on Tactical Nuclear Weapons

    In December 2010, the Senate’s resolution of ratification to the New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (New START) imposed a condition to begin a next round of arms negotiations on tactical nuclear weapons systems between the Obama Administration and Russia. It is essential that the Administration does not make concessions to…

  • WebMemo posted February 8, 2012 by Baker Spring, Michaela Bendikova Top Five Military Modernization Mistakes Congress Should Fix

    It is already clear that the U.S. capabilities necessary for meeting the nation’s global security requirements will not be met if current defense budget policies are left in place. The lack of funding will translate into a U.S. military that might not be able to control the skies, have enough…

  • Backgrounder posted January 27, 2012 by Baker Spring, Michaela Bendikova Time to Modernize and Revitalize the Nuclear Triad

    Abstract: The U.S. nuclear triad of heavy bombers, intercontinental-range ballistic missiles (ICBMs), and submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs) is aging. The nuclear testing moratorium, which has reached nearly two decades, and the required reductions under New START are magnifying questions about the U.S. nuclear arsenal’s reliability. These growing questions will eventually…