Commentary-
There should be little doubt about the direction of U.S. foreign policy in the second term of President George W. Bush, especially with respect to the Korean Peninsula. It stands to remain unchanged.
Consider the Six-Party Talks initiated by Bush in his first term to address North Korea's outlaw nuclear weapons program. In the Sept. 30 presidential debate, Sen. John Kerry said he would supplement the multilateral negotiations by conducting bilateral discussions with Kim Jong Il's regime. The president responded unequivocally. It would be a mistake, he said, to open up a separate, American/North Korean dialogue. All negotiations with Pyongyang must engage all five partner-states: South Korea, Japan, Russia, China and the United States. That way, he argued, if Kim decides not to honor any resulting agreement, "he's not only doing injustice to America, he'd be doing injustice to China [and the other negotiating partners] as well." Staying unified in a five-nation coalition is the most effective way to send a clear message to Kim. Nuclear Free Peninsula The goal of these negotiations remains unchanged, as well. Throughout the campaign, Bush repeatedly stated his firm resolve to create a nuclear-free Korean Peninsula via negotiations, and insisted that the pact provide some means to verify that, this time, Kim honors the agreement. Yes, the "Bush doctrine" calls for the use of pre-emptive force to prevent an imminent attack on the United States. But Bush has made it clear that he has no intention of initiating the use of force against North Korea. So what, exactly, should America's allies in South Korea expect during the next four years of the Bush administration?
Larry M. Wortzel is vice president for foreign policy and defense studies at The Heritage Foundation.
Appeared on DefenseNews.com