President Obama's mortgage "rescue" initiative gets only
four things wrong.
But those flaws are so major, they negate any good that the plan
would do.
Here's what's wrong:
- The plan requires homeowners who have scrimped and sacrificed
to pay their mortgages to bail out their less responsible
neighbors.
- It sends the wrong message to children about dealing with the
consequences of decisions.
- It does little to keep a major portion of the refinanced loans
from going back into default.
- It addresses only a fairly small part of the housing crisis
that has so damaged our economy.
All are serious failings, but the first is probably the
worst.
By most estimates, about 91 percent of mortgages are currently
paid on time even if homeowners have to drastically cut back on
everything else to meet their obligations.
Now the Obama administration wants to use $275 billion of
taxpayers' money to refinance the loans of people who didn't pay
their mortgages.
I am not trying to make light of the awful situation facing some
of these homeowners who got into trouble through misfortune and
other circumstances beyond their control. This is a real tragedy
for them.
However, many others in line for taxpayer assistance refinanced
their homes to pay for swimming pools, vacations and other
extravagances. Still others gamed the system to buy a house they
could never afford in the first place.
Sadly, despite the efforts of numerous politicians to be seen as
fixing the housing problem, it will only end when prices drop far
enough that young families who thought they were condemned to
perpetual renting find that they can afford a house, condo or
co-op.
There is no silver bullet or magic solution that will speed that
process along. That's especially true of government programs - such
as this one - that target only part of the problem.
David John is a senior research fellow at The Heritage
Foundation.
First Appeared in the New York Post