EDUCATION NOTEBOOK:
An Open Mind about School Choice
By Dan Lips
Anytime a liberal politician says something positive about
school vouchers, it's notable. When that politician is a
leading contender for the Democratic presidential nomination, it
merits national attention.
In a recent meeting with the editorial board of the
Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, Illinois Senator Barrack Obama
made headlines by indicating that he could possibly support school
vouchers.
The newspaper reported that, while claiming to be a skeptic,
Sen. Obama promised he would keep an open mind: "If there was any
argument for vouchers, it was 'Let's see if the experiment works,'"
Senator Obama said. "And if it does, whatever my preconception, you
do what's best for kids."
Academic studies showing that vouchers are working might
convince Senator Obama to become a supporter, or so the Journal
Sentinel reported.
The Illinois Senator deserves credit for keeping an open mind
about a controversial reform idea that is opposed by most liberal
interest groups. But apparently he is not up-to-date on the latest
education policy research. If he or his staffers had been doing
their homework, they would know that many academic evaluations have
already shown that voucher programs are working.
One such program is in Milwaukee. Originally launched in 1990,
it is now helping more than 17,600 low-income students attend
private schools, and its success has been documented by a growing
body of academic research.
The Milwaukee voucher program has undergone two
randomized-experiment evaluations. Considered the gold standard in
scientific research, these experiments compare a group of students
who were awarded vouchers through a lottery system with students
who applied but did not get vouchers. This allows researchers to
test the "treated group" with their peers who stayed in public
schools. Both academic evaluations have shown academic gains over
time for students receiving vouchers.
School choice also leads to higher graduation rates. Students in
the Milwaukee voucher program have higher graduation rates than
students in traditional public schools. Dr. John Robert Warren of
the University of Minnesota compared the graduation rates of voucher
recipients to students the city's public school system. He found
that in three out of four recent years, the graduation rate for
voucher students was significantly higher. "Overall, had MPS
graduation rates equaled those for MPCP students, the number of MPS
graduates would have been 14 per cent higher in these four years,"
Dr. Warren concluded.
Furthermore, the benefits of school choice aren't confined to
students receiving vouchers. Growing evidence suggests that public
schools are spurred to do better when families have the option of
choosing different schools for their kids. In 2001, Harvard
University Economics Professor Dr. Caroline Hoxby studied the effect of school choice options on
the performance of public schools. She found that public schools
that faced a higher degree of competition from private schools
improved their performance compared to public schools that faced
less competition. A new evaluation conducted by Federal Reserve
Bank economist Rajashri Chakrabarti has also found that competition
has led to improvement in Milwaukee public schools.
In the future, experts will know even more about how well school
choice programs are working. The Wisconsin state legislature
recently ordered that academic researchers conduct a longitudinal
study of the Milwaukee voucher program to determine how well it is
working. Georgetown University researchers are currently conducting
a similar evaluation of the school voucher program in Washington,
D.C.
But Senator Obama doesn't need to rely on academic research
alone. Parents are the best jury to decide whether choice is
working for their children. On that point, the evidence is strong.
Many surveys and focus groups have found that parents are more
satisfied with their children's learning environment when they can
choose their school. That helps to explain why limited voucher
programs are usually over-subscribed, with many kids ending up on
long waiting lists.
What's more, Senator Obama should ask the millions of low-income
families who have no choice but to send their kids to
low-performing public schools if they too would like a
voucher. In 1998, the non-profit Children's Scholarship Fund
did just that - offering private school scholarships to 40,000
low-income students across the country. In all, more than 1.2
million kids applied. In Senator Obama's hometown of Chicago,
59,000 children applied - approximately one out of every four kids
who was eligible.
It's a welcome sign that a Democratic presidential candidate is
keeping an open mind about school choice. But he need not wait for
the next round of academic research reports to understand that
school choice works. The evidence is already clear.
Dan Lips is Education Analyst at the Heritage
Foundation.