Former U.S. Secretary of Education Rod Paige uncovers the
"elephant in the room" in the current education debate in his new
book, The War Against Hope: How Teachers' Unions Hurt
Children, Hinder Teachers, and Endanger Public
Education.
For decades, union-backed education reformers have called for
more money, more teachers, and smaller classroom sizes to raise
test scores and narrow achievement gaps. Paige insists that
education reform will not be successful unless the public begins to
pay more attention to the activities of teachers' unions and
challenges the unions when their actions threaten our children's
education.
Laying out the history of teachers' unions in the United States,
Paige explains how the public education system is now under the
control of a monopoly with a singular intent: to protect its
members, regardless of performance or merit. Teachers' unions
oppose plans that empower parents to demand accountability and
choice, which they see as a threat to the jobs of underperforming
teachers. For the unions, many innovative reform proposals are just
unacceptable.
This is hardly a recent state of affairs. The National Education
Association (NEA) was founded in 1857 to improve education at the
local level. Within just a few years, it shifted its focus to
teacher pay. Today, with approximately 3.2 million members, the NEA
is one of the largest unions in the United States and has immense
political influence. According to Paige, this was no accident.
The NEA's executive director stated its goal at its 1978
convention: "to tap the legal, political and economic power of the
U.S. Congress. We want leaders and staff with sufficient clout that
they may roam the halls of Congress and collect votes and reorder
the priorities of the United States of America."
The NEA's efforts have been extremely successful. A year later,
President Jimmy Carter established the federal Department of
Education and federal spending on education has since skyrocketed.
Along with the money has come increased federal control.
Paige argues that this centralized control over education is the
key to the NEA's power. Instead of having to fight the same
battle in thousands of school districts, the NEA can go straight to
Congress, where they lobby for one-size-fits-all laws to which all
states must comply.
Due in large part to the unions' efforts, schools today suffer
stifling regulations and burdens imposed from Washington. In
addition, school leaders lack hiring and firing powers and the
ability to reward the best teachers with merit pay. They are
powerlessness to encourage teachers to use innovation and
creativity in the classroom. In this environment, reform and
experimentation are almost impossible.
Under current union regulations, writes Paige, our children are
not the only ones suffering-our teachers are as well. Due to union
rules, teachers may be rewarded based only on seniority and the
number of college courses completed. Teachers with 30 years of
experience in the classroom who lack a master's or doctorate degree
will never max out the pay scale. As Paige puts
it, "a fifteen-time 'Teacher of the Year' in physics that spends
several hours after school preparing illustrative lab
demonstrations cannot be paid as much as a home economics major
teaching with an MBA earned at night school."
The unions work hard to maintain the status quo. Paige
illustrates how politicians, especially those with ties to the
Democratic Party, have learned that crossing the NEA can lead to
damaging personal attacks and big-money opposition that can destroy
a candidate's career. Many succumb to the pressure, by either
campaigning on NEA-friendly platforms or failing to engage in the
education debate.
If politicians want to act in children's best interest,
concludes Paige, politicians' reluctance to challenge the teachers'
unions must end.
Secretary Paige seeks to encourage parents,
students, teachers, and taxpayers to demand accountability,
transparency, and choices from the education establishment. "[W]e
have a choice between two alternatives. We can choose to have
authentic school reform, or we can choose-through omission-to have
continued teachers' union dominance of school operations. We cannot
have it both ways."
Elizabeth Smitham is a policy intern at the Heritage
Foundation, www.Heritage.org.