EDUCATION NOTEBOOK:
The Future of D.C. School Choice
November 3, 2006
More than 1,800 disadvantaged children in Washington, D.C., are
now using federally funded tuition scholarships to attend private
schools. But as the scholarship program's congressional
reauthorization approaches, whether these children will have that
opportunity in the future is uncertain.
In 2004, President Bush signed legislation to create the D.C.
opportunity scholarship program, which offered tuition scholarships
worth up to $7,500 for students from families with incomes below
185 percent of the poverty line for a family of four. Students
receiving scholarships can attend any of 66 participating private
schools.
Now in its third year, the program aids 1,800 students from
families with an average income of $21,100, or 106 percent of the
poverty line. These students' families are some of the most
disadvantaged in the community.
The scholarships have proven popular among parents. According to
the Washington Scholarship Fund, the nonprofit that administers the
program, nearly 6,500 students have applied for scholarships over
the past three years, or about three applicants for each
scholarship slot. In all, about 11 percent of eligible low-income
students have applied.
So far, studies of the program's results have been encouraging.
A 2005 Georgetown University study found that many parents reported
that their children "became more confident, performed better
academically, and possessed increased enthusiasm after joining" the
opportunity scholarship program.
A 2006 Manhattan Institute report suggested that the program
would promote racial integration, as participating students would
likely use their scholarships to leave more segregated public
schools to attend more integrated private schools.
Next year, the most important evaluation of the program will be
released. This study will determine whether the program is having
an academic impact on participating children. To date, eight
similar studies have evaluated similar programs across the country,
comparing the test scores of students receiving vouchers to a
control group of peers who remained in public school. Every one of
these studies has shown some positive academic effect for
participating students.
But even positive test scores will not ensure the D.C. voucher
program's future. If the past is prologue, the voucher program
could face an uphill political battle in the next Congress when it
comes due for reauthorization.
In the last Congress, the D.C. voucher plan passed with narrow
support. The House passed the measure by a vote of 205 to 203,
splitting largely along party lines. All but 14 Republicans voted
in favor; all but four Democrats voted against.
With such a slim majority, the voucher program's future will be
in doubt no matter which party controls the next Congress. Whether
it is reauthorized will likely hinge on whether it can attract more
support from Democrats. That remains an open question.
Historically, liberals have opposed private school choice
programs. In 1998, President Clinton vetoed legislation to create a
D.C. school choice program. In all, 188 House Democrats voted
against the D.C. voucher plan. Both House Minority Leader Nancy
Pelosi (D-CA) and Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) have
consistent records of opposing vouchers.
But in recent years, a growing number of Democrats have
supported private school choice. The D.C. voucher program itself
passed thanks to support from a few prominent Democrats like
Senators Diane Feinstein (D-CA) and Joe Lieberman (D-CT) and
Representative Harold Ford (D-TN). Their support helped fuel
bipartisan support for school choice proposals
nationwide.
In 2006, a record number of Democratic
lawmakers in state capitals sponsored or supported private school
choice plans. And Democratic governors in Arizona, Iowa,
Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin have agreed to create or expand school
choice options.
The looming reauthorization debate for the
D.C. opportunity scholarship program is important because it will
force Members of Congress to affirm their position on school
choice. They will have to decide whether to end a popular program
that's helping 1,800 disadvantaged kids. Their answer will have a
big impact on the lives of these students and millions of their
peers across the nation.
Dan Lips is an Education
Analyst at the Heritage Foundation www.Heritage.org.