Now
here, you see, it takes all the running you can do to keep in the
same place. If you want to get somewhere else, you must run at
least twice as fast.
--Lewis Carroll, Through the Looking Glass
The
above quote rings in my mind as I view the latest numbers on oil
and gas production here in Oklahoma. In spite of the fact that the
number of rigs has doubled from a year ago, oil and gas production
are actually down since May. Such is the state of affairs America
faces as it tries to keep vehicles running, electricity flowing,
and furnaces lit. The policies (or lack of same) of the past and
present force us to run as hard as we can simply to stay in place.
Meanwhile, the time bomb that is the Middle East continues to tick,
and the threat of a disruption of the OPEC oil we've come to depend
on grows ever greater. With a 17-year-old son, I am watching that
situation come unraveled with great trepidation.
Like
the grasshopper in the fable of the ant and the grasshopper, we
have been given ample warnings of the impending disaster. We have
had:
-
two findings in the past eight years of a
national security threat to the United States with current levels
of oil imports,
-
a recent order from the U.S. Court of
International Trade ordering the Department of Commerce to
investigate the dumping of oil in the United States by OPEC
countries,
-
reports of a ballooning trade deficit from
oil, and
-
fear on the part of the Federal Reserve as
to what this energy crisis may do to our booming high-tech
economy.
Like
the grasshopper, America's live-for-today mentality in energy
policy has finally caught up with us. We are facing these energy
shortages in energy-rich America because we have not made it a
national priority to maintain our domestic energy infrastructure
and provide reasonable access to our resource base. To compound the
problem, the increasing energy demands of our growing economy have
been ignored.
In
the past year we have faced shortages of fuel oil, gasoline,
electricity, and this winter will face one of the tightest gas
markets seen since gas was deregulated. All consumers will face
higher prices and some may face curtailments.
The
situation is clearly a crisis, not easily or quickly solved, that
has consequences for our high-tech economy. And with the unrest in
the Middle East, this lack of foresight poses a threat to our
national security that has been outlined in two separate
presidential findings.
Why
can't we just continue to stumble along from energy crisis to
energy crisis like we have been doing over the last several years?
The ill-advised and possibly illegal release from the Strategic
Petroleum Reserve doesn't address the fact that America's energy
infrastructure and resource base is being shut down, and this, in
turn, is causing a crisis from the gas pump to the electric meter.
In fact, it would be almost laughable in its naivete as a policy
solution if it wasn't so clear that it was political in nature,
geared towards an American public kept in the dark about the true
state of our energy crisis.
The
domestic oil industry is in shambles. First, OPEC's recent increase
means they have lifted supply this year by 3.2 million barrels a
day, putting their total production back to 1998 levels, when world
prices fell to $8 a barrel. The latest increase in production is
having little impact on prices because U.S. and other marginal oil
production are gone and demand has increased. We are approaching 60
percent dependency on foreign imports of crude oil used for heating
oil and transportation. This is in comparison to the 42 percent
dependency we faced less than 10 years ago.
In
the previous 20 years, imports increased only 10 percent. The
domestic industry has lost hundreds of thousands of jobs and well
over one million barrels a day of production. That means over
10,000 supertankers a year entering American ports with crude oil
going to refineries, many now located on the coasts of America.
Once
refined, it has to be put in batches, made up of as many as 30
different gasoline formulas as required by law, and then put into
pipelines to be shipped all across the country in quantities the
local markets demand. Again, that is in comparison to the less than
half a dozen formulas required to be shipped through those same
pipelines less than 10 years ago. Most of these pipelines were
built in the 1950s.
Domestic oil production onshore has fallen
off to historic lows with the price drop to $8 a barrel, and 50 out
of 200 refineries have closed, many located in the Midwest. A new
refinery has not been built in a quarter of a century. In the PADD
region (Petroleum Administration for Defense District) that faced
all those shortages and price spikes (including Oklahoma), only 70
percent of the gasoline used is produced and refined in the region
now. The Environmental Protection Agency is also proposing new
regulations on the production of diesel fuel that will encourage
the shutting down of additional domestic refineries.
Although not widely discussed, the oil
crisis has had a dramatic impact on American natural gas
production; over 90 percent of what we use is produced in America.
In fact, there is little additional natural gas capacity that can
be imported since Canada is our only significant importer. While
they may have added pipeline capacity, it will be hard to increase
gas production to the United States until they bring on the
McKenzie Delta Field. And because over 70 percent of natural gas is
produced by independent producers who raise their capital for
exploration and production from existing oil and gas production
income, when there is no income, no gas wells get drilled either.
That basically put us over two years behind in replacing reserves,
much less meeting new demand.
So
what is the problem now that prices have increased? A lack of
confidence by the oil and gas industry that OPEC won't pull the rug
out again is part of the problem. It is all about certainty. While
the rig count is increasing--there are close to 800 rigs drilling
for natural gas--it is not nearly enough. To replace existing
reserves and meet new demand may require close to 2,000 rigs. There
are not that many rigs available in the United States, few new
onshore rigs are being built, and even if we had the rigs there are
not enough qualified people to man them.
According to statistics compiled by the
Oklahoma Corporation Commission, natural gas production in
Oklahoma, the third largest gas producing state, has still
increased by only 1 percent over 1999. The good news is that
intents to drill are up 40 percent over last year, and in Texas
they are up 60 percent. But it usually takes an average of three
years to develop on-shore projects. Gas supplies are likely to be
short this winter because we are two years behind in drilling to
replace reserves, and that is not even counting what we need to
meet greater demand.
A
recent National Petroleum Council report recommends that access to
supply for exploration and production must increase, especially on
federal lands. It estimates that 137 trillion cubic feet (TCF) in
the Rockies and another 76 TCF offshore in the eastern Gulf of
Mexico, Atlantic, and Pacific coasts, which are directly or
effectively off limits, could supply American consumers.
Alaska has tremendous gas supplies, but we
have no pipeline to bring it to the lower 48 states. It must be
made a national priority to build one. Cambridge Energy Research
Associates estimates that, at a minimum, the petroleum industry
will need to add 50 percent more gas reserves over the next decade
than they were finding in the 1990s. Approximately a $1.5 trillion
(in constant dollars) investment in production through 2015 will be
required to meet estimated demand.
What
does this have to do with the electricity shortages? The same lack
of adequate infrastructure and the accompanying necessary energy
production also lie at the root of this shortage. The demand for
electricity generated by the new age of technology has not been
recognized and planned for anywhere in the United States.
Usage of the Internet now comprises 8
percent of our electricity demand. But there is no place where
government barriers and bad planning is more evident than in
California, where it takes four to five years just to get
government permission to build new generation and transmission
facilities. Their deregulation legislation contributed to the
problem by not adequately providing for a competitive marketplace.
In San Diego they saw a 700 percent increase in price in one year's
time. Without the right deregulation plan in place, we could end up
with a similar result in Oklahoma.
There is also a major connection between
the tight gas supply situation I discussed earlier and electricity
because gas is the fuel of the future for electrical generation. We
have all worked so well together to sell the benefits of gas,
particularly the environmental benefits, that predictions of a 30
TCF marketplace in the next 20 years are not at all outlandish.
Ninety-six percent of planned power generation projects will be gas
fired. Oklahoma has 21 such gas-fired power plants on the drawing
board.
What
the industry or knowledgeable policymakers have not done well is to
demand policies at the state and federal levels that will result in
production sufficient to meet these demands. My friend Dan Yergin,
chairman of Cambridge Energy, said recently, "There is kind of a
disconnect in this country with natural gas. We are just assuming
that it will be there."
I
agree with Dan. Some politicians do not want to face the fact that
it won't be there if we don't drill for it. If we want domestic
production, the President and Congress had better let the producers
in this country know it.
Winston Churchill once said, "Men
occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick
themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened." We can no
longer afford leadership on energy that walks on by the truth. On
October 19, Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan said,
"Policymakers will need to be on the alert for oil-driven, indeed,
energy-driven, risks to our expansion."
We
are facing a national energy crisis. But that crisis can be averted
with an honest assessment of our resources, existing
infrastructure, and demand for energy, coupled with national,
bipartisan leadership that will put in place policies that allow
America to meet our energy needs.
The
states have done their part in trying to maintain their domestic
options. Governor Keating has led 28 of the 33 energy-producing
states in passing legislation to preserve domestic production and
provide affordable energy for American consumers.
Fueling the American consumer is what this
effort is all about. Americans, whether oilmen or deliverymen, need
certainty about what U.S. energy policy is. Let me begin this
discussion on a blueprint for a more secure energy future with the
following suggestions:
-
I recommend that the state and federal
government act to protect consumers in the short term by providing
greater support for low-income Americans through the Low-Income
Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) and the free weatherization
programs.
-
As we put together a plan of action,
conservation and alternative fuels must be part of our portfolio.
Frankly, higher prices are already starting to encourage this.
-
To ensure abundant supplies of energy at
reasonable prices for the long haul, the United States must
immediately state its intention that, in the national interest, it
will encourage the rebuilding of our national energy production,
refining, and delivery systems. It must allow reasonable access to
federal lands to provide reliable, abundant, and reasonably priced
energy to fuel the high-tech, energy-intensive American
economy.
-
This statement of national intent must be
stated as both domestic and foreign policy. Frankly, the other oil
producing nations of the world would welcome knowing what our
policy is and may work with us towards greater stability and
reasonable prices for all consumers.
I am
optimistic that with strong national leadership supported by the
states, the specific policy options outlined in our final panel can
turn around the present crisis we face. I hope so, because our
children's future is at stake.
Denise A. Bode is Vice
Chairman of the Oklahoma Corporation Commission, the state agency
that regulates all activities associated with the exploration and
production of oil and gas, the rates and services of public
utilities, and the operation of intrastate transportation. She gave
the keynote address at "Energy Shortages in Energy-Rich
America--Why?" a conference co-sponsored by Governor Frank Keating
of Oklahoma and The Heritage Foundation.