(Archived document, may contain errors)
The Future of Cambodia
By Kassie Neou Cambodia, April 1975. The Khmer Rouge marched into
Phnom Penh and began an ex- termination policy that resulted in the
self-destruction of Cambodia, the Cambodian cul- ture, and the
Cambodian socialstructure. Between 1.5-million.and.2 minion lives
were lost. This holocaust was unique. In Germany, Jews were killed
by Germans. In Armenia, Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia, the
atrocities were committed by Russians. In our country, though,
Cambodians killed Cambodians. Being a survivor of this holocaust, I
was haunted by images of the Khmer Rouge. Thus, I welcomed the
invading Vietnamese forces in 1978 as liberators. Following t h e
downfall of the Pol Pot regime, a new government was installed by
the in- vading forces of Vietnam. However, most of the key
government officials, as well as army and police officers, are
former Khmer Rouge. Moreover, the security apparatus and the poli c
ies of the Interior Ministry are similar to those of Pol Pot. As a
result, Cambodians - both in and out of the country - realize they
are still in the same slow moving boat, only with different crew
members. In my August 1989 trip to Cambodia, I felt like a stranger
among my own people. In the fifteen years since the Khmer Rouge
first came to power, the Cambodian people themsel- ves had been
changed. They exhibited unexpected behavior patterns that seemed
strange to me at first. Only after countless offici a l and
unofficial contacts with old friends, classmates, government
officials, businessmen, army officers, students, teachers, pedicab
drivers, and peasants did I begin to understand why my people are
what they are today. First, they face a daily struggle f or basic
necessities and food. Second, they live in an atmosphere of fear,
both from the threat of systematic Vietnamese colonization, as well
as from the threat of Pol Pot's return. It can be said that the
Cambodian people are caught between a tiger and a crocodile. Far
From Free. I found life under the current regime an improvement
over that of the Pol Pot era. Yet my people are far from free.
Killings continue, only in a less public fashion. Human rights
violations still occur. Disappearances continue. T he regime is an
oppressive one. People still do not have genuine freedom. Freedom
of association, freedom of expres- sion, and freedom of the press
are tightly controlled. I think it would be enlightening to share
with you what I learned from our delegati o n's interview of the
current Prime Mini- ster, Hun Sen. We asked him about freedom of
speech in Cambodia. Specifically, we asked if our delegation's trip
report could be published in Cambodia. He responded: "The content
of the article is the freedom of th e writer. In case the reality
is not properly expressed, [we]
Kassie Neon is a survivor of the Khmer Rouge holocaust in
Cambodia. He revisited his homeland in 1989. He spoke to The
Heritage Foundation's Asian Studies Center on April 4, 1990. ISSN
0272-1155. 01990 by The Heritage Foundation.
must reserve the right to deny [its publication]. As far as
publication is concerned, it has to be through the channel of the
government ...... We then asked him about promoting education about
and protection of human rights. To this, he stated: " We are very
concerned about the issue. But we have difficulty in abiding by the
human rights laws because the country is still in the state of
war." We asked ifAmnesty.1mernational-could -visit-Cambodian
prisons. His response : "We will consider the issue in the near
future. So far we never allow any prison visits due to the war
situation." Then we asked if our delegation could visit Phnom
Penh's central prison, known as T-3. Again Hun Sen turned down the
request. Clearly, we w e re getting nowhere with Hun Sen. However,
I was able to get much more candid responses through several
informal discussions with a number of government offi- cials. One
noted that crime had become rampant in the countryside. He told me
that forced army co n scription had stripped farms of able-bodied
men, leaving behind only women, in- fants, and the elderly. The
result: poor harvests. His concern is that next year there will be
starvation, because of an increasing population and a decreasing
number of farme r s. He added that some rice is also shipped to
Vietnam, compounding the problem. Rampant Corruption. The same
official admitted that systematic corruption exists throughout the
government. Any request or application requires a bribe, no matter
how small th e job. From village to hamlet to district levels, you
need to bribe or you will not be helped. Previously, under Prince
Norodom Sihanouk, and later under Cambodian President Lon Nol,
there was also corruption. But corruption under the current regime
is muc h more widespread. This has made living standards of the
people within the vicinity of Phnom Penh and other cities very low.
But if you travel further out to the hamlets or villages, such as
in Takeo province, living is miserable. Corruption even extends t o
health care. Modern medicine is scarce and too expensive to be
affordable to the public. When one needs to go to the hospital, one
must first have the right connection, then have a substantial
amount of cash for a bribe. Nowadays, bribery is a daily fact of
life. The education system is equally tainted. Students who wish to
pursue higher education in the fields of medicine, agriculture, or
commerce must have gold to bribe. As a result, talented poor
students stand little chance in those fields. Students w h o do not
pass junior high mostly end up in the army. In order to avoid
conscription into the army, one must obtain a junior or high school
diploma and then pass the exam to enter a career school. To pursue
education abroad, one must have enough money or g o ld to pay off
the proper officials. However, this opportunity is limited to the
children of the revolutionary cadres or the wealthy. Several
sources related to me cases of "disappearances." These can be the
result of forced army conscription, arbitrary ar rests, or
kidnappings. In addition, armed robbery is also rampant. What makes
solving these cases even harder is that the Justice Ministry does
not seem to have access to the thousands of detainees held by the
Police Department of the Interior Ministry.
2
Mixed Record. As far as religion is concerned, the Hanoi-installed
Hun Sen regime has a mixed record. On the one hand, numerous Muslim
mosques and Buddhist temples have been restored. On the other hand,
Cambodian Christians still face discrimination. Unt il today, not a
single church has been restored. Buddhism has become the state
religion. There is Buddhist preaching and praying on national radio
broadcasts. Anyone of age can become a Buddhist monk, but only
after being approved by the village chief, ha m let chief, district
chief, province-chief,. and, the United front of Religion.-One must
also have a sub- stantial amount of money for bribing along the
way.This is no way for a people to live. For the past two decades
Cambodians have been deprived of thei r human rights - forced to
live like animals.They are under constant threat of government
brutality, and live filled with hunger, fear, and hopelessness. The
first thing they need is peace. Pol Pot Holdovers. But can the
killings be immediately stopped? Ho w can the current regime be
trusted when it is filled with former Khmer Rouge officers? Let me
list to you the current leaders of Cambodia who were formerly with
the murderous Pol Pot regime: the communist party leader, Heng
Samrin; the Prime Minister, Hun Sen; the Deputy Prime Minister, Hor
Namhong; the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed forces, Pol Saroeun;
the Minister of Trade; the Interior Minister; the leader of the
National Assembly; theTrade Union Chairman; as well as hundreds of
others in the Interior Ministry, the police, the army, and the
district and provincial leadership. To the Cambodian people, Hun
Sen and Pol Pot represent two factions of the Khmer Rouge. Both
have abused human rights; and it would be wrong to call the current
leader- ship "good guys" just because they broke away from the
Khmer Rouge. They were with Pol Pot when the genocide took place
and they are just as guilty as Pol Pot. After 20 years of killing,
the only way to find a solution to the Cambodian tragedy is to ex-
change bulle t s for ballots. Our precious responsibility is to
enable the Cambodian people to choose their own form of democratic
government without intimidation from any political faction. In
Peter Jennings' report of April 26, Mr. Stanley Cloud of Newsweek
called the U.S.-supported formula a "one in a thousand" chance. I
call that an improvement over no chance. Let's go for it. Any other
formula is a recipe for disaster. Some people are trying to offer
the Cambodian people a plan similar to the one offered Lithuania f
o rty years ago, when the Soviets were presented as saviors from
the Nazis. Giving Cambodians A Chance. While the world cheers the
coming of democracy in East- ern Europe, Cambodians who have paid
with flesh and blood for 20 years deserve an oppor- tunity f o r
peace, freedom, independence and democracy. Don't make us wait 40
years for our freedom, like Lithuania. Let us have freedom now. If
the U.S. is really concerned about the plight of the Cambodian
people and sincere in wanting to stop the killings, it mu s t
support the proposed U.N. comprehensive settlement for peace in
Cambodia. It is the only plan that provides for a cease-fire, the
disarmament of all parties, and a halt to arms supplies. It also
provides for an interim U.N. administration of Cambodia, v e
rification of the withdrawal of the foreign occupiers, and free and
fair elec- tions. These elections would give Cambodians the chance,
at long last, to choose their own leaders and their own government
- a right that has been denied far too long. The aut hor is
grateful to 7 =ian Studies Center Research Associate Thomas J.
Timmons for his help in preparing the final version of this
lecture.
3
}}