(Archived document, may contain errors)
3/6/89 228
A CAUTIOUS GREEN LIGHT FOR THE U.S.-JAPAN FIGHTER DEAL
The United States and Japan agreed last June to join in
developing.japan',s,next-.generation attack aircraft, called the
Fighter Support Experimental (FS-X). - Last minute opposition in
the U.S., however, has forced the Bush Administration to delay a
final;decision on the matter until March 10. This is causing
problems that are threatening to unravel'the agreement. For one
thing, Tokyo needs to begin awarding FS-X contracts by the end of
March, whd.n Japan's fiscal year ends. For another, t he issue is
straining U.S.-Japan relations. At the heart of the matter is a
conflict within the U.S. government. Both the State and Defense
Departments support the agreement because it strengthens the
U.S.-Japan alliance. By contrast, the Commerce Departm e nt and the
office of the U.S. Trade Representative want the U.S. to reconsider
the deal. George Bush should review the U.S.-Japan FS-X agreement
and the report on it that the Defense and Commerce Departments
should issue within the next week. Unless there are unforeseen
problems with the deal,.he: should. not,delay a decision-to@ -
proceed with the agreement beyond the end of this month. The debate
over FS-X has been triggered by concerns about U.S. economic
competitiveness and the continuing U.S. trade de f icit with Japan,
which last year totalled $55 billion. The debate tests whether the
Bush Administration will seek confro 'ntation@. or cooperation with
Japan, America's most powerful economic competitor and its'most
important militarylally in Asia, whose g rowing strength is a cause
for anxiety in Washington and, Asian capitals. Working Out a
Compromise. At Washington's insistence, forithe-past eight years
Japan has been building up its naval and air forces to fulfill a
1981 pledgetb defend its sea lanes ou t to 1,000 miles. 'Me
Japanese Air Self Defense Force, for example, is now upgrading its
129 U.S.-designed F-4 Phantom fighter aircraft, built in Japan
under license, and,Japan.,is-now... producing 200 U.S.-designed
F-15 Eagles - currently the best U.S. je t fighter. Japan
originally wanted to build the FS-X by itself, as a replacement for
its 80 F-1 fighter-bombers, developed and built by Mitsubishi Heavy
Industries. Washington was opposed to this and, in the mid-1980s,
urged Japan to buy a U.S. aircraft. T o kyo refused, claiming that
existing U.S. designs did not meet its requirements. Following
intense criticism of its massive trade surplus with the U.S., Tokyo
last June agreed to a compromise that would give part of the FS-X
project to U.S. firms: Japan wo u ld co-develop FS-X with America's
Texas-based General Dynamics Corporation, using General Dynamics'
F- 16 Falcon as the basis for design of the Japanese aircraft. The
final agreement worked out last December calls for an estimated
$1.2 billion development program to be shared, 60 percent by
Japan's Mitsubishi, and 40 percent by General Dynamics. But by late
January, opponents in the Commerce Department and the U.S. Trade
Representative's Office began urging Bush to review the deal and
delay his final decis ion until March 10.
ne main argument raised by opponents of the FS-X deal is that
the U.S. will be giving Japan advanced technology that Tokyo will
use to develop a civil aerospace industry that eventually will
compete with U.S. firms. This argument make s little sense,
however, because the F- 16 represents 1970s technology that is not
relevant to developing civilian jet transports. Furthermore, Japan
will not be getting any more technology than the eight other
countries (including Denmark, Israel, and Th e Netherlands) that
already co-produce the F-16. Critics also say Japan gets a better
deal than the U.S. from the FS-X agreement. The reasons: Japan will
get F-16 technology that cost the U.S. $7 billion and the deal is
vague on how much General Dynamics w i ll share in a $7 billion to
$8 billion production run for the planned 130 fighters. It seems,
however, that General Dynamics understands that its production
share will be comparable to its development contribution. Gaining
Advanced Japanese Technology. A m ajor benefit to the U.S. of the
FS-X agreement is that the U.S. will receive any new technology
developed by the Japanese. This is unprecedented in U.S.-Japanese
agreements. Indeed, U.S.-Japan defense technology,;5...:
cooperation has been slow, despite a 1983 agreement which committed
Japan to export defense-related technology to the U.S. The
technology@-sharing aspect of the agreement, in fact, has been
controversial in Japan because of Tokyo's self-imposed ban on
weapons exports. As such, the FS-X- deal is a major advance on the
1983 agreement. Japan will make a significant investment in
developing advanced composite material wings and phased radars;
this technology the U.S. could receive at no cost. Some American
critics of the FS-X deal want Japan to b u y an existing U.S.
design "off the shelf." This would yield the greatest trade
revenues to the U.S. and would not risk transferring any American
technology to Japan. Yet this never has been an option. Japan has
not purchased fighters off the shelf since 1 9 55. While the FS-X
deal makes good sense from an American perspective, Congress should
scrutinize it carefully. Congress has 30 days in which it can veto
the agreement after the Administration notifies Congress of the
sale. Congress should use this period to make clear that the U.S.
expects a substantial share of co-production and wants guarantees
that U.S. technology will not be sold to enemies. The
Administration can also press Japan to buy from the U.S. in-flight
tanker refueling aircraft and AWACS airc r aft that Japan needs.
Allaying Fears. The FS-X agreement increases U.S. and Japanese ,
military interdependence. Already, Japan is cooperating with the
U.S. Strategic Defense Initiative, purchasing advanced Aegis radars
for new destroyers, and increasing j oint defense planning and
military exercises. This U.S.- Japanese cooperation is needed to
deter Soviet military threat in Asia. But a growing Japanese
military, coinciding with increased Japanese political
assertiveness, increases the anxiety of U.S. fri e nds and allies
who remember Japan's imperialist aggression. Japan building its own
jet fighter may only confirm these fears. The FS-X'deal helps allay
- these fears by increasing the closeness of the U.S. and Japanese
military alliance. On balance, theref ore, the FS-X deal makes
sense for Japan and the United States. Roger A. Brooks Director,
Asian Studies Center
Richard D. Fisher Policy Analyst
For further information: Paul A. Gigot, "Japan-Anxiety Causes a
Dogfight Over F-16 Accord," 7he Wall S&eet Joumali February
24,1989, p. A 16.
}}