INTRODUCTION
When the new Congress took charge in January 1995, the
House and Senate leadership promised fundamental overhaul of the
federal government. Included among the many proposed reforms was
the closing or consolidation of redundant and obsolete government
agencies. The most visible manifestation of this effort was the
call by House freshmen to shut down the Departments of Housing and
Urban Development, Commerce, Energy, and Education. Although this
initiative was associated most closely with the more junior members
of both houses, the goal of streamlining government by terminating
programs and closing agencies also was embraced by the leadership,
with Senate Majority Leader Robert Dole (R-KS) endorsing the Senate
freshmen's plan to close four departments.
In sharp contrast to its record in past years, this time
Congress actually followed through and achieved more than most
observers expected, shutting down over 270 agencies, divisions,
offices, and programs throughout the federal government. This
performance is illustrated by the action taken on 41 independent
agencies recommended for termination in a January 1995 Heritage
Foundation study because of their obsolescence, redundancy, limited
value, or regional focus.1 Excluding
the five independent agencies that are not subject to the annual
appropriations process,2 Congress's
record for the remaining 36 is:
- 13 agencies terminated and $3.6 billion saved over the next
five years.
- Funding for 12 agencies substantially reduced (by 10 percent or
more) and $2.2 billion saved over five years.
- No change or only limited change (funding cut by 10 percent or
less) at 11 agencies and up to $40 million saved over the next five
years.
By taking significant action on 25 (or 70 percent) of the
targeted agencies, this Congress reversed years of inaction on
outmoded programs that had enjoyed uninterrupted growth in their
budgets. Of the 11 agencies sheltered from significant cuts or
termination, all but one -- the Franklin Delano Roosevelt Memorial
Commission, whose funding was tripled -- saw their funding either
modestly reduced or frozen at 1995 levels.
But while Congress has done more than its fair share to
reduce government waste, the President has opposed many of these
efforts by vetoing five of the appropriations bills; a sixth is
stalled in the Senate, threatened by a filibuster. Because these
six bills contain most of the proposed agency terminations, only
about $600 million of the $5.8 billion in potential savings has
been signed into law by the President.
In addition to this progress in dealing with the 41 agencies
cited in the January Heritage report, considerable success was
achieved in dealing with scores of other obsolete programs, many of
which were identified in Rolling Back Government: A Budget Plan to Rebuild
America, the Heritage blueprint for a radical downsizing of
the federal government.3 In the Cabinet
departments reviewed in Rolling Back Government, 251 programs or
program offices were shut down or consolidated, and another 56 were
cut significantly. In addition, Congress shut down eight programs
within the legislative branch. Program terminations and reductions
of this magnitude, in addition to being unprecedented, are a key
component of Congress's $23 billion overall reduction in
discretionary spending from last year's level.4
It is obvious that tremendous progress was made in cutting
wasteful, obsolete, and redundant federal programs during the first
session of the 104th Congress, but much more can be done. Congress
and the President should revisit many of the independent agencies
that survived, including those that were substantially reduced, and
make additional cuts and terminations as appropriate. Reformers
should keep an especially close watch on those agencies that are
scheduled for shutdown or consolidation to guard against end runs
in Congress and last-minute presidential vetoes designed to keep
these unneeded programs in business.
THE CRITERIA FOR CLOSURE
When reviewing government programs for possible phaseout
and funding reductions, lawmakers in each case should assess the
program's value and whether it is truly national in scope. This
means asking four questions:
1) Is the service provided by another government department or
agency?
2) Is the agency amenable to management efficiencies through
consolidation?
3) Can the agency's responsibilities be justified in an era of
competing needs and limited resources?
4) Is the agency's principal focus of regional rather than
national interest?
Examples of the wasteful replication of public services include
the many different agencies and offices tasked with nuclear safety.
One of these, the Office of Nuclear Waste Negotiation, was allowed
to go out of business last year. Among the many similar agencies
that remain are the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the largest and
oldest), the newer and much smaller Defense Nuclear Facilities
Board, the Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board, and the
Presidential Commission on Catastrophic Nuclear Disasters. In
addition to these overlapping independent agencies, the Department
of Energy's Office of Nuclear Performance Assessment, Office of
Nuclear Safety Enforcement, Office of Nuclear Safety Policy and
Standards, Office of Radiological Oversight, and Division of
Transportation and Packaging Safety all perform similar
functions.
While one could argue that there is no such thing as too much
nuclear safety, this scattershot approach, with independent offices
spread throughout Washington, means costly replication.5 More troublesome from a safety perspective is
the potential for unintentional lapses and gaps in oversight
because of divided responsibility, communications difficulties, and
excessive overhead at the expense of safety initiatives. Typical of
this problem is the recent disclosure that the Department of Energy
wasted $59 million on an uncompleted "Waste Management Programmatic
Environmental Impact Statement." 6
Achieving Efficiency Through
Consolidation
Even when the specific responsibilities of independent agencies
are decidedly different, their functions may be sufficiently
similar to allow for management efficiencies through consolidation.
This can reduce costs and allow more federal financial resources to
go directly to the intended beneficiaries rather than to
administering bureaucrats.
Examples of federal administrative redundancy include the
scholarship funds established to honor prominent Americans. The
Barry Goldwater Scholarship Foundation and the Morris K. Udall
Scholarship and Excellence in National Environmental Policy
Foundation, while worthy in purpose, are also top-heavy with
bureaucratic burdens that diminish their ability to achieve their
mandated purpose. According to the President's FY 1996 budget, the
Harry S. Truman Scholarship Foundation will spend $1.13 million to
provide $2 million in scholarships, and the James Madison Memorial
Fellowship Foundation will spend $986,000 to provide just
$1,008,000 in fellowships to students. A dollar spent on excessive
administrative overhead is a dollar denied a student or
scholar.
A better way to honor America's leaders would be to consolidate
these scholarship programs within a single foundation or existing
agency already involved in making academic grants, such as the
National Science Foundation or the Department of Education. This
would reduce overhead costs substantially. Given the modest size of
each of these programs, it makes no sense to maintain five separate
accounting departments, five mailrooms, five travel budgets, five
costly executives, five executive assistants, and five versions of
all the other services needed to operate a scholarship program.
Low-Priority Agencies
Other independent agencies perform functions that, while
possibly interesting and important to a few, cannot be justified in
an era when available government resources are far short of what is
needed to satisfy more pressing national goals. If the Department
of State and Department of Defense are fulfilling their missions
adequately, taxpayers are entitled to ask why additional millions
of dollars are spent on the Institute of Peace, the North-South
Center, or the Japan-United States Friendship Commission.
Apparently many Members of Congress agree, because two of these
agencies were subjected to significant cutbacks last year.
Similarly, do the President and Members of Congress really need
a Commission of Fine Arts, at a cost of nearly $1 million a year in
salaries and administrative expenses, to advise them on matters of
architecture, painting, and sculpture? Apparently they still think
so, because the 104th Congress chose to keep it fully funded for
another year. Fortunately, the National Endowments for the Arts and
the Humanities were not so lucky; they were subjected to major cuts
last year.
Agencies of Regional Interest
Some programs have purely regional benefits and no national
impact. Examples are the several independent agencies conducting
special programs for specific East Coast river basins, such as the
Susquehanna River Basin Commission. These programs may have some
significance for specific states or regions, but they provide
little direct value beyond that. Congress apparently agrees,
because all of these regionally focused agencies are scheduled to
shut down or lose their federal financial support this year.
STATUS OF AGENCIES IN THE HERITAGE REPORT
Below is a brief summary of the 36 agencies identified in the
January 1995 Heritage study. In each case, the review indicates
what action has been taken, how much money will be saved for
taxpayers over the next five years, and whether the White House has
signed the necessary legislation into law.
Agencies Congress Voted to Close Down
Administrative Conference of the
United States
Purpose
Assists the President, Congress, and federal departments in
improving the efficiency, adequacy, and fairness of the
administrative procedures used within government and with private
citizens.
Rationale for Termination
Given the general agreement within Congress and the executive
branch on the need for a fundamental overhaul of the way government
does business and serves the public, it is apparent that the
Conference has little to show for the millions of taxpayer dollars
it has spent in its 30 years of existence. The Commission should be
abolished in favor of more comprehensive and more promising efforts
being considered in Congress or recommended by the Administration's
own National Performance Review.
Congressional Action
Congress has passed legislation to terminate the Conference and
appropriated $600,000 for 1996 to cover the costs associated with
the shutdown.
Five-Year Savings
$9.5 million.
White House Action
President Clinton has signed the legislation into law.
Advisory Commission on
Intergovernmental Relations
Purpose
Examines federal, state, and local trends, events, and programs
that affect intergovernmental relations and makes recommendations
as appropriate.
Rationale for Termination
Despite its stated purpose, the Commission has never played a
serious role in the debate concerning levels of government in the
federal system. Key debates and decisions on issues such as revenue
sharing, unfunded mandates, interstate commerce, and transport
generally have been handled elsewhere as mayors, governors,
Congress, and the President work together to resolve problems and
develop policy.
Congressional Action
Congress has passed legislation to terminate the Conference,
and $784,000 has been appropriated to cover termination expenses
and final work products.
Five-Year Savings
$4.8 million.
White House Action
President Clinton has signed the bill into law.
Commission on National Community
Service
Purpose
Established in 1990 to encourage all citizens, especially young
people, to engage in community service. Makes grants to states and
other entities to create service opportunities for students and
out-of-school youth.
Rationale for Termination
America has an extensive tradition of volunteer work and
charitable giving, most of it oriented toward locally based
community service organizations. It is a waste of taxpayer dollars
for the federal government to encourage Americans to do what they
already are doing in great numbers.
Congressional Action
The Commission was merged last year into the Corporation for
National and Community Service, which Congress has scheduled for
termination this year.
Five-Year Savings
Approximately $250 million to $300 million, based on FY 1995
spending of $54.4 million.
White House Action
No action is necessary on the Commission, but President Clinton
has vetoed proposed termination of the Corporation, as discussed
below.
National Community Service Program
Purpose
As one of two main components of the Corporation for National
and Community Service, this program is supposed to encourage
Americans to engage in volunteer work and community service.
President Clinton's AmeriCorps is part of this program and exists
to pay stipends and other financial benefits to "volunteers."
Rationale for Termination
America's extensive tradition of volunteer work does not
require federal involvement or financial support.
Congressional Action
Congress voted to terminate the Corporation's National
Community Service Program. (See next section for proposed cutbacks
in other programs operated by the Corporation.)
Five-Year Savings
$2.862 billion.
White House Action
The President has vetoed the appropriations bill which included
this termination.
Delaware River Basin Commission
Purpose
Participates jointly with basin states -- Delaware, New Jersey,
New York, and Pennsylvania -- in the development of regional water
and related resources.
Rationale for Termination
The benefits of the Commission's activities accrue mostly to
the contiguous states in the Delaware River Basin. Therefore, these
states should fund the program in its entirety. There is no reason
for federal taxpayers to fund costly programs of strictly regional
interest and benefit.
Congressional Action
Congress ended federal support for the Commission this year and
has provided final payment of $343,000 to facilitate the transition
to self-sufficiency.
Five-Year Savings
Estimated at $4.3 million.
White House Action
President Clinton has signed this bill into law.
FDIC Affordable Housing and Bank
Enterprise
Purpose
Offers select properties in inventory to eligible households
and organizations for low-income housing.
Rationale for Termination
The Enterprise competes directly with the objectives and
programs of HUD, as well as with those of numerous state and local
programs with a similar purpose. Experience demonstrates that the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) has had a difficult
enough time pursuing its main purpose -- promoting the safety and
soundness of banks -- and ought not to involve itself in the
difficult task of attempting to house the poor. The Enterprise
should be terminated or consolidated with similar housing
programs.
Congressional Action
Congress enacted legislation to terminate the program, arguing
that "[g]iven the plethora of housing programs already in existence
through HUD and other federal housing agencies... the Committee
questions the value of yet another program, no matter the merit of
its intent."
Five-Year Savings
Estimated at $82.1 million.
White House Action
President Clinton has vetoed the appropriations bill which
included this termination.
Institute of American Indian and
Alaska Native Culture and Arts
Purpose
Provides Native Americans with an opportunity to obtain
post-secondary education in various fields of Indian art and
culture.
Rationale for Termination or Consolidation: It is unwise
for the federal government to be in the business of directly
funding studies in one culture in preference to others. Existing
student loan and grant programs from other sources can be used to
support post-secondary education for eligible students through
accredited institutions of learning. The program should be
terminated or consolidated with other scholarship funds or related
programs.
Congressional Action
Congress provided the Institute with $5.5 million this year,
compared with $11.5 million last year, with the understanding that
federal funding will be phased out.
Five-Year Savings
Estimated at $56.6 million.
White House Action
President Clinton vetoed the appropriations bill which
terminated the Institute.
Interstate Commission on the Potomac
River Basin
Purpose
Created on behalf of the four contiguous states and the
District of Columbia to promote water pollution abatement and
control and manage water and land resources in the Potomac River
Basin.
Rationale for Termination
Responsibility for the funding and management of this
commission should rest entirely with the District and the affected
states.
Congressional Action
Congress provided the Commission with a payment of $511,000 as
final year funding for the orderly transition to
self-sufficiency.
Five-Year Savings
Estimated at $2.3 million.
White House Action
President Clinton has signed the bill into law.
Office of Nuclear Waste Negotiator
Purpose
To find a state or Indian tribe willing to host a nuclear waste
site.
Rationale for Termination or Consolidation
As with other independent agencies concerned with nuclear
issues, this office should be consolidated with another independent
agency, such as the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, or with the
appropriate division within the Department of Energy or the
Environmental Protection Agency.
Congressional Action
The Office was allowed to expire in early 1995. A number of
these agencies are scheduled to self-destruct, and no specific
congressional action is required. Indeed, as last year's government
shutdowns indicated, most discretionary programs are of this
nature.
Five-Year Savings
$1 million per year.
White House Action
No action required.
Pennsylvania Avenue Development
Corporation
Purpose
Performs a variety of real estate development functions,
including design, land acquisition, and construction of projects
related to the improvement of the Pennsylvania Avenue corridor
connecting the White House with the Capitol.
Rationale for Termination
Since its creation in 1972, the Corporation has invested
millions of tax dollars in this one-mile stretch of road, turning
the once-decrepit strip of deteriorated buildings into one of
Scenic America's ten "Most Scenic Byways." Although this
task was fulfilled years ago, the Corporation continues to receive
substantial public funds for commercial real estate development
activities best left to the private sector.
Congressional Action
Congress has enacted legislation to terminate the Corporation
by April 1, 1996, and has authorized the use of prior year funds to
facilitate the shutdown. Real estate development in progress will
be transferred to the U.S. General Services Administration.
Five-Year Savings
Estimated at $245 million.
White House Action
President Clinton vetoed the appropriations bill terminating
the Corporation.
State Justice Institute
Purpose
Established in 1984 to make grants and undertake activities to
improve the administration of justice in the United States.
Rationale for Termination
Continued high crime rates and public disappointment in the
behavior of the court system over the past several years suggest
that the Institute has not much to show for its costly ten-year
effort to improve America's administration of justice.
Congressional Action
Congress appropriated $5 million to provide for the orderly
phaseout of direct federal support.
Five-Year Savings
$67.5 million.
White House Action
The President vetoed the appropriations bill which included
termination of the Institute.
Susquehanna River Basin Commission
Purpose
Participates jointly with affected states in the development of
water and related resources in the Susquehanna River Basin.
Rationale for Termination
As with similar commissions, the responsibility for funding and
management should be turned over to the contiguous states.
Congressional Action
Congress enacted legislation to withdraw federal support from
the Commission and provided $318,000 to facilitate the transition
to self-sufficiency.
Five-Year Savings
Estimated at $1.3 million.
White House Action
President Clinton has signed this into law.
Thomas Jefferson Commemorative
Commission
Purpose
Established to honor the 250th anniversary of Jefferson's
birth. The anniversary occurred in 1993.
Rationale for Termination
Despite the passing of the anniversary three years ago, $31,000
was scheduled to be spent in FY 1995 and another $25,000 in FY 1996
for post-birthday events. Because it has met its stated objective,
there is little or no reason for the Commission to exist.
Congressional Action
The Commission was allowed to expire, and no federal spending
is scheduled after this fiscal year.
Five-Year Savings
Estimated at $500,000.
White House Action
No action is required to fulfill such a previously scheduled
expiration.
Agencies Congress Voted to Cut Substantially
Advisory Council on Historic
Preservation
Purpose
Provides independent advice to the President and Congress
relating to the national historic preservation program.
Rationale for Termination
Historic preservation, including the development of appropriate
policies, should be a local responsibility. The only exception
might be for landmarks of national significance, and these cases
can be handled by the U.S. National Park Service and its Division
of Cultural Resources.
Congressional Action
Congress has voted to reduce the Council's FY 1996 funding by
15 percent, down to $2.5 million from last year's $2.94 million,
and advises the Council to find ways to be reimbursed by government
agencies for which it provides a service.
Five-Year Savings
Estimated at $2.5 million.
White House Action
President Clinton vetoed the appropriations bill that included
this funding cut.
Appalachian Regional Commission
Purpose
Provides guidance and financial assistance to the 13
Appalachian states for basic facilities and support to promote
economic growth in the region. Programs focus on transportation
access and on community, business, and human development.
Rationale for Termination
Although it is one of the more costly independent agencies,
there is no convincing evidence that the ARC, after more than 30
years of operation, has been effective in creating new jobs or
capital investment. In practice, it serves largely as a source of
pork-barrel spending for the region's politicians. West Virginia, a
focus of much of the Commission's attention, is still poor and
becoming poorer relative to the rest of the country. The per capita
income of West Virginia's population ranked 43rd in the country in
1980 but fell to 46th by 1994, and its unemployment rate is
consistently one of the highest in the country. It is time to try
something new for the problems of West Virginia and other
Appalachian states -- such as tax cuts, enterprise zones, school
choice, and deregulation.
Congressional Action
Finally recognizing the failure of pork-barrel projects to spur
growth, this Congress slashed the Commission's budget by 40
percent, appropriating only $170 million for 1996 compared with
$282 million last year.
Five-Year Savings
$568.6 million.
White House Action
President Clinton has signed the bill into law.
Arms Control and Disarmament
Agency
Purpose
Advises the President and Secretary of State on arms control,
non-proliferation, and disarmament activities and participates in
negotiations with other countries.
Rationale for Termination
As a product of the Cold War, ACDA largely has fulfilled its
mission by a series of nuclear, conventional, and chemical weapons
agreements. For many years, ACDA has been overshadowed by other
U.S. agencies, particularly the State, Energy, and Defense
Departments, in its pursuit of disarmament. The Agency is outmoded
and duplicative and should be abolished, with arms control issues
mandated to other, more appropriate agencies.
Congressional Action
Congress has reduced the Agency's budget by 34 percent, cutting
it from $54.4 million last year to $35.7 this year.
Five-Year Savings
$101.5 million.
White House Action
The President has vetoed the appropriations bill which included
these cuts.
Corporation for National and Community
Service
Purpose
Engages Americans of all ages and backgrounds in
community-based service focused on the nation's educational, human,
public safety, and environmental needs.
Rationale for Termination
Given America's proud tradition of volunteerism and charitable
giving, much of it oriented toward locally based community service
organizations, it is a waste of federal dollars to encourage
Americans to do what they already do in great numbers.
Congressional Action
Congress has enacted legislation to terminate the largest of
the Corporation's programs, the National Community Service Program,
which includes AmeriCorps (see previous section). The House and
Senate have yet to agree on spending for the Corporation's Domestic
Volunteer Service Programs, which include such programs as VISTA
(Volunteers in Service to America); the Senate has passed cuts from
1995 levels of 6 percent, while the House has reduced spending by
14 percent.
Five-Year Savings
$71.5 million (Senate bill) to $154 million (House bill).
White House Action
An earlier version of this bill was vetoed by President
Clinton. The appropriations bill in which these cuts were proposed
is stalled in Senate.
East-West Center
Purpose
Promotes better relations between the U.S. and the nations of
Asia and the Pacific through cooperative programs of study,
research, and training.
Rationale for Termination
The resources and talents of the State Department, which
maintains a network of embassies and consulates in Asian and
Pacific nations, should be sufficient to maintain good relations
with these countries. Deficiencies that remain not likely to be
rectified by the cooperative programs of the Center.
Congressional Action
Congress has cut the Center's budget by more than half (52
percent), reducing this year's spending to $11.75 million from
$24.5 million in 1995. The House actually proposed to terminate the
Center; the large cut reflects compromise with Senate.
Five-Year Savings
$70.3 million.
White House Action
President Clinton has vetoed the appropriations bill that
included this cut.
Institute of Peace
Purpose
Conducts and supports research and scholarship in the fields of
international peace and conflict resolution.
Rationale for Termination
Although the world remains a dangerous place, responsibility
for maintaining and enhancing peace should remain with the State
and Defense Departments, in cooperation with Congress and the
multilateral organizations to which the United States belongs and
contributes. The scholarly endeavors of the Peace Institute
replicate, at taxpayer expense, the efforts of academics and
private research organizations concerned with international
relations.
Congressional Action
A successful Senate filibuster against the appropriations bill
that would fund the Institute makes the outcome uncertain; the
House voted for a nearly 50 percent cut, while the Senate proposed
to maintain funding at last year's level.
Five-Year Savings
$16.1 million assuming House-Senate conferees split the
difference and cut the Institute's budget by nearly 25 percent.
White House Action
Necessary legislation is stalled in the Senate.
Legal Services Corporation
Purpose
Funds private attorneys, nonprofit organizations, and state and
local agencies to provide free civil legal assistance to the
poor.
Rationale for Termination
Financed in part by federal dollars and tasked with providing
legal representation for the poor, Corporation-supported lawyers
and grantees frequently have used their positions and resources to
pursue political and lobbying activities. These efforts have
included such things as legal action against welfare reform,
Proposition 187 (California's immigration reform), and state and
local tax reductions, to name just a few. Given its history of
political activism, and given the substantial funding the legal
services system receives from non-federal sources, taxpayer support
should be ended and the Corporation privatized.7
The Corporation serves largely as a source of federal tax
dollars for approximately 323 locally based grantees -- such as the
Legal Aid Society of Central Texas and the Food Research Action
Center -- that do the actual legal work. In addition to receiving
taxpayers' money through the Corporation, these grantees in 1993
also received an additional $245 million from other sources,
including IOLTA (Interest on Lawyers Trust Accounts) funds, state
and local grants, and private and nonprofit contributions.
Moreover, the legal profession provides significant amounts of pro
bono work for needy clients and social issues. A privatized
Corporation easily could build on this extensive funding base and
work with state, national, and local bar associations to secure and
enhance IOLTA and other private or nonprofit funding for grantees
and provide a tighter focus for their representational work.
Congressional Action
After years of rapid spending growth, this Congress has
achieved what many thought impossible by enacting significant cuts
in the Corporation's budget, reducing it from $400 million in 1995
to $278 million this year.
Five-Year Savings
$680.5 million.
White House Action
The President vetoed the appropriations bill which included
this cut.
Marine Mammal Commission
Purpose
Coordinates America's marine mammal policy, reviews the status
of the marine mammal population, and recommends conservation steps
to relevant government departments.
Rationale for Termination
No other form of non-human life, endangered or otherwise, has
its own commission. This costly precedent should be terminated.
Existing federal programs, such as NOAA's Coastal Ecosystems Health
and Recovering Protected Species programs, are tasked to perform
similar responsibilities, as is the Interior Department's Fish and
Wildlife Service.
Congressional Action
Congress passed legislation that would cut the Commission's
budget by 14 percent, from $1.4 million in 1995 to $1.2 million in
1996.
Five-Year Savings
$1.1 million.
White House Action
President Clinton vetoed the appropriations bill which included
these cuts.
National Capital Arts and Cultural
Affairs
Purpose
Provides payments for general operating support to Washington,
D.C., arts and other cultural organizations.
Rationale for Termination
Citizens of Washington, D.C., and visitors to the city are the
beneficiaries of major federally supported arts and cultural
programs well in excess of what is available in other cities.
Washington's culturally rich environment would scarcely notice the
loss of this $7 million taxpayer-funded program.
Congressional Action
Congress enacted legislation that would cut the Commission's
budget by 20 percent, from $7.5 million last year to $6 million in
1996.
Five-Year Savings
$8.3 million.
White House Action
President Clinton vetoed the appropriations bill that included
these cuts.
National Foundation on the Arts and
Humanities
Purpose
Umbrella organization for the National Endowment for the Arts
(NEA), National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH), and Institute
of Museum Services. The NEA provides grants to and contracts with
groups, individuals, and state and regional organizations engaged
in or concerned with the arts. The NEH funds activities intended to
improve the quality of education and teaching in the
humanities.
Rationale for Termination
In recent years, Americans have had good reason to be concerned
about efforts to promote government-sanctioned art, from public
commissions to approve or reject architectural design, to
requirements that some portion of a building's construction budget
be devoted to art, to the bureaucratically approved and funded art
of the NEA. The NEA should be closed down and American artists
encouraged to turn their energies to winning private support for
their creative endeavors rather than engaging in political
grantsmanship.
Similarly, the NEH recently demonstrated its questionable
judgment by producing, among other things, a breathtakingly
distorted curriculum for the teaching of American history, thereby
confirming the worst fears of those who argued that federal
involvement in education would promote propaganda rather than the
search for truth. It is time to terminate the NEH before
doctrinaire bodies like the National Committee for History
Standards further undermine education and the appreciation of
American culture.
Congressional Action
After years of escalating spending, Congress finally has made
deep cuts in the budgets of the NEA and NEH. These cuts reflect a
comprise between the House and Senate, with the House preferring to
terminate these programs within the next two years. In the
compromise plan, the NEA's budget, including its matching grant
program, will be cut 39 percent from $162.3 million in 1995 to
$99.4 in 1996; the NEH budget, including matching grants, will be
cut by 35 percent, from $172 million in 1995 to $112 million this
year, yielding potential five-year savings of $333.2 million and a
total of $682.5 million over the next five years for both
agencies.
Five-Year Savings
$349.3 million (NEA) and $333.2 million (NEH).
White House Action
President Clinton vetoed the appropriations bill that included
these cuts.
National Commission on Libraries and
Information Science
Purpose
Responsible for developing plans to meet the library and
information needs of the nation, and for coordinating federal,
state, and local government activities to meet these needs.
Rationale for Termination
America's system of libraries -- most of them locally based and
supported -- is the envy of the world. Moreover, the rapid
technological advances taking place within the information
industries promise unprecedented access to a wealth of information
at modest cost. Much of this rapid change is driven by the
profit-seeking private sector, and there is little need for
government involvement, financial support, or expert guidance. The
federal government's greatest contribution would be to get out of
the way and not try to "coordinate" the explosive innovations in
information technology.
Congressional Action
Although the House and Senate have yet to agree on a final
number, if they choose to split the difference between the two
positions, the Commission's spending will be cut by 30 percent,
from $901,000 in 1995 to $639,000 in 1996.
Five-Year Savings
$1.5 million (assuming final funding midway between the levels
voted by each chamber)
White House Action
The appropriations bill that includes these changes is stalled
in the Senate.
North-South Center
Purpose
Promotes better relations between the United States, the
nations of Latin America and the Caribbean, and Canada by bringing
together scholars and students for cooperative study, training, and
research.
Rationale for Termination
This program should be terminated in favor of long-standing
activities of the State Department designed to sustain and improve
relations within the Western Hemisphere. Improved commercial links,
helped by the U.S.-Canada Free Trade Agreement and the NAFTA, and
increased private contacts by business people, academics,
journalists, and tourists render the Center unnecessary.
Congressional Action
Congress cut the Center's budget in half, saving $2 million
this year.
Five-Year Savings
Estimated at $11 million.
White House Action
President Clinton vetoed the appropriations bill which included
these cuts.
Agencies That Escaped Significant Cuts
Commission for the Preservation of America's Heritage Abroad
Purpose
Encourages the preservation of cemeteries, monuments, and
historic buildings associated with the foreign heritage of the
United States.
Rationale for Termination or Consolidation
To reduce overhead and administrative cost, this task should be
handled through the Foreign Service and cultural attaches in
relevant U.S. embassies, using local contractors as
appropriate.
Congressional Action
Congress chose to maintain spending at last year's level.
Five-Year Savings
None.
White House Action
President Clinton vetoed the appropriations bill which included
the Commission's funding.
Commission of Fine Arts
Purpose
Advises the President, Congress, and department heads on
matters of architecture, sculpture, painting, and other fine arts,
particularly as they relate to the appearance of the nation's
capital.
Rationale for Termination
Congress already has its long-standing office of the Architect
of the Capitol, whose skills, resources, and capabilities are more
than adequate to the task of providing advisory services, either
directly or through referral, for Members of Congress, the
President, or any Cabinet head needing expert guidance and advice
on the fine arts. The Commission does not create art; it reviews
and judges the work of others, a role best played by the public at
large at no cost to the taxpayer.
Congressional Action
Congress chose to maintain spending at last year's level,
despite the fact that the Commission's $834,000 budget is applied
only to salaries and administrative expenses.
Five-Year Savings
None.
White House Action
President Clinton vetoed the appropriations bill which included
the Commission's funding.
Commission on Civil Rights
Purpose
Engages in studies concerning areas in which there may be
denials of civil rights, and reports on these matters to the
President and Congress.
Rationale for Termination or Consolidation
The Commission replicates the civil rights responsibilities of
the federal government's many other civil rights offices, as
described in the introduction to this study.
Congressional Action
Congress has cut the Commission's $9 million budget by only 3
percent and has not consolidated its operations with those of any
other federal civil rights offices.
Five-Year Savings
None.
White House Action
President Clinton vetoed the appropriations bill that included
funding for the Commission.
Corporation for Public
Broadcasting
Purpose
Provides grants to qualified public television and radio
stations, to be used at their discretion for purposes related to
program production and acquisition. The Corporation was established
in 1968 to provide additional programming and support to the
nation's non-commercial radio and television stations. Public
broadcasting now includes nearly 600 radio stations and 340
television stations. This extensive nationwide system receives more
than 80 percent of its support from sources other than the federal
government, with contributions from subscribers and business
accounting for its largest and second-largest sources of
income.
Rationale for Termination
The CPB now provides 14 percent of the Public Broadcasting
System's total financial support, the loss of which could be offset
by greater reliance on other financial sources, improved management
and administrative efficiency, and the elimination of low-priority
programming and grant activities. The loss of federal dollars also
could be offset by recouping some of the earnings of the many
profitable production companies which share the subsidy and by
selling commercial air time, particularly in time slots now devoted
to CPB/PBS self-promotion and self-justification. Increasingly,
CPB/PBS quality and content fall short of that available on the
private sector's Arts & Entertainment Network, Discovery
Channel, Learning Channel, and History Channel, as well as the
growing number of competitors to CNN. These networks demonstrate
that quality educational programming can be maintained in a
commercial format and without federal financial support.8
Congressional Action
Unlike most other federal programs, the CPB is funded two years
in advance, and this year's appropriation bills deal with FY 1998
funding. Although the House and Senate have yet to agree on a final
1988 spending target for the Corporation, their proposals either do
not involve much of a reduction or would maintain current funding:
The House proposes an 8 percent cut of $20 million, while the
Senate would freeze the budget at the 1996 level of $260 million.
Differences will not be resolved until a Senate filibuster against
the Labor/HHS appropriations bill is broken.
Three-Year Savings
As high as $30 million (assuming the House and Senate split the
difference); as high as $750 million (if the program is
terminated).
White House Action
Necessary legislation is stalled in the Senate.
Defense Nuclear Facilities Board
Purpose
Responsible for evaluating the content and implementation of
standards related to defense nuclear facilities of the Department
of Energy. Also investigates events or practices at defense nuclear
facilities that may affect public health adversely.
Rationale for Termination or Consolidation
The Board is one of five independent agencies concerned with
nuclear safety issues, as described in the introduction to this
study. It should be consolidated with one of the other independent
bodies concerned with nuclear arms and energy to improve
congressional and executive branch oversight at less cost to the
budget.
Congressional Action
Congress has cut the Board's budget by only $900,000, just 5
percent less than last year's $17.9 million.
Five-Year Savings
At least $5 million.
White House Action
President Clinton has signed this into law.
Japan-United States Friendship
Commission
Purpose
Makes grants to promote scholarly, cultural, and artistic
activities between Japan and the United States.
Rationale for Termination
Given the extensive business, cultural, academic, diplomatic,
and political relationships between the United States and Japan,
there is no shortage of interaction between the citizens and
institutions of these two countries. The Friendship Commission's
activities are both redundant and a waste of money.
Congressional Action
Both houses of Congress have voted to maintain the Commission
at $1.2 million, the same level of spending as last year.
Five-Year Savings
None.
White House Action
President Clinton has vetoed the appropriations bill that
included these cuts.
Franklin Delano Roosevelt Memorial
Commission
Purpose
To formulate plans for a memorial to FDR.
Rationale for Termination
Before his death, President Roosevelt requested that any
memorial to him be simple, no larger than his desk, and placed near
the National Archives. Although this request was fulfilled many
years ago, Congress has persisted in trying to erect something
grander. It should honor President Roosevelt by adhering to his
request.
Congressional Action
Notwithstanding FDR's request, the Memorial Commission is the
only one of the 36 independent agencies discussed in this study to
receive an increase in its budget -- in this case an increase of
more than 200 percent to $147,000.
Five-Year Savings
None; instead, taxpayers face a rise in spending of as much as
$500,000 over the next five years if this is sustained.
White House Action
President Clinton vetoed the legislation that included this
increase.
National Capital Planning
Commission
Purpose
Central planning agency for the federal government in the
national capital.
Rationale for Termination
Washington, D.C., is unique among U.S. cities in having a
federally funded planning commission to help guide its development.
Whatever expertise this commission may bring to bear, however the
economic and social environment of Washington still continues to
deteriorate. In any case, planning activities should be undertaken
by the D.C. government.
Congressional Action
Congress would reduce the Commission's budget by only 9 percent
to $5.09 million from last year's $5.65 million. This is in marked
contrast to Congress's termination of the similarly mandated
Pennsylvania Avenue Redevelopment Commission.
Five-Year Savings
Estimated at $2.8 million.
White House Action
President Clinton vetoed the appropriations bill which included
these cuts.
Neighborhood Reinvestment
Corporation
Purpose
Performs a number of functions intended to reverse neighborhood
decline, develop housing strategies, and replicate successful
neighborhood preservation strategies.
Rationale for Termination
Programs of the Corporation duplicate those of HUD,
particularly now that HUD has established its Empowerment Zones and
Enterprise Communities program to focus resources more precisely on
impoverished neighborhoods.
Congressional Action
Congress voted to maintain last year's funding of $38.7 million
despite the Corporation's duplication of HUD's $4 billion Community
Development Block Grant program. Congress should revisit the issue
and apply to it the same standards it applied to the now-terminated
FDIC Affordable Housing Program.
Five-Year Savings
None.
White House Action
President Clinton has vetoed the appropriations bill which
included these cuts.
Nuclear Waste Technical Review
Board
Purpose
To evaluate the technical and scientific validity of the
activities of the Department of Energy's nuclear waste disposal
program.
Rationale for Termination or Consolidation
As with the Defense Nuclear Facilities Board, the
responsibilities of this Board should be consolidated with those of
another nuclear safety agency or department, as indicated in the
introduction to this study.
Congressional Action
Congress chose to maintain the status quo by making no change
in prior year spending.
Five-Year Savings
None.
White House Action
President Clinton has signed this into law.
Office of Government Ethics
Purpose
Provides overall direction of executive branch policies
designed to prevent conflicts of interest and ensure high ethical
standards.
Rationale for Termination
Recent significant ethical lapses within the executive branch
and Congress suggest that the Office has been less than effective
in imposing a higher ethical standard on government officials,
notwithstanding the more than $8 million it spent in the last
fiscal year. The enhancement of ethical conduct should be internal
to each agency, and the monitoring of ethical standards should be
the direct responsibility of the inspector general and general
counsel of each department and agency. This ineffective Office
should be terminated.
Congressional Action
Despite this office's ineffectiveness, Congress has reduced its
budget by only 5 percent to $7.7 million in 1996.
Five-Year Savings
Estimated at $2.4 million.
White House Action
President Clinton has signed this into law.
TERMINATION AND CONSOLIDATION
OBJECTIVES FOR THE FY 1997 BUDGET
While this analysis recommends the abolition of just 41 of
the approximately 130 independent agencies, this should not be
construed as endorsing the activities of the other agencies or
their current levels of federal funding. These 41 agencies were
chosen as best representing those that could and should be
terminated. Many others should be subjected to close examination,
funding reductions, fundamental reform, or abolition according to
the criteria outlined in this study. In most cases, agencies
excluded from the current list are of a size and significance that
require more exhaustive analysis. Among these, the Small Business
Administration, General Services Administration, and Federal
Communications Commission are just a few of the remaining
independent agencies that should be reviewed by Congress for
termination, substantial cutbacks, or major reform.
In , Heritage Foundation analysts systematically
reviewed many of the larger independent agencies, as well as the
many divisions and offices within the Cabinet agencies. That study
made numerous recommendations for program termination,
privatization, consolidation, and reform, and many of these
recommendations were adopted by the appropriations committees when
they proposed the termination of 259 programs in last year's
appropriations bills. Many were not, however, and those that were
overlooked during last year's attempt at budget reform should be
revisited this year as potential candidates for restructuring or
elimination.
Endnotes:
- See Ronald D. Utt, "Closing Unneeded and
Obsolete Independent Government Agencies," Heritage Foundation
Backgrounder No. 1015, January 25, 1995.
- These are the five scholarship trust
funds honoring distinguished Americans. Provided with a trust fund
when created, they are not subject to annual congressional
appropriations or authorization.
- Scott A. Hodge, ed., Rolling Back Government: A Budget Plan to Rebuild
America (Washington, D.C.: The Heritage Foundation,
1995).
- See House Appropriations Committee news
release, "Appropriations Panel Fulfills Commitment to Cut
Government," December 1995, for a complete listing of program
terminations and major cutbacks as well as projected FY 1996
savings for each.
- See John S. Barry, "How to Close Down
the Department of Energy," Heritage Foundation Backgrounder,
No. 1061, November 9, 1995, for a review of some of the costly
and inefficient nuclear issues offices within the Department.
- See Peter Eisler, "$59 million 'Lemon':
Is the Nuclear Waste Study Worth the Paper Its Printed On?" USA
Today, February 15, 1996, p. 1A.
- See Kenneth F. Boehm and Peter T.
Flaherty, "Why the Legal Services Corporation Must Be Abolished,"
Heritage Foundation Backgrounder No.
1057, October 18, 1995.
- See Laurence Jarvik, "Big Bird Goes Cold
Turkey," Policy Review, No. 72 (Spring 1995), p. 16