"Now, what I tried before [enactment of
the Clinton health plan] won't work.
Maybe we can do it in another way.
That's what we've tried to do, a step at a
time, until we finish this."
-President Bill Clinton,
speech to the Service Employees International Union,
Washington, D.C., September 15, 1997
Four years ago, Congress soundly
rejected the Clinton health plan. Since then, however, it has
quietly adopted many key elements of that plan. Now Congress is
considering more elements.
It is time to take a different route. To ensure that its health
care reform efforts meet the needs of the greatest number of
Americans, Congress should measure the merits of proposals against
a basic commonsense standard. Any plan that would create a new
federal health care subsidy program, expand an existing program, or
include mandated benefits or access should meet this overriding
standard: It should empower individuals and families to decide for
themselves which health care options to choose. They should not
give that power to their employers or to the government-that would
only help accomplish the vision of the original Clinton health
plan.
The key step now is to end the bias in the tax code favoring
employer-purchased health coverage at the expense of individual
coverage.
Short of ending the tax exclusion for employer-provided health
plans, there are several steps Congress can take to lay a solid
foundation for a truly consumer-based health care system in
America. Specifically, any new health care policy should:
-
Encourage employers to disclose
the value of their health benefits plan to employees.
-
Allow individuals to opt out of
their employer-provided health coverage. This could be done, for
example, by requiring employers to give employees the chance to opt
in or out of the employer-provided health plan when they are hired
and giving employees who choose to opt out the same tax break they
would have had under an employment-based plan, or by allowing
individuals who do not like the employer-provided health plan to
cash out the tax-free value of their employer-provided health
benefits and use that money to buy a health plan of their
choice.
-
Require that any health plan
covering an employee who chooses to stay in the employer-provided
health plan obtain the employee's signature on a contract agreeing
to the terms and conditions of the plan.
-
Allow individuals who do not
have health coverage through their place of employment to deduct
the full cost of an individual health plan from their taxes.
-
Require that limitations on
type, duration, and scope of the covered benefits and providers are
specified clearly in contracts with individuals.
-
Allow individual workers in
company-sponsored health care flexible spending accounts (FSAs) to
roll over unused funds in these accounts, penalty-free, at the end
of the year.
-
Remove or raise limits on
individual contributions to FSAs.
Congress took nine months to air the intricate and confusing
details of the original Clinton health plan, and a resounding
plurality of Americans registered their opposition to it. They saw
it as a dramatic attempt to shift private dollars and
decision-making authority away from families and individuals to the
federal government. Under pressure from the Clinton Administration,
recent legislation implements central elements of the Clinton plan.
It is time for Congress to take a different direction.
Carrie J. Gavora is the Health Care Policy Analyst at The
Heritage Foundation.