Last month, Sen. Pete Domenici (R-NM) proposed that the payroll taxes devoted to social security be suspended for the month of December in order to strengthen the nation's sagging economy. Both employers and employees each pay 6.2 percent of earnings to fund the program, up to the current 2001 wage cap of $80,400.

The Domenici proposal is bad policy for America on three basic levels.

1. The Domenici Plan will not increase employment.
The Department of Labor reports that some 887,000 workers have lost their jobs between March and October, but none of them will be rehired into permanent jobs because of a one-month holiday. Only the prospect of putting tax money permanently back into businesses will induce them to invest, expand, and hire more workers, and if individuals can save more of their tax dollars, then they may be able to open up their own businesses and employ their own workers.

Employers know that this idea is little more than a very short-term gimmick.

2. The Domenici Plan will not stimulate the economy.
The hope is that people will spend the tax holiday proceeds on new purchases, increasing consumption, which in turn drives the economy forward. The last time this was tried, though, Americans were largely unwilling to do that.

About the time the summer tax rebate checks were issued, ABCNEWS and the Washington Post conducted a poll, asking people how the checks would be spent. They found that the overwhelming majority of families - over seventy percent - would do something other than spend the money on new purchases.

Newly revised data released by the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA), a division of the Commerce Department, confirm this. Personal consumption expenditures between June and July 2001 (on an annualized basis) increased less than $18 billion while savings increased more than $110 billion. Consumption between July and August 2001 increased slightly more than $10 billion, but savings increased by more than $135 billion. Because of the way BEA makes the calculation, total savings includes money used to pay down existing debt.

In short, if the Domenici legislation is enacted, most people will not spend it; rather, they will pay down debts or save it, just like they did last summer.

3. The Domenici Plan is a shell game and little more than redistributionary tax policy.
The Heritage Center for Data Analysis estimates that a December 2001 tax holiday will cost the social security trust fund nearly $44 billion. If the tax holiday is postponed until January 2002, the cost will balloon to over $52 billion since those individuals earning more than the social security wage cap will be able to take advantage of the holiday in 2002.

Sen. Domenici pledges that the federal government's general revenue will cover all losses to the social security trust fund. While this may sound appealing, this is simply a shell game, and these billions of dollars must come from somewhere. The $44 billion will first come from more deficit spending, since the surplus dried up because of the economic downturn and spending on programs related to September 11. The national debt will someday be paid off with revenue from individual and corporate taxes. These taxes, then, are paid by the middle and upper classes to replenish the trust fund that is used to pay retirees, who typically pay very little in taxes.

In short, this plan is nothing more than a Keynesian redistribution scheme that steals from Peter to pay Paul.

Instead of relying on gimmicks to spur the economy, Congress should enact real reforms in the tax and social security areas: