The
Bush Administration is asking Congress for $16 million in
assistance for Indonesia: $8 million for "humanitarian and
peacekeeping" operations and $8 million to train a
"counterterrorism unit" there. This would be added to a $17.9
million program under the Defense Department Appropriations Act
(P.L. 107-117) that allows Indonesian military officers to "attend
U.S. military educational institutions and selected regional
centers for non-lethal training."
Such
initiatives, which do not compromise an existing ban on U.S.
military-to-military engagement with the Indonesian military (the
Tentara Nasional Indonesia, or TNI), can improve Indonesia's
assistance in the war on terrorism and provide an incentive for
military reform. Though the exact details of the exchanges are not
yet final, the funded activities should include intelligence
sharing, enhanced military participation in the war on terrorism,
and joint training exercises between U.S. and Indonesian civilian
police.
Restrictions on
Military Engagement with Indonesia. Since 1992, Congress
has imposed a variety of restrictions on U.S. military cooperation
with Indonesia because of the TNI's history of disregard for human
rights. All military ties were severed in September 1999 after the
TNI had orchestrated several massacres in an attempt to influence
East Timor's vote on independence.
In
the Foreign Operations Appropriations Act of 2002 (P.L. 105-115),
Congress linked the restoration of normal military relations to,
among other things, Indonesia's ability "to bring to justice
members of the armed forces and militia groups against whom there
is credible evidence of human rights violations in East Timor."
Although some suspects have been tried, even most supporters of
renewed ties with Indonesia's military concede that the
high-ranking officers who were responsible for ordering the
atrocities have yet to be arrested, let alone charged with a
criminal offense. Indonesia also has failed to demonstrate a
"commitment to civilian control of the armed forces"; the TNI
remains largely accountable only to itself.
For
these reasons, the existing bans on military-to-military relations
in the form of international military education training (IMET) and
foreign military financing (FMF) are valid. Depriving Indonesia of
normal military relations provides an incentive for much-needed
reform.
Nevertheless, as Southeast Asia's largest
country and the world's most populous Muslim nation, Indonesia
plays a key role in the war on terrorism. It is home to several
radical Muslim groups, like the Laskar Jihad and Jemaah Islamiah,
known for using terror to achieve their goal of a fundamentalist
Muslim state. Indonesia may therefore be a prime destination for
al-Qaeda members fleeing Afghanistan.
Furthermore, without the cooperation of
Indonesia and its security forces, antiterrorist operations in
Southeast Asia would be severely disadvantaged. As one of 10
members of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), the
most influential multilateral grouping in the region, Indonesia can
veto any measure the group proposes. To engage in any meaningful
regional security cooperation, the United States must gain
Indonesia's collaboration.
Areas of
Targeted Engagement with Indonesia. Indonesia's
contribution to the war on terrorism has been disappointing, given
the terrorist infrastructure that exists there. Renewed training of
Indonesia's military and police forces would allow U.S. personnel
to reinforce the case for Indonesia's assistance in the war on
terrorism.
The
Administration's proposal would provide assistance equally to
Indonesia's police force and to the TNI. Programs to strengthen the
civilian-controlled police force will eventually permit the police
to assume full responsibility for domestic security, gradually
moving the TNI out of its assumed role of internal defense toward a
preferred role of external defense.
Many
ASEAN members feel that Indonesia's status as a pariah at
international security conferences damages ASEAN's ability to lead
regional events and proscribes Indonesia's participation in
security activities. A renewal of U.S. military cooperation would,
to some degree, help to restore Indonesia's image and give ASEAN a
new purpose.
For
Jakarta, good relations with the United States is far more
important to long-term national interests than the illusory benefit
of courting Islamic extremists. Indonesia's political elite and
security forces need that relationship with the United States and
will eventually conform to international norms to get it. Limited
U.S. military cooperation would keep the door to normalization
open. The Bush Administration can work with Jakarta with some
optimism that Indonesia will take the high road toward security in
order to rejoin the world community.
What to
Do. To comply with the current ban on military-to-military
cooperation with Indonesia, the Bush proposals are very specific or
contain precise restrictions on the nature of activities to be
undertaken. The Administration should continue to exercise caution
in crafting joint training exercises to enhance Indonesia's
participation in the war on terrorism. To secure Indonesia's
cooperation, the Administration should:
- Encourage
civilian leadership of the military. The principal
difference between the TNI and the armed forces in stable Southeast
Asian countries is civilian control. All Washington-funded projects
should include oversight and management by the civilian officials
in Jakarta.
- Ensure that all
participants in joint exercises have not participated in TNI human
rights abuses. U.S. and Australian intelligence services
should ensure that American money is not being used to train the
wrong people, which would tarnish the training program.
- Direct the
Pentagon to consult regularly with Congress. After
Congress suspended military relations with Indonesia in 1992, the
Department of Defense continued to maintain cooperation with
Indonesia's special forces. When Congress learned of it, many felt
the Pentagon had violated the spirit if not the letter of
congressional restrictions. Consulting closely with Congress will
help to obviate lingering suspicions among some Members.
Conclusion. The Bush Administration's
proposal to provide $8 million to train a "counterterrorism unit"
in Indonesia is appropriately modest and contains sufficient
safeguards to protect the integrity of the congressional ban on
military-to-military cooperation. At the same time, it would help a
new, more responsible relationship to develop within this
strategically critical country in the war on terrorism.
--Dana R. Dillon is
Senior Policy Analyst for Southeast Asia in the Asian Studies
Center at The Heritage Foundation.