The House
Committee on Government Reform approved the D.C. Parental Choice
Incentive Act on July 10. The bill would enable low-income parents
in the District of Columbia to enroll their children in private
schools through a scholarship program administered by the U.S.
Department of Education.
The need for this
reform is clear: Just 6 percent of D.C. 4th graders are proficient
in math, and only 10 percent are proficient in reading. Under the
bill, the maximum scholarship is $7,500, and the total authorized
for the program is $15 million. The U.S. Secretary of Education
must conduct an annual evaluation of the program to present to
Congress.
Positive
Pilot Program
Given the failure
of other reforms to improve the city's poor academic achievement
and the growing recognition that additional funding alone will not
improve the system, Congress has an historic opportunity to support
D.C. students by authorizing the vouchers and funding the
scholarship program through the appropriations process.
This pilot program
will offer students access to higher-performing independent
schools, provide an incentive for improving the public school
system, and present an opportunity for further study of the effects
of choice on students' academic progress and parental
satisfaction.
Support for Parental
Choice
Since President George W. Bush announced
a voucher plan for the District of Columbia and other communities
in his fiscal year (FY) 2004 budget, several prominent D.C. leaders
have voiced their support for vouchers, including Mayor Anthony A.
Williams (D) and D.C. School Board President Peggy Cooper
Cafritz.
"We've got a model we've been using for
140 years. I think it's time to try something else," Mayor Williams
explained, in an interview with The Washington
Post.
Kevin P. Chavous (D), member of the D.C.
Council and chairman of its Committee on Education, Libraries, and
Recreation, backs vouchers as part of a proposal to increase
support for charter schools and traditional schools. According to
Chavous, "No school bureaucracy will reform itself internally. It
only comes through pressure. And the most effective form of
pressure is choice."
Despite per-pupil expenditures of more
than $11,000, some of the lowest levels of achievement among public
school students exist in the nation's capital: 94 percent of 4th
grade students are not proficient in math, and 90 percent lack
proficiency in reading, according to the National Assessment of
Educational Progress (NAEP).
The results are similar for 8th graders.
Many children will never catch up; as few as 59 percent of the
District's students graduate from high school.
The demand for choice is evident in the city's higher-than-average
charter school attendance and participation in private scholarship
programs. There are hundreds of private schools in the D.C. metro
area, most with tuitions that are less than the per-pupil
expenditure in public schools.
Research Supporting Parental
Choice
Research strongly
suggests that publicly funded vouchers would also improve the
academic achievement of D.C. students. Researchers at Harvard and
Georgetown universities found improved academic achievement and
higher parental satisfaction for African-American students who used
privately funded scholarships through the Washington Scholarship
Fund.
A February 2000 study of 810 students
who received the Washington Scholarship Fund scholarships found
that, after one year, African-American students in grades 2 to 5
who transferred to private schools outperformed their public school
counterparts by 7 percentage points on math tests and 3 points on
reading tests. The study also found that, while nearly half of the
parents of private school students gave their children's schools an
"A," only 15 percent of the parents of public school students did
likewise.
An August 2000 study of students in
grades 2 to 8 reported that African-American students in the
District of Columbia, New York City, and Dayton, Ohio, had
outscored their public school classmates since transferring to
private schools with the help of privately funded vouchers. The
report compared public and private school students who had similar
family backgrounds. D.C. students who had transferred showed the
greatest advances, moving 9 percentile points ahead of their public
school peers in combined reading and math test scores.
According to NAEP
test results, parochial school students consistently achieve at a
higher rate than their peers in public schools.Research by Heritage
Foundation Analyst Kirk Johnson, Ph.D., using NAEP data, confirms
this trend for African-American students in the District and shows
that, on average, a black 8th grader in a Catholic school
outperforms 72 percent of his or her public school peers.
Other research on existing programs
shows that school choice improves the public school system.
In a recent study, Harvard
professor Caroline Hoxby found that increased school choice raises
school productivity and student achievement within the public
school system. Hoxby's report found that competition from charter
schools in Michigan and Arizona, and from Milwaukee's voucher
program, has compelled public schools to raise their productivity,
as measured by students' achievement gains.
In October 2002,
Manhattan Institute scholars released a study of the impact of
school choice on the academic achievement of public school students
in Milwaukee and San Antonio. After controlling for demographic
characteristics such as race and income level, and for differences
in expenditures, the authors found increased academic achievement
in public schools that had been exposed to competition from private
school scholarship programs and charter schools.
A 2001 Manhattan
Institute analysis of the Florida A+ program found that vouchers
provided a strong incentive for schools to improve. In Florida,
schools receive grades ranging from "A" to "F," based on the
proportion of students who pass the state's proficiency tests.
Students who attend schools that receive a failing grade twice
within a four-year period can receive a voucher to attend another
public or private school of choice. The study found that schools
receiving an "F" improved when they were faced with the prospect of
vouchers.
History of Parental Choice in D.C.
On November 2, 1995,
the U.S. House of Representatives passed a voucher proposal for
students in the District of Columbia as an amendment to the FY 1996
D.C. appropriations bill (H.R. 2546).
The amendment, proposed by
then-Representative Steve Gunderson (R-WI), would have provided
funding for charter schools, would have given $3,000 vouchers to
students whose family income fell below the poverty level, and
would have provided $1,500 vouchers to students whose family
incomes did not exceed 180 percent of the poverty level. The
vouchers would have been redeemable at a public, private, or
religious school in the District or surrounding counties in
Virginia and Maryland.
Although Representative Gunderson's
voucher proposal died in the U.S. Senate following a filibuster led
by Senator Edward Kennedy (D-MA), a charter school plan that
Gunderson sponsored was passed.
Consideration of a D.C. school choice
plan was revived when a bipartisan Senate team introduced the D.C.
Student Opportunity Scholarship Act of 1997. Representative Richard
Armey (R-TX) introduced similar legislation in the
House.
The legislation would have provided
scholarships of up to $3,200 for the District's poorest students in
kindergarten through 12th grade to attend a public, private, or
religious school of choice in the metropolitan area. The Senate
approved the bill by voice vote on November 9, 1997, and the House
passed it by a vote of 214 to 206 on April 30, 1998. However,
President Bill Clinton vetoed the measure in May 1998.
Three days after the President's veto,
The Washington Post published the results of a May 1998 poll
of District residents that found significant support for using
federal dollars to send children to private or religious schools:
65 percent of the District's African-Americans surveyed who had
incomes under $50,000 favored the option. Overall, 56 percent of
District residents supported school choice.
Congress Should Approve Vouchers
for D.C.
Congress can help
poor families in the District of Columbia gain access to schools of
excellence by approving vouchers for D.C. The need for this reform
is clear: Just 6 percent of D.C. 4th graders are proficient in
math, and only 10 percent are proficient in reading.
Research on
privately funded vouchers in the District and on private and
publicly funded programs nationwide has shown school choice to be
beneficial to students and to the public system. Eleven states
currently have publicly funded vouchers or tax credit programs. The
U.S. Supreme Court has upheld vouchers as constitutional, thereby
opening the door to new programs. Congress should wait
no longer to bring this critical reform to the ailing school system
in the nation's capitol.