In his State of
the Union address, President George W. Bush declared, "A government
run health care system is the wrong prescription. By keeping costs
under control, expanding access, and helping more Americans afford
coverage, we will preserve the system of private medicine that
makes America's health care system the best in the world." In
furtherance of this agenda, the President outlined a series of
health policy measures: tax free insurance premiums for the new
Health Savings Accounts, refundable tax credits for the uninsured,
the creation of association health plans, and $100 million for
demonstrations in health care information technology.
Health Savings Accounts
With the recent
enactment of a provision of the Medicare law, Health Savings
Accounts are available to the under-65 population, an estimated 250
million Americans. Under the terms of the law, individuals can
contribute up to $2600 and families up to $5,150 in a health
savings account, accompanied by an insurance policy with a
deductible of at least $1000 for an individual and $2000 for a
family policy. The account can earn interest tax free, and any
unused funds can be rolled over year to year and accumulate
tax-free. The funds can be used for out of pocket medical expenses,
insurance premiums during spells of unemployment, and medical
expenses in retirement.
Martin Feldstein,
professor of economics at Harvard University, says that the HSA
provision may well be "the most important legislation" of 2003. It
dramatically reforms the tax treatment of medical expenses,
establishes portability of coverage, creates powerful incentives
for doctors and patients to avoid wasteful spending, and restores a
doctor-patient relationship free of third party interference in the
financing and delivery of medical care. While the President's
proposal to allow full deduction for the catastrophic insurance
accompanying HSAs will help solidify their attractiveness, it also
highlights the pressing need for further reform of the tax
treatment of health insurance and the regulation of insurance
products.
Health
Care Tax Credits
To tackle the
challenges of the uninsured, the President offers a tax credit to
individuals without access to employer-based coverage. The
President's proposal, similar to previous years, would be
income-based and on a sliding scale, providing tax credits of up to
$1000 per individual and $3000 per family. The credit should be
refundable, meaning even those that owe no taxes would qualify for
assistance, and advance-able, so that the credit can be applied
directly to health care premiums.
Health care tax
credits can be an effective and efficient way to help lower-income
individuals and families to purchase and own private health care
policies. As recent research has shown, Americans already spend an
estimated $35 billion in uncompensated care for the uninsured.
Furthermore, a universal tax credit approach could help create a
seamless health care system for individuals. So that, regardless of
one's work or work status, an individual could receive a tax break,
similar to the one they receive through the employer-based system,
for purchasing and maintaining their own health care policy. In
addition to tax credits, the federal government should encourage
states to develop affordable, private coverage options to which
individuals can apply the credit.
Association Health Plans
(AHPs)
To address the
pressures small businesses face in growing health care costs, the
President proposes the establishment of Association Health
Plans.
This initiative
would allow individuals and groups to purchase health insurance
from an association of which they are a member. These associations,
meeting solvency and other administrative requirements, would be
able to leverage volume through their memberships and offer health
insurance that is federally regulated, similar to how large
employers operate their health benefits programs.
The proposal is
focused on offering small employers an alternative to costly,
state-regulated health care policies. While AHPs would provide
relief to small businesses, the federal government should also
encourage states to undo costly regulations and establish a more
market friendly environment for small businesses and individuals.
Furthermore, recognizing that employer-based health care does not
work for everyone, the federal government should also emphasize
non-employment based opportunities under AHPs that could lead to
more choices, individual ownership, and real portability of health
care policies.
Medical Malpractice
Reform
The President
correctly highlights the issue of medical malpractice reform again
for 2004. Medical malpractice premiums are skyrocketing,
contributing to the rising cost of health care and forcing many
physicians to give up treating patients, or driving them out of
their practices altogether, thus limiting patients access to
medical treatment. As the President acknowledged, the lawsuit
crisis in many states has little or nothing to do with increases in
bad medical practices, but often results from exotic theories of
legal liability, runaway juries, and absurd state tort rulings.
States are the
best laboratories for tort reform, particularly for medical
malpractice claims that involve parties from only one state.
Congress can play a crucial role in passing the class action reform
legislation that has been pending for several years, but there are
legitimate Constitutional concerns with some malpractice reforms
that would impose uniform federal solutions to large areas of state
tort law. The asserted congressional power to overrule bad state
tort laws presupposes the power (at a later date) to overrule the
state tort reform laws that are good. Nonetheless, Congress should
strongly encourage states to reform their destructive medical
malpractice system in ways that are consistent with the
Constitutional principle of federalism.
Medicare
The President
celebrated the enactment of the new Medicare law, and directly
issued a veto threat against any Congressional proposal that would
"attempt to limit the choices of our seniors, or to take away their
prescription drug coverage under Medicare."
While the new
Medicare law contains certain desirable features, including the
provision of a drug discount card, help for low income seniors and
an improvement of private plan competition under the "Medicare
Advantage" system in 2006, Congress cannot ignore the coming
explosion in Medicare costs and un-funded liabilities, sharply
aggravated by the creation of a massive drug entitlement. Nor can
Congress ignore the displacement of existing private drug coverage
or the acceleration of the loss of employer-based retiree drug
coverage. Moreover, the final version of the Medicare law scuttled
the crucial House reform, scheduled to take effect in 2010, that
would have created a strong competitive system modeled on the
superior federal employees' program, and substituted instead a weak
and vulnerable "premium support" demonstration project confined to
six metropolitan areas.
Members of
Congress are profoundly mistaken if they believe that the new
Medicare law enables them to escape the coming Medicare crisis,
particularly when the baby boom generation starts retiring in just
seven years.