As the finance
ministers of the world's leading economies gather this weekend at
the G-7 meetings in Washington to discuss the global economy,
expect a steady drumbeat of criticism directed at the United States
from France, Germany, and Japan, all seeking to divert attention
from their lack of economic growth. Contrary to constant
predictions of imminent demise due to trade and budget deficits,
America accounted for 26.3 percent of global economic production in
2002 (constant dollars), the largest share in over three decades. In contrast, Japan and
Western Europe have watched their own economies stagnate. The
lesson should be clear: European- and Japanese-style government
intervention-neo-mercantilism, social safety nets, labor
restrictions, and the like-is a barrier to growing
prosperity.
Japan's "Lost
Decade"
The conventional
wisdom of the 1980s was that the Japanese economic model would
dominate the world. Yet, in 1989, Japan's economy was hit hard by a
stock market collapse and entered into a "lost decade" of growth.
Throughout the 1990s, Japan's financial system choked on massive
non-performing loans that the government and the banking system are
still trying to resolve. The result has been artificially low
interest rates but few new loans to new businesses hungry for
capital. The continued strategy of keeping the Yen weak in order to
maintain a trade surplus seems to be another failing strategy of
monetary manipulation.
Japan's real
growth averaged 1.1 percent per year during the decade from 1993 to
2003, compared to America's 3.3 percent growth rate over that
period (see ). Further, Japan's GDP relative to global output is
lower today than in 1973. Bloated government debt towers at over
160 percent of GDP, while banks remain in duress and promises of
reform ring hollow.
Japan's sudden
rebound to 6.4 percent annualized growth in the last quarter of
2003 caused excitement and contributed to a somewhat healthy
average of 2.5 percent for the year. But as Japanese citizens know
all too well, two or three years of growth per decade do not make a
recovery.
The European
Experience
Despite a few
bright exceptions, such as Ireland, Luxembourg, and Portugal, the
EU-15 countries as a group have experienced weak growth since the
end of the Cold War, averaging compound growth of only 1.8 percent
since 1990. The EU's share of the global economy over the past
three decades has declined steadily. Today, its share is more than
6 percentage points below its 1973 share and nearly 2 percentage
points below its 1992 share (see Charts 2a
and 2b). The decline has been particularly serious in France
and Germany due to constrictive labor markets, over-regulation,
high taxes, and exorbitant government or government-mandated
pension and health programs.
"Barriers to Riches"
Japan and the two
major European economies, Germany and France, have experienced poor
growth for a reason: their resistance to free market reform.
Economists by Stephen Parente and Edward Prescott argue eloquently
that many nations establish "barriers to riches" (the title of
their 2000 book) when they attempt to protect special interests and
sectors within their countries.
The Heritage
Foundation's 2004 Index of Economic Freedom confirms a
strong, positive relationship between economic freedom and per
capita GDP. The Index reveals that a country's average GDP
growth rate increases as the country's economic freedom score
improves.
Moreover, the inverse relationship is true: countries that ignore
economic freedom grow slowly, limiting future job opportunities.It
is no coincidence that "free countries" in the Index tend to
experience higher rates of growth than less-free developed
countries.
Overburdened with
high tax rates, spending, and regulation, Japan, France, and
Germany are ranked only "mostly free" in the Index (the
38th, 44th, and 18th freest
economies, respectively).
Their relative lack of freedom inhibits growth. Moreover, Japan's
workforce has declined since 1995, and European populations are
expected to decline sharply due to low birthrates. Because of their aging
demographics, these nations face pension crises in the near future
when social spending will increase sharply. Absent fundamental
pension reform or an unlikely reverse in population trends, these
countries will be forced to drastically increase taxes to fund
those pensions, further constraining economic growth. While America
faces similar crises in its Social Security and Medicare programs
that must be addressed, its situation is not as pressing as those
of the EU and Japan because its economy is growing more strongly
and America's population is younger and increasing.
Japanese and
European societies have essentially chosen to grow slowly, and this
action not only impacts their own immediate prosperity, but also
U.S. economic performance, by shrinking the global economy below
its potential.
For example, the U.S. recovery from the 2001 recession has been
primarily driven by internal factors.
The Answer is Economic Freedom
America faces many
challenges itself but is, on balance, much freer and stronger
economically than other advanced nations. Japan and Europe should
serve as cautionary tales to advocates of trade protectionism and
government planning.
While poor
economic performance has spurred some small changes and forced
consideration of more substantial reform, France, Germany, and
Japan have only scratched the surface of needed change. The
political pressure to cling to anti-growth policies will only
increase as rapidly aging populations in these countries become
more resistant to proposals that affect their pensions. It is more
important than ever that modest growth over the next year and
beyond not be allowed to lead to further complacency and lack of
reform in Japan and the EU.
The United States
serves as an example of success through economic freedom. It is an
example that is getting harder and harder for other advanced
nations to ignore. For its own benefit and the benefit of all
nations, the United States should encourage policies conducive to
steady, long-term economic growth in developing and developed
economies alike. The G-7 meeting of finance ministers in Washington
this weekend would be an excellent forum for this vital
message.
Brett D. Schaefer is Research Fellow in International
Regulatory Affairs, Balbina Y. Hwang is Policy Analyst in the Asian
Studies Center, and Tim Kane is Research Fellow in the Center for
Data Analysis, at The Heritage Foundation.