Youth gangs have
been a familiar part of American urban life since the American
Revolution. Today, because of their growing size and
globalization, they also pose a serious threat to public
security. Groups that began in Los Angeles during the 1960s
and 1980s now have fraternal links to an estimated 130,000 to
300,000 members in Mexico and Central America and have spread to
cities and small towns across the United States.
Their activities range
from fighting rivals to armed robbery, extortion, alien smuggling,
and arms and drug trafficking. Domestic anti-gang policies
should seek to stabilize gang neighborhoods through migration
reforms, to deny time and space to delinquent activities, and to
improve coordination among law enforcement agencies. In Mexico
and Central America, U.S. engagement should promote family
cohesiveness, the rule of law, economic reforms to boost
employment, and cooperative security links to track gang member
migration.
Gangs
Everywhere. Youth gangs are a growing
phenomenon in the United States, Mexico, and Central America. The
number of U.S. cities reporting gang activity went from 270 in
1970 to more than 2,500 in 1998-an increase of more than 800
percent. In 2002, a national survey of law enforcement
agencies revealed that there were some 731,500 active gang members
in the United States, mostly in large cities.
Unstable neighborhoods,
broken homes, learning problems, violent role models, and
access to drugs feed gang growth. A long-term study conducted
in Seattle found that children affected by these factors are two to
four times more likely to join gangs. Historically, poor
migrants-whether from another city or overseas-often settle first
in marginal neighborhoods. For children with no parents, a single
parent, or both parents working, gangs may offer stability and
identity where integration and acceptance are
unlikely.
International
Links. As
a consequence of a large Hispanic influx that began in the 1970s,
Latino gangs now predominate. The Calle 18 and Mara
Salvatrucha, gangs that originated in Los Angeles, are the most
notorious and widespread.
After the Salvadoran
government and rebels signed a peace accord in 1992 and after the
conclusion of the Guatemalan peace process in 1996, the United
States began deporting undocumented Central Americans, especially
those convicted of crimes in the United States. The newly organized
civilian police forces in El Salvador and Guatemala were barely
able to deal with the rampant delinquency caused by
demobilized combatants, much less the deported criminals. Honduras
faced a similar problem even though it did not have a war:
Many Honduran youth left in the 1980s to seek jobs in the United
States. Those who ran afoul of the law were likewise
deported.
In the mid-1990s,
Colombian drug traffickers arrived to expand smuggling routes in
Central America. Yet U.S. lawmakers cut support for regional
justice reforms and police training, believing that peace and
democracy had been achieved.
Growing
Tentacles. Increasing flows of
undocumented migrants across porous borders,
deportations, and improved transportation and communication
systems have helped to fuel the international expansion of Calle 18
and Salvatrucha. Los Angeles remains their major hub of
activity, and they have members in almost every state, contributing
to a rise in violent assaults.
In Mexico, Salvatruchas
ambush, rob, and kill Central American migrants on their way to the
U.S. border. In El Salvador, Calle 18 and Salvatrucha sell drugs,
traffic in arms, and fence cars stolen in the United States. In
Honduras, the murder rate has jumped by 50 percent in the past two
years, with many of the killings attributable to gangs.
Operating from Nicaragua
to the United States, gangs are sought by transnational drug and
arms traffickers for their expertise in crossing the U.S. border.
Last year, there were unsubstantiated rumors that an al-Qaeda cell
leader met with Salvatruchas in Mexico and Honduras,
supposedly to seek help in smuggling terrorists into the United
States.
The Need for a
Comprehensive, Sustained Effort. Some communities have
attempted to reform entire gangs, but in doing so have increased
their cohesiveness. Others have conducted massive roundups
that cleaned up the streets only temporarily. Research shows that
sustained efforts work best when police partner with other
local agencies. However, the larger process that fuels gang growth
requires both national and international coordination. U.S.
policymakers at all levels should:
-
Promote stable
neighborhoods through
collaboration among federal and local law enforcement agencies
to minimize characteristics that induce
delinquency;
-
Reduce illegal
immigration through
stronger border zone controls to filter out undocumented
migrants more effectively and through policies that simplify entry
and exit for documented legal workers and
visitors;
-
Deny time and space for gang
activities through
private-public partnerships to expand youth activities that promote
integration, competition, and self-fulfillment;
and
-
Employ multi-agency,
multi-strategy policing to rein in gang violence by partnering
police, probation officers, social workers, and community leaders
in the same quest.
Internationally, to curb
transnational gang mayhem, U.S. policy should:
-
Help to open market
economies by
supporting foreign projects that foster economic reform,
property rights, and the growth of new industry;
-
Strengthen the rule of
law by bolstering
support for judicial reform in Mexico and Central
America;
-
Promote family-friendly
policies to improve
education and keep families together; and
-
Cooperate with partner
countries by sharing
intelligence on gangs, in processing deportees, and by helping them
to strengthen their own borders through database sharing and
training immigration and customs personnel.
Conclusion.
Like crime, youth
gang activity can be reduced but never eliminated. However, its
potency can be reduced at home and abroad by focusing efforts on
the systems and factors that feed gang activity.
Stephen
Johnson is Senior Policy Analyst for Latin America
in the Douglas and Sarah Allison Center for Foreign Policy Studies,
a division of the Kathryn and Shelby Cullom Davis Institute for
International Studies, and David B.
Muhlhausen, Ph.D., is Senior Policy Analyst in the Center for
Data Analysis at The Heritage Foundation.