On April 5, 2005,
the Georgetown Public Policy Institute released its first of
several reports on the D.C. Opportunity Scholarship Program. The
100+ page report describes the characteristics of the initial group
of participating students and their families and offers important
first-year comparative data. Moreover, the report provides
important early evidence that the Washington, D.C., program is
on-track for the type of positive results seen in other choice
programs. Congress and the Bush Administration should continue to
support this program and its statistical evaluation, which is
critical to gauge success.
The major findings
of this first-year evaluation report include:
-
In total, 1,027
low-income children received and used scholarships in the first
year that they were available, representing a 75 percent
scholarship usage rate.
The average family of students who applied to the program had an
income of $18,742 in 2003.
-
Fifty-eight
schools participated in this initial year, more than half of all
private schools located in the District of Columbia.
Some 70 percent of
these schools charged tuition that is at or below the program's
$7,500 maximum scholarship amount,
with most charging
$5,500 or less per year.
-
Most of the
private schools participating in the program (51 percent) are
affiliated with the Catholic Church.
About 61 percent of the
program's students enrolled in a Catholic school.
Background
On January 22,
2004, Congress passed the D.C. School Choice Incentive Act of 2003,
which established a $14 million program to provide grants for
low-income children to attend private schools in Washington, D.C.
While the program is the first federally funded scholarship program
in America, it is based on other successful public and private
programs in Milwaukee, Cleveland, New York City, and elsewhere.
In order to let
students to take advantage of the scholarships in the fall of 2004,
the program had to be implemented very rapidly. Within just a few
months of the law's passage, the U.S. Department of Education sent
out for bids for program administration (Washington Scholarship
Fund) and evaluation (Georgetown Public Policy Institute),
organized the dozens of participating schools, and communicated
information to parents.
Establishing a new
program that involves so many institutions and individuals is a
considerable challenge-even without the truncated timeline. The
program received 6,000 inquiries about scholarships, about 2,700
students applied, and 1,848 students were deemed eligible. The fact that so many
families participated in the process is a remarkable achievement in
itself.
Still, critics
argue that parents lack interest in the program because there were
unfilled seats during this first year. For example, last summer
D.C. Council member Adrian M. Fenty (D-Ward 4) said, "There is not
a lot of support for vouchers....Where is the onslaught of people
who were supposed to come out and take part in the process?"
But this argument
overlooks the significant interest that parents have expressed in
the D.C. program and the typical pattern of growth in similar
programs. As Rep. Tom Davis (R-VA) has noted, it takes time to
achieve full capacity, even three or four years.
Consider the
example of Milwaukee,
a city that is roughly the same size as Washington, D.C., and uses
similar criteria to determine eligibility. In the first year of
the Milwaukee school choice program (1990-91), only about 300
students participated-but that figure doubled within three years.
Program enrollment jumped again in the 1998-99 academic year when
religious schools were allowed to participate. The Wisconsin
Legislative Fiscal Bureau estimates that, in this academic year,
117 schools in Milwaukee will educate some 14,700 students in the
program,
or nearly 15 percent of the total student population.
The D.C. program
is off to a stronger start than its Milwaukee counterpart was 15
years ago. Not only are there more students participating in the
first year (more than 1,000, compared to about 300 in Milwaukee),
but there are also more schools participating in the D.C.
program-partly because religious schools were allowed from the
outset.
Additionally, the
D.C. program's evaluators believe that the program's second year
will be oversubscribed and that some students will have to be
turned away.
Also, the current year was not undersubscribed across the board,
and it was actually oversubscribed for several grade levels in
middle and high school. In short, it is unlikely that the program
will be undersubscribed again.
Parental Satisfaction with the D.C.
Program
Since this first
evaluation is a "baseline" study, it includes little information
about academic achievement; that will be forthcoming in later
years. What is available now is preliminary information on what the
parents of participating students who attend private schools think
of their children's schools, compared with the perceptions of
parents whose children attend other kinds of schools in Washington.
Consistent with previous studies of similar programs, parents are extremely
happy with private schools in the District:
-
Almost 90
percent of these parents rate their child's private school an A or
B;
-
A higher
proportion of these parents are "very satisfied" on all 10 factors
of parental satisfaction surveyed than public school parents;
-
These parents
report more homework, a safer school environment, and greater
satisfaction with their schools than do public school parents;
and
-
These parents
are far less likely to report serious problems with their child's
school, such as violence or drug and alcohol use.
Conclusion
The D.C.
Opportunity Scholarship program is off to a promising start,
providing "new options and new hope" for D.C.'s schoolchildren, as
House Education and Workforce Committee Chairman John Boehner
(R-OH) put it.
Despite a compressed launch timeline, the program started on
schedule for the 2004-2005 academic year, and more than 1,000
students now have access to this kind of school choice.
Over the next few
years, new information on the academic achievement of participating
children will become available. For now, Congress and the Bush
Administration should continue to support The D.C. Opportunity
Scholarship Program and the efforts of the Georgetown Public Policy
Institute to evaluate it. In time, these evaluations will give
policymakers much more information on the effectiveness of parental
choice programs.
Kirk A.
Johnson, Ph.D., is Senior Policy Analyst in the Center for Data
Analysis at The Heritage Foundation.