The landslide
election victory of Hamas, the Islamic Resistance Movement, is
likely to further destabilize the already anarchic Palestinian
territories, heighten tensions between Israelis and Palestinians,
and kill the comatose peace process. Hamas's electoral triumph is
also a major setback for U.S. Middle East policy, which sought to
encourage the evolution of a peaceful and stable Middle East
through the promotion of democracy as an antidote to terrorism and
unending war. Hamas exploited the popular backlash against the
corrupt authoritarian rule of Yasser Arafat's Fatah movement to
legitimize its own anti-democratic agenda. The Bush Administration
should challenge Hamas to immediately end its support of terrorism,
dissolve its militia, and amend its charter, which calls for
Israel's destruction. If Hamas refuses, the United States must deny
recognition of the new government, halt foreign aid to it, and
denounce it as an illegitimate terrorist regime.
According to
preliminary results, Hamas won 76 seats in the 132-seat Palestine
Legislative Council, eclipsing Fatah, which won only 43. Hamas
could form the next Palestinian government by itself or build a
ruling coalition with Fatah or other minority parties. The
elections were a referendum on Fatah's longstanding domination of
Palestinian politics. Many Palestinians were appalled by the
corruption, cronyism, and ineffectiveness of Fatah, which never
transformed itself from an authoritarian revolutionary movement
into a responsible governing party. Hamas picked up a sizable
anti-Fatah protest vote, in addition to the votes of the estimated
30 to 35 percent of Palestinians who support its radical Islamic
agenda.
Although foreign
policy played little role in the political campaign, it will play a
huge role in determining the future of Palestinians. Hamas not only
rejects peace with Israel, but it rejects Israel's continued
existence. It is dedicated to destroying the Jewish state and
creating a radical Islamic state in its place. Its ideology of
hatred, extensive use of terrorism, and commitment to destroy a
neighboring democracy make Hamas unfit to qualify as a democratic
party, let alone a democratic government.
Building a genuine
democracy requires much more than just elections. It also requires
a supportive civil society, respect for the rule of law, and
protection of minority rights against the tyranny of the majority.
The Bush Administration should be clear that popularity alone does
not confer legitimacy on the winner of an election. In addition to
winning at the ballot box, a political party must pass a violence
test and a values test before it can be considered truly
"democratic." Hamas flunks both.
A truly democratic
party must reject violence, intimidation, and terrorism, not only
against its own people but also against other nations, even if they
are historic enemies. There should be no tolerance for the fiction
of distinguishing between a "political wing" and a "military wing"
of a party. Militias and terrorist organizations must be dismantled
before a party is accepted as a suitable participant in elections.
Opening the door to political movements such as Hamas to compete in
elections without first dropping their reliance on violence will
only allow them to subvert democracy and establish a stranglehold
on political power.
Political parties
must also pass a values test: they must not advocate racial or
religious discrimination. Many European states ban neo-Nazi and
other racist political parties. Parties such as Hamas that demonize
other religions should also be prohibited from participating in
elections and ostracized if they manage to win. The Bush
Administration should have made this clear before the vote.
Now that Hamas has
been elected to power, the Bush Administration should insist that
it dissolve its militia, disavow terrorism, and amend its charter
to drop its goal of destroying Israel. These are necessities if it
expects to be treated as a responsible democratic government. If
Hamas refuses, then Washington should refuse to recognize the new
government, halt all aid to the Palestinians, and press its allies
to follow suit. The United States should not legitimize and empower
a terrorist government that is committed to the destruction of a
democratic ally.
James
Phillips is Research Fellow in Middle Eastern Studies in the
Douglas and Sarah Allison Center for Foreign Policy Studies, a
division of the Kathryn and Shelby Cullom Davis Institute for
International Studies, at The Heritage Foundation.