Many Americans are
getting conflicting messages about the current state of the
economy. They know that their family's financial situation has
improved over the past four years, but when they read the news or
turn on the television they find stories about sub-par job growth
and stagnant wages. Many commentators appear to agree that
America's economic engine has stalled.[1]
These commentators are wrong. Beyond the headlines, the data reveal
that America currently enjoys one of the strongest economies of the
past three decades. Today, unemployment is at 4.7 percent, well
below the historical average, and compensation for workers has
risen faster than during the previous economic recovery.
Unemployment at Historic Lows
The current
recovery has created jobs for virtually every American who wants
one. Only 4.7 percent of Americans are unemployed, well below what
economists historically consider the "natural rate" of
unemployment.[2] With the
exception of the tech bubble economy of the late 1990s,
unemployment has not dipped below 4.7 percent since the first
quarter of 1970. (See Chart 1)

Those skeptical of
America's current economic strength discount the low unemployment
rate and point instead to the 4.8 million new jobs the economy has
created since August of 2003-a relatively sluggish rate for a
recovery.[3]
What the
Facts Say about Employment
Since the first
quarter of 2000, many Americans have left the labor market. As a
result, the fraction of the population in the labor force, also
known as the labor force participation rate, declined. Critics
argue that the unemployment rate masks the underlying weakness of
the job market. The unemployment rate is low, they suggest, because
jobless Americans are not seeking employment due to a lack of
available jobs.
This explanation
may make some sense intuitively, but the facts do not support it.
The government asks people not looking for work if they stopped
searching because they believed no jobs were available. For the
past two years, the number of the "discouraged" workers dropped
even as the unemployment rate fell.[4] Fewer potential
workers report not looking for jobs out of discouragement than at
the same point during the recovery from the 1990-91 recession.[5] The facts simply
do not support the belief that poor job prospects have led workers
to drop out of the labor force, thus artificially lowering the
unemployment rate.
The evidence shows
that labor force participation rates primarily fell because fewer
young Americans want to work. Only teenagers, and to a lesser
extent 20-24-year-olds, show a large drop in labor force
participation rates. Chart 2 shows the decrease since 2000 in
the percentage of Americans seeking employment by age group. The
drop in youth job seekers explains almost eighty percent of the
drop in labor force participation rates since 2000.[6] Contrary to the
image of a weak economy not generating jobs, more Americans over 55
work in jobs today than did six years ago.

In fact,
researchers at the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago found that a
weak economy does not explain the drop in teenage participation
rates. If it did, "we would expect to see that the industries that
have traditionally hired teenagers had fallen on hard times,
disproportionately impacting teenage work activity. However ... the
top five industry employers of teenagers, accounting for almost
half of all 16 year olds to 19 year olds employed in 1999, have
together experienced employment growth well above the national
average."[7] Rather than being
unable to find work the data indicate that increasing numbers of
young Americans have decided to stay in high school or go to
college instead of entering the workforce.[8]
With unemployment
at only 4.7 percent, employers have hired almost everyone looking
for a job. This low rate demonstrates the underlying strength of
the economy, not its weakness. The rate suggests that more
Americans are delaying work and income until they leave school.
This will lead to an even stronger economy in the future because
education holds the key to opportunity in the knowledge economy
Workers
Compensation Rising
In addition to
downplaying low unemployment rates, many commentators argue that
wages have not kept pace with inflation, and as a result American
workers' spending power has fallen. A closer look at the breakdown
of wage and compensation growth since 2000 tells a very different
story.
To be accurate,
workers' total compensation must measure other benefits such as
health and dental care, sick leave, vacation time and holiday
leave, as well as retirement and savings plans. Using wages as the
sole measure of economic prosperity leads to incomplete
conclusions. The facts do not support the popular notion that
stagnating wages and increasing healthcare costs have lead to a
"wage squeeze."
According to the
Bureau of Labor Statistics' Employment Cost Index (ECI), workers
compensation has clearly increased over the past five years. While
real wages have only increased by one and a half percentage points,
total paid benefits have increased rapidly. Employer provided
benefits increased 14 percent between the peak of the last cycle
and today, far more than the nine percent rate of benefit growth at
this point in the recovery from the 1990-1991 recession.[9] Overall, workers
total compensation has risen five percent this cycle, compared to
less than four percent during the last cycle.
Chart 3
clearly shows the added benefits being offered to employees by
their employers. Workers now receive more paid vacation days,
better healthcare plans, extra sick days and other forms of
compensation that enhance their well-being.

Non-Health
Care Benefits Also Rising Substantially
These increased
benefits do not simply represent rising healthcare costs instead of
additional benefits to employees. As a measure of labor costs, the
ECI does not break down employer benefits into separate components.
However, the Employer Costs for Employee
Compensation data (ECEC) provide a more detailed breakdown of
overall compensation and also controls for pay differences in newly
created jobs. Unlike the ECI, the ECEC will report lower
average compensation if the recovery primarily created jobs in low
paying sectors of the economy.
A review of total benefits allocated to
compensation shows that, even excluding health care, total employee
benefits have risen substantially.
The ECEC shows
worker compensation rose even faster than the ECI did, indicating
that the recovery created significant numbers of jobs in
high-paying sectors of the economy. Total benefits paid to private
sector workers have increased 14 percent since 2001.[10] Benefits
excluding healthcare grew by more than 10 percent during this
time.[11] Total
compensation excluding health benefits increased by almost five
percent-much stronger growth rates than during the recovery from
the 1991 recession. This recovery has left workers far better off
than the last cycle did (Chart 4).

The argument that
wages are being devoured by rising healthcare costs bears little
truth after taking a closer look at the numbers.
Conclusion
Now at the
beginning of a fifth year of economic expansion, Americans have
every reason to be optimistic about the future of the economy.
Unemployment stands at only 4.7 percent while total compensation
has risen at a faster rate than it did after the 1991 recession,
even after accounting for higher health care costs. While labor
force participation rates have declined, this is not the calamity
that some pundits suggest. Instead, young Americans are now more
and more willing to forgo immediate earnings and invest in their
futures by remaining in school longer. Those cynics who argue that
the current recovery is not benefiting the average citizen are off
the mark. Congress should make permanent the pro-growth tax
provisions of the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts to keep Americans
working.
Rea
Hederman is Senior Policy Analyst, James Sherk is Policy
Analyst, and Samuel Hyman is Research Assistant, in the Center for
Data Analysis at The Heritage Foundation.
[1]
See Lee Price, "Why are People so Dissatisfied with Today's
Economy," Jan. 27th, 2006. Economic Policy Institute Issue Brief
#219 at .
[2]
Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor
Statistics, "The Employment Situation," Table A-1, May 5, 2006 at
(May 5,
2006).
[3]
Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Establishment
Survey, Table B-1, May 5, 2006 at
(May 5, 2006).
[4]
The Bureau of Labor Statistics defines discouraged workers as
individuals who are not looking for jobs because they believe no
work is available for them, because they tried but could not find
work, because they lack schooling, or because they face
discrimination.
[5]
Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, "The Employment
Situation." Table A-13, May 5, 2006 at
(May 5, 2006).
[6]
Author's analysis of data from the Department of Labor, Bureau of
Labor Statistics, "Employment and Earnings," Tables A-13 and A-22,
May 5, 2006 at
and (May 5,
2006). Calculations are available upon request.
[7]
Daniel Aaronson, Kyung-Hong Park and Daniel G. Sullivan, "The
Decline in Teen Labor Force Participation" Economic
Perspectives, 2006
[9]
Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, "Employment Cost
Index," Table 1, May 5, 2006 at
(May 5, 2006). All series deflated using the Bureau of
Labor Statistics Consumer Price Index Research Series. Dates
compared are Q2-1990 to Q2-1995, and Q1-2001 to Q1-2006.
[10]
Author's analysis of data from the Department of Labor, Bureau of
Labor Statistics, "Employer Costs for Employee Compensation," March
16, 2006 at
(May 5, 2006).