Over ten million
undocumented immigrants reside in the United States, living and
working outside the law. Hiding from the authorities, they operate
in the shadows of the economy. The Senate recently passed
legislation that would provide millions of illegal immigrants with
legal guest-worker status in order to bring them into the
mainstream of American life and make them accountable to the law.
The Senate bill, however, requires that any business hiring guest
workers pay them "prevailing wages" set well above market rates.
Because very few employers would pay such inflated wages, the
Senate bill would leave many illegal immigrants in the underground
economy.
Davis-Bacon Defeats
the Senate's Goal
"We have a
national interest in identifying these individuals [illegal
immigrants], incentivizing them to come forward out of the shadows,
go through security background checks, pay back taxes, pay
penalties for breaking the law, learn to speak English, and
regularize their status," said Senator John McCain (R-AZ).These
goals motivated the Senate to pass the Comprehensive Immigration
Reform Act (CIRA). The billwould allow hundreds of thousands of
illegal immigrants to apply for guest-worker visas that permit work
and residence in the United States for up to six years. Senators
hope that this law will bring illegal immigrants inside the
protections and strictures of the rule of law.
But the Senate
bill will bring few immigrants out of the shadows for a simple
reason: Its prevailing wage provisions would encourage guest
workers to remain off the books.
The Senate bill
requires that employers pay all guest workers the "prevailing wage"
for their fields as determined under the Davis-Bacon Act. These
prevailing wage rates are usually equivalent to union wages and are
typically well above market rates. In California, for example,
prevailing wages are 35 percent to 55 percent above market rates.
Carpenters in Los Angeles earn $21.56 an hour in the market but
$31.71 an hour under Davis-Bacon. That difference could price guest
workers out of the market.

On top of this
added wage burden, the compliance requirements of Davis-Bacon are
onerous and extremely expensive. The Government Accountability
Office (GAO) found that Davis-Bacon paperwork alone increases
federal contractors' costs by over a billion dollars per year.
The Heritage Foundation has highlighted the economic problems
associated with extending Davis-Bacon rates to immigrants, but the
consequences of this provision extend beyond economic disruption.
Businesses and
contractors are unlikely to pay highly inflated wages and fill out
reams of paperwork just for the privilege of hiring immigrant guest
workers. They are more likely to decline to hire any guest
workers-legally, at least. But many of the firms that employ the
millions of undocumented immigrants in the U.S. today would
probably be willing to hire those workers at market wages,
illegally. Similarly, guest workers who cannot find legal work at
inflated Davis-Bacon wages are unlikely to stop working. Instead,
most of them will take jobs that illegally pay market wages.
Thus many
immigrants could remain in the shadows of underground labor
markets. If the only jobs most guest workers can find are those
that illegally pay normal wages, then guest workers will take
illegal jobs, or they will choose not to apply for legal
guest-worker status in the first place. Working illegally, they
will be unable to enter mainstream American society, and they will
have no legal recourse against employers who exploit them or deny
their rights. They will continue to hide from legal authorities,
aware that they are violating the law.
Conclusion
The U.S. Senate
wants to bring currently illegal immigrants out from the
underground economy and into the mainstream of American society. It
wants them to go through background checks, pay their taxes, and be
able to stand up for their rights. But forcing any business hiring
a guest worker to pay vastly inflated wages guarantees that
immigrants will remain in the shadows.
James Sherk is a Policy Analyst in the Center for Data
Analysis at The Heritage Foundation.
Matthew
Newman and Sean Blosser, "An Analysis of Market and Prevailing Wage
Rates for the Construction Trades in California," The California
Institute for County Government, August 2003. Available online at
(July 20th, 2006)