The Bureau of Labor Statistics's November employment report
makes for some Christmas cheer. The report's good news is that the
unemployment rate increased only slightly, to 4.5 percent, despite
that nearly 400,000 people entered the job market. The number of
payroll jobs increased by 132,000, slightly below the average
monthly average of 149,000 for 2006. While these preliminary
numbers are certain to change, they should diminish fears of a soft
economy.
Employment Report
While the unemployment rate increased a statistically
insignificant 0.1 percent from the five-year low of 4.4 percent
observed in October, it remains extremely low by historical
standards and is well below the 5.0 percent unemployment rate of a
year ago. The unemployment rate has declined even as the civilian
labor force participation rate has increased over the past year. In
other words, the number of new jobs is growing faster than the
number of people entering the job market.
Teenagers continue to delay entering the job market despite the
sharp decline in the teen unemployment rate. The overall labor
force participation rate has declined since 2000, and workers aged
16 to 19 accounted for six-sevenths of the decline.[1] Many teenagers are delaying
their entrance into the job market to enhance their skills through
more education.[2] This will lead to greater future
productivity for both these teenagers and the economy.
The job picture remains bright even as the construction industry
softens along with the housing market. For the third month in a
row, construction has shed jobs. But overall, employment in
construction fell by just 2,000 jobs over the course of the year,
alleviating concerns of a hard landing due to the housing market
slump.
Rising Wages
The employment report also challenges another myth about the
economy. Liberal commentators complain that despite signs of
outward strength, the economy is shortchanging workers.
Specifically, they argue that workers' pay has not kept pace with
increases in workers' productivity, as it has historically.[3] The economy is
growing and businesses' profits are rising, liberals argue, but
only the wealthiest Americans are seeing their incomes grow.
But recent differences between earnings and productivity are not
unusual, and they are not evidence that workers were getting
shortchanged. Wages and productivity move together over the long
term but often do not move together at every point of the business
cycle. For example, productivity grew faster than compensation for
several years following the 1991 recession. At one point in that
recovery, productivity had risen 9.7 percent while compensation had
only risen 6.1 percent.[4]
By the end of the 1990s, however, low unemployment meant that
nearly all workers were seeing fatter paychecks, as labor-starved
companies competed for workers. In addition, workers' earnings shot
up rapidly during the late 1990s, catching up to the earlier
productivity gains.[5] In the end, gains in wages matched gains in
productivity, but with a lag of several years.
The U.S. economy may be at that point now. Employees are
enjoying substantial raises. Even as productivity growth has
slowed, workers' wages have risen rapidly. Over the past 12 months,
average hourly wages have increased by 4.1 percent. Earnings have
not risen this quickly since February 2001, right before the
collapse of the tech bubble.[6] The same also holds true after taking
account of inflation. Inflation-adjusted wages have risen 2.8
percent over the past year, the fastest rate since August 1998.[7]
Companies are giving their employees the raises that their
increased productivity has earned them, and in response, incomes
are rising. Arguments that companies are not passing on
productivity gains to their workers appear set to join the
complaints of two years ago-about the "jobless recovery"-in the
trash bin.
Conclusion
The current economic expansion sparked by President Bush's
reduction in the tax rates on labor and capital continues to
support a solid labor market. Even with a slight economic slowdown
in the third quarter of this year, the economy boasts a very low
unemployment rate.
The new Congress should not interfere with this economic
expansion. Tax increases, new government regulations, and labor
market interference will hurt the economy in the long run and cost
jobs. If Congress does anything at all, it should make President
Bush's tax cuts permanent and thereby continue to support an
economy that remains the envy of the world.
Rea S.
Hederman, Jr., is Senior Policy Analyst, and James
Sherk is Policy Analyst, in the Center for Data Analysis at The
Heritage Foundation.
[3] See Jonathan
Chait, "Freakoutonomics," The New Republic Online, Oct. 26, 2006,
at .
[4]Heritage
Foundation calculations based on Bureau of Labor Statistics,
"Productivity and Costs: Nonfarm business sector." Compensation
deflated using the implicit price deflator. These figures are
measured 20 quarters out from the end of the 1991 recession, from
Q1 1991 to Q1 1996.
[6]Heritage
Foundation calculations based on Bureau of Labor Statistics,
"Employment Situation News Release," Table B-3, December 8, 2006,
at .
[7] Ibid.
Note that the past 12 months encompasses October 2005 to October
2006, as inflation data is not yet available for November 2006.