The U.S. Congress recently voted to increase the federal minimum
wage from $5.15 to $7.25 over a two-year period-a dramatic 40
percent increase. Final action on the minimum wage increase has not
yet been cleared due to differences in the Senate bill and the
House bill. Congress should be reminded that a minimum wage is
nothing more than a price control on labor, which is a restriction
on economic freedom. Any nation that raises its minimum wage
compromises its economic freedom score, as reflected in the
Index of Economic Freedom. The proposed change could reduce
America's labor freedom score in the Index from 92 percent
to 87 percent. America, now the fourth freest economy in the world,
would drop to sixth place due to this single policy change.
Minimum Wage in the Labor Market
In a free market economy, prices allocate land, information,
capital goods, and labor to their highest use. Markets are truly
free only if prices are free. For example, a firm that needs more
workers signals its need to the labor market by offering a higher
wage. Wages are good indicators that direct people to employment
and show businesses how to expand. Freely floating prices allocate
resources efficiently to places where they will take root and boost
economic productivity.
Many types of labor regulations infringe on this market
mechanism by disturbing price signals and, therefore, restraining
the economic freedom of business owners and workers. One of the
most prominent is the minimum wage. By setting a
government-specified floor for workers' wages, minimum wage laws
tend to disrupt labor supply and demand.
The labor market is not excused from the basic economic
principle that artificially high prices cause lower demand. In
particular, less skilled workers will suffer. The mismatch between
labor supply and labor demand is likely to harm the very people the
minimum wage is intended to help. A recent National Bureau of
Economic Research study reviewed about 90 empirical papers from the
early 1990s to the present. It found that two-thirds of those
papers conclude that the effects of the minimum wage are negative.
Further, among the most methodologically rigorous of those
papers,"almost all point to negative employment effects." More
specifically, the study also revealed that there is "relatively
overwhelming evidence of stronger disemployment" impacts on less
experienced workers.[1]
Labor Freedom and Minimum Wage
Of even greater concern, increasing minimum wage is likely to
curtail one of the pillars of U.S. international competitiveness,
labor freedom. Labor freedom, like property rights and business
freedom, is fundamental to a country's overall economic freedom as
measured by the Index of Economic Freedom, an annual study
by The Heritage Foundation and The Wall Street
Journal. The Index grades 157 countries' economic
freedom, and one of the Index's ten key components is a
labor freedom factor that measures the ability of workers and
businesses to interact without restrictions imposed by the
government.[2]
According to the 2007 Index, U.S. labor markets
are 92.1 percent free. Raising the minimum wage, which is one of
the four elements of the labor freedom factor, will lower the score
for U.S. labor freedom. The amount of the drop depends on how the
50 states react, because many have higher local minimum wages and
would presumably raise theirs in response to congressional action.
The proposed increase in the federal minimum wage is estimated to
reduce the overall U.S. labor freedom score by 1.2 to 4.8
percentage points, dropping the labor score potentially as low as
87.3 percent.[3]
America's economy is currently rated as 82 percent free overall.
The implications of the 40 percent increase in the minimum wage
could drop that score to 81.5 percent free.
Conclusion
Supporters of increasing the minimum wage argue that they do so
in order to help poor and less skilled workers. But government
intrusion into the labor market through raising minimum wage
generates the same problems that similar interventions produce in
other markets. The minimum wage disrupts the natural interaction of
supply and demand and leads to inefficient allocations of labor
and, eventually, increased unemployment. Congress should reconsider
increasing the minimum wage and look for ways to help American
workers by increasing their competitiveness.
Tim Kane,
Ph.D., is Director of, and Anthony
B. Kim is Policy Analyst in, the Center for International Trade
and Economics at The Heritage Foundation.
[1] David
Neumark and William Wascher, "Minimum Wages and Employment: A
Review of Evidence from the New Minimum Wage Research," NBER
Working Paper No. 12663, November 2006, at (March 6, 2007).
[2] The
following four quantitative components each account for 25 percent
of the labor freedom factor: minimum wage, rigidity of hours,
difficulty of firing redundant employees, and cost of firing
redundant workers. For more information on the labor factor, see
Tim Kane, Ph.D., Kim R. Holmes, Ph.D., and Mary Anastasia O'Grady,
2007 Index of Economic Freedom (Washington, D.C.: Heritage
Books and Dow Jones & Company, Inc.), chapter 3, at
www.heritage.org/research/features/index/chapters/htm/index2007_chap3.cfm.
[3] This assumes
that all variables in the labor freedom factor other than the
minimum wage rate remain constant.