On Wall Street, there is a widening gulf between bulls and
bears, and today's GDP report has surprises for both sides. On its
face, the overall real growth rate of 3.4 percent in the second
quarter of 2007 was higher than expected and higher than the
average of 3.2 percent over recent decades. Yet the report cannot
dispel the genuine threats to the economy, notably the continuing
weakness in the housing and specifically subprime mortgage sector;
oil prices nearing $80 a barrel; and the likelihood of Congress
passing protectionist legislation later this year. Congress must
reject such action for strong economic growth to continue for the
rest of the year.
Behind the Numbers
The number one concern of market watchers is that the American
consumer is losing steam. The cliché is that consumption
makes up two-thirds of GDP, and so any sluggishness in consumer
buying power (higher interest rates, lower home prices, and,
therefore, weaker equity credit lines) will curtail spending. That
was the dominant story when GDP growth all but flatlined in the
first quarter of 2007. The consumption cliché played out
again this morning, which is to be expected with the annualized
growth rate dropping from a 3.7 percent annualized growth rate last
quarter to just 1.3 percent. Yet the other shoe did not drop,
because overall GDP surged at its fastest rate in a year.
More surprisingly, the trade balance has turned around; net
exports actually added to GDP growth rather than taking away from
it (which is all international trade does, according to many in
Congress). According to the Commerce Department's press
release:
Real exports of goods and services increased 6.4 percent in the
second quarter, compared with an increase of 1.1 percent in the
first. Real imports of goods and services decreased 2.6
percent, in contrast to an increase of 3.9 percent. (italics
added)
When examining the reasons for GDP growth, the report shows that
roughly one-fourth of the second quarter's growth is due to
consumption (0.9 of the 3.4 percent). A similar percentage is
attributed to rising government expenditures, while half a
percentage point comes from gross private investment. The surge in
net exports is the largest slice, accounting for 1.2 of the 3.4
percent GDP growth.
Today's report marks the first time since 1991 (65 quarterly
reports ago) when the contribution from net exports exceeded
consumption. This fact is especially significant when one observes
that net exports, like profits, frequently go into negative
territory, unlike consumption which is almost always growing to
some degree. Some will argue that the declining dollar is helping
to restore the trade balance, but investment flows are a much
larger influence on exchange rates. Furthermore, it is investment
policy where the U.S. may face the most significant downside
risk.
Conclusion: Protectionist Agenda Threatens
Economy
Congress has all but shut down the trade agenda in recent months
and is prepared to pass a dramatic new law to "fix" currency
misalignment-a euphemistic approach to raising tariffs on trade
with China. Likewise, congressional efforts to "fix" inequality
have focused on raising taxes, notably on capital formation. The
rhetoric of fighting inequality plays well politically, but if
anti-capital legislation moves ahead, the main casualties will be
American jobs and wages. Investors will not wait for the bills to
become law and will preemptively start pulling out of U.S. equities
and bonds as soon as the bills move through committee.
The debate between bulls and bears will continue for at least
one more quarter. It will likely be Congress that decides the
winner three months from now.
Tim Kane,
Ph.D., is Director of the Center for
International Trade and Economics at The Heritage
Foundation.