U.S. interests in Asia begin with a stable, secure geopolitical
and economic order that is friendly to free commerce. Central to
this is an Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) that can
confidently hold its own, particularly in the face of China's
incredible economic growth and rise as a global power. ASEAN needs
an integrated, liberal economy of scale to meet the challenge. The
U.S. has a major interest in helping ASEAN to reach this goal.
ASEAN at 40 Years. At 40 years of age, ASEAN-- which
encompasses the five original member countries of Indonesia,
Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, and Thailand and the
newer member countries of Brunei, Cambodia, Laos, Burma, and
Vietnam--is the oldest and largest organization of its kind in
Asia. ASEAN countries have a combined population of more than 500
million people-- larger than the population of the European Union.
Their combined gross domestic product (GDP) exceeds $1 trillion and
is the 11th largest in the world, ahead of Russia and India.
ASEAN has committed itself to making the most of its collective
economic strength by achieving an integrated, liberal market. Ten
years ago in Kuala Lumpur, ASEAN launched ASEAN Vision 2020, which
calls for creating "a stable, prosperous and highly competitive
ASEAN Economic Region in which there is a free flow of goods,
services and investments, a freer flow of capital, equitable
economic development and reduced poverty and socio-economic
disparities." This is ASEAN's guiding economic vision. It is
echoed repeatedly in ASEAN documents, including the new ASEAN
Charter.
Despite its pledges, however, economic integration is today
more aspiration than reality. ASEAN is not a single integrated
market. It is 10 separate markets that are no more
economically integrated with each another than they are with
economies outside of ASEAN. Intra-ASEAN trade accounts for only
about 25 percent of its global trade. Intra-ASEAN foreign direct
investment (FDI) amounts to 11 percent of total FDI into
ASEAN.
However, the measure of ASEAN's economic integration is not only
intraregional trade and investment flows, but also its
attractiveness as an investment destination. Yet even as it has
sought ever new ways to stay competitive as a region, ASEAN has
lagged behind China--particularly since the 1997 Asian financial
crisis. (A few years prior to the crisis, ASEAN actually led China
as an investment destination.)
It has been famously said that what East Asian economic
integration needs is management, not vision. While ASEAN's dizzying
array of agreements, initiatives, and commitments clearly lacks
adequate management, ASEAN's vision is also unresolved. The member
countries' less-than-resolute commitment to free markets
contributes directly to the management problem. It forces
ASEAN to pursue a lowest-common-denominator path to integration
that leaves it short of its ambitious economic goals. True
commitment to economic freedom would ease integration by
eliminating obstacles and feeding the market forces that are
responsible for whatever real cross-border economic activity is
taking place.
The ASEAN countries need to decide that ASEAN Vision 2020 is
where they want to go, make the difficult choices at the national
level that are required to achieve that vision, and exercise the
necessary political will to follow through. With the right level of
commitment, managing ASEAN economic integration will become
easier, and an integrated, liberal Southeast Asian market will
become a reality.
What the U.S. Should Do to Help. The United States
should:
- Stabilize the American diplomatic commitment to
ASEAN,
- Intensify U.S. Trade Representative involvement in
the ASEAN economic ministers and associated forums,
- Expand the U.S.-ASEAN Trade and Investment Framework
Arrangement (TIFA) work program to address non-tariff barriers,
barriers in cross-border services trade, and investment
issues,
- Stay focused on an eventual U.S.-ASEAN free trade
agreement (FTA),
- Continue to look for bilateral FTA opportunities,
and
- Fully fund the ASEAN Development Vision to Advance
National Cooperation and Economic Integration (ADVANCE).
Conclusion. ASEAN's ambition is clear, its record in
implementing agreements to facilitate economic integration is
spotty, and its commitment to economic freedom is subpar. ASEAN
requires a resolution of vision to get to ASEAN Economic
Community. It also needs the tools and resources to manage the
undertaking effectively.
The U.S. cannot give ASEAN the political will that it needs, but
by demonstrating serious, sustained interest in ASEAN's economic
life, the U.S. can ensure that its advice and concerns are taken
into account. The U.S. can also engage at the technical level in a
way that enables the group to meet its objectives.
Walter Lohman is Director
of the Asian Studies Center and Anthony B. Kim is a Policy
Analyst in the Center for International Trade and Economics at The
Heritage Foundation.