In his meeting with President Obama on June 15, Italian Prime
Minister Silvio Berlusconi, who will host the G-8 Summit July 8-10
in L'Aquila, Italy, suggested the need to develop "a body of rules
and principles" to keep the current economic crisis from repeating
in the future.[1] Berlusconi remarked, "We agree that the G-8
itself will not be able to create that body, but, as the Pittsburgh
G-20 approaches, we must work to arrive at joint solutions that
will not curb the free expansion of the economy."[2]
The current period of global financial and economic turmoil is a
great opportunity to ponder the principles that can revitalize
economic growth. Indeed, the urgency to set forth and adhere to
sensible principles has increased as a wave of interventionism has
seen governments take more control of private companies and even
entire industries, wearing away economic freedoms hard won through
years of reform.
Policy choices made at this critical juncture of the economic
crisis will unquestionably shape the growth trajectory for the
world economy in coming years. If Berlusconi and other leaders of
the G-8 are serious about developing a set of principles that
address the international economic situation in a constructive way,
they should begin with a renewed commitment to enhancing economic
freedom. After all, the best and most principled approach to move
beyond the current crisis is to generate more economic growth and
opportunity as quickly as possible.
Exemplifying such commitment, German Chancellor Angela Merkel,
who has fended off calls from the Obama Administration pressuring
her government to spend more money to deal with the current crisis,
defended her plan to cut taxes in her June 29 speech. Merkel
rightly noted that "it would be wrong not to do what is right and
necessary for growth, and so prevent ourselves emerging quickly
from this crisis."[3]
Advancing economic freedom is the way not only to fix the
institutional infrastructure essential for more vibrant growth but
also to swiftly transform today's financial downturn into greater
prosperity for the future.
Time to Stop Expanding Government's
Heavy Hand
By empowering people with unprecedented opportunity, economic
freedom has in recent decades generated tremendous success stories
around the world. Unfortunately, this success is now at risk. In
light of the current financial storm, many have stepped up their
direct and indirect campaigns against the free market system.
Whether through ideological zeal or simple ignorance and fear, some
seem ready--even eager--to abandon the economic freedoms on which
world prosperity has been built. Though decades of evidence
highlight the negative results of increasing regulatory burdens,
massive government spending, and nationalization of industry, in a
time of crisis some, incredibly, seem to yearn for the heavy hand
of government.
That heavy hand, more than any market factor, is the greatest
risk to economic dynamism. Governments' rush to fix the perceived
causes of the current crisis is increasingly demonstrating the
danger that government interventions, rather than fixing economic
problems, can actually exacerbate them. Proponents of various
bailout programs for troubled companies and industries have argued
that those programs are indispensable short-term steps to prop up
stock markets and help economies make a swift recovery. Yet the
long-run effect of such programs will be counterproductive. Those
government interventionist measures essentially rescue and reward
those who took irresponsible risks, severely undermining the
discipline of the market and eroding economic freedom.
Furthermore, those measures impose an unfair burden on people
and businesses that behaved responsibly. They undoubtedly encourage
similarly reckless choices in the future. Worse, the bailouts will
give the government more political power over the efficient
allocation of capital, a detrimental course of action that will
surely further undermine overall economic efficiency.
The World Needs More Economic Freedom,
Not Less
Given the efficiency of the free economy in allocating resources
to their most productive use, the most reliable economic recovery
can be best achieved by unleashing rather than further constraining
market forces. Governments' most effective stimulus package will
therefore be about improving the incentives that drive
entrepreneurial activity, not undermining it with more layers of
regulation.
Although past performance may be no guarantee of future
outcomes, it remains the best available guide. Over the past
decades, the free market system that is rooted in economic freedom
has fueled unprecedented economic growth around the world. From
1980 to 2007, the world economy achieved real GDP expansion by
around 145 percent,[4] lifting hundreds of millions of people out
of poverty.[5]
A key driver of such economic growth and prosperity has been the
high levels of flexibility and resilience that come with economic
freedom. In continuously cultivating such freedom, many governments
have ensured the free flow of goods and services, improved the ease
of conducting business, controlled inflation, and cut taxes while
emphasizing greater transparency and accountability under the
strong rule of law. The powerful forces of economic freedom have
fostered the spirit of entrepreneurship and innovation that creates
new products and more jobs, spreading the benefits of a dynamic
economy around the globe.
Despite some setbacks, the system still remains not only
viable--with its core features such as private property rights,
openness, and flexibility almost uncontested--but uniquely able to
promote prosperity. As the financial and economic crisis has been
unfolding into an unemployment crisis, it is imperative to pick up
the pace of economic reforms to facilitate business startups and
overall economic growth, which supply jobs and income for more
people.
Enhancing Economic Freedom: A Key
Pillar of Exit Strategies
Although it is not easy to accept the cyclical nature of
economies, there can be found some parallels between the 1997 Asian
financial crisis and today's difficulties.[6] The Asian crisis triggered
extensive economic and political unrest in emerging Asian markets,
sending many into recession. At the time, one commonly employed
shortsighted interpretation was that the crisis debunked the "Asian
Miracle." Capitalism and globalization were repudiated and blamed
for the bursting of currency and property bubbles and the resultant
difficulties.
The years since the 1997 crisis, however, have shown that this
interpretation was exaggerated. Asia has become once again the most
dynamic region in the global economy. As painful as the crisis was,
the aftermath of the market turmoil helped crisis-hit Asian
economies such as South Korea, Thailand, and Malaysia embrace more
economic freedom as part of exit strategies out of the crisis. That
is, the crisis offered an opportunity to embrace more market
principles. To their credit, most crisis-affected Asian governments
took steps to address their problems by reforming financial
sectors, improving transparency of regulations, strengthening
corporate governance, and opening their markets to more
competition. In addition, they have continued to promote their
economic advantages by embracing foreign trade and seizing
opportunities to integrate themselves into the global trading
system. In hindsight, the 1997 Asian financial crisis was nothing
more than a transitory setback that spurred more openness and
transparency for the Asian economy.
Today's world economy could also emerge stronger if the right
policy choices are decisively made at this critical juncture of the
financial crisis. Abruptly halting the long-standing commitment to
economic freedom will only prolong the current economic downturn
and weaken the foundation for solid economic growth.
Preserving Economic Freedom
The challenge is to preserve the progress in economic freedom
that has been made and to revamp the reform agenda to focus on
generating greater economic freedom, not less. Meeting this
challenge will require strong commitment and political leadership.
This is where the G-8 should come in.
Leaders of the G-8 should be reminded that economic freedom is
an indispensable link between economic opportunity and prosperity.
The principles of economic freedom and rules for a free market that
enhance rather than suppress competition are proven to work only if
governments will respect them. Nothing the G-8 could do would be
more powerful in promoting an economic turnaround than a
reaffirmation of these principles, with a pledge by each leader to
rededicate themselves to openness, liberalization, and freedom.
With such a commitment, the global economy would emerge quickly
with better-equipped institutions and a more vigorous and vibrant
economy that can more effectively deal with not only today's
challenges but also those of the future.
Anthony B. Kim is Policy Analyst in the Center
for International Trade and Economics at The Heritage
Foundation.