Amid festering concerns about China's burgeoning
global power, Beijing has set its sights on expanding its influence
in Africa. In a throwback to the Maoist revolutionary days of the
1960s and '70s, Beijing has once again identified the 53-nation
African continent as an area of strategic interest. But this time
it's not interested in exporting communism. Instead, it's wholly
concerned with international trade.
Seeking new markets for its export-driven economy and unimpeded
access to Africa's abundant natural resources, China lavishes
African leaders with diplomatic pomp and circumstance as well as
financial, commercial, and military assistance. Unfortunately, the
policies of the People's Republic of China are aiding and abetting
oppression, human rights abuses, poor governance, and economic
stagnation, while shoring up some of Africa's most odious
regimes.
Across the planet, China is aggressively seeking new friends and
allies, and proving to be a less-demanding alternative to the more
scrupulous United States and European nations. Africa's traditional
European colonial and American partners now find their vision of a
continent governed by free-market democracies and the rule of law
challenged by Beijing's scramble for influence and resources.
Nothing is driving China into Africa more than its insatiable
appetite for oil and gas. For the past decade, the Chinese economy
has expanded annually at near double-digit rates, requiring an
enormous influx of resources. China is already the world's second
largest energy consumer, leading Beijing to Africa's door in an
effort to reduce its reliance on volatile Middle Eastern sources.
Today, Africa provides China with 30 percent of its energy
imports.
Beijing is building ties with African energy suppliers through
investment, aid, high-level visits, and a strict policy of
"noninterference in internal affairs" that Africa's strongmen find
comforting. China has invested billions in resource development and
infrastructure--and written off billions more in debt--to help
build cozy relationships with dozens of African countries. For
instance, facing rebel attacks against their country's oil
infrastructure and foreign oil workers, and disappointed in the
U.S. response, Nigeria (the world's eighth largest oil exporter)
turned to China for military aid. This generous assistance will not
only protect Beijing's $3 billion oil investment in Nigeria, but
will likely lead to additional lucrative oil concessions from
Abuja. In Angola, another African energy giant, a $2 billion credit
line for much-needed infrastructure projects secured Chinese access
to coveted offshore oil fields, making China Luanda's
second-largest oil customer after the United States.
Sudan presents the most pernicious example of China's new Africa
policy, where Beijing combines its drive for exclusive access to
natural resources with an aggressive political campaign to
ingratiate itself with the continent's despots. While the United
States, the European Union, Japan, and others sought to impose U.N.
sanctions on the Sudanese regime over Khartoum's support for the
genocide in Darfur, China strenuously opposed Security Council
actions. Why? To prevent international economic sanctions from
interfering with China's $3 billion investment in Sudan's oil and
gas industry.
In fact, while 4,000 Chinese People's Liberation Army troops
guarded oil pipelines, Sudanese government forces and
government-aligned militias attacked rebels and hundreds of towns
and villages around oil installations, forcing the dislocation of
hundreds of thousands. Tragically, Khartoum has doubled its defense
budget in recent years, spending 60 percent to 80 percent of its
estimated $500 million in annual oil revenue--half of it from
China--on weapons. Moreover, with Chinese assistance, the Sudanese
government recently built three weapons factories, complicating
international arms embargoes against Khartoum.
The comment of Chinese ambassador to the United States Zhou
Wenzhong, while he was deputy foreign minister, reflects Beijing's
Africa policy: "Business is business. We try to separate politics
from business. Secondly, I think the internal situation in the
Sudan is an internal affair, and we are not in a position to impose
upon them."
Other African countries are regular purchasers of Chinese weapons
and military equipment, too, providing political and economic
access for China while allowing African authoritarians to quash
political opposition and stifle democracy. In Zimbabwe, for
example, President Robert Mugabe's repeated political and human
rights abuses led the United States and the E.U. to impose punitive
sanctions against the regime. Beijing's response was to sell
Zimbabwe over $200 million worth of fighter aircraft and military
vehicles. Beijing also provided equipment for jamming
antigovernment media broadcasts and gave electronic surveillance
equipment to Harare's security services to monitor political
opponents.
Zimbabwe, the world's second largest exporter of platinum, also
gets China's support internationally. Last summer, Britain and the
United States backed yet another U.N. Security Council resolution
condemning Mugabe's policies. Meanwhile, Mugabe flew to Beijing,
seeking a handout for his beggared economy and Chinese support at
the U.N.--which Beijing gave, killing the resolution. Not
surprisingly, Beijing publicly praises Mugabe, who impoverished the
once-prosperous Zimbabwe, as "a man of great achievements, devoted
to world peace and a good friend of the Chinese people."
China's ideological support for African despots like Mugabe lends
these leaders a kind of pseudo-legitimacy both at home and abroad,
blunting pressure for human rights, economic openness, and
political freedom. In return, China receives support at the U.N.
and in other forums for its causes, such as isolating Taiwan. As
China's power grows, Beijing will become more willing to challenge
the United States, the E.U. nations, and others to protect its
interests in Africa--and elsewhere.
While China-Africa trade soared to $30 billion last year, bringing
critical revenue to some of the world's poorest nations, Beijing
also actively promotes its development model, based on a limited
market economy controlled by a totalitarian government. Many
authoritarian African regimes, desperate to invigorate their
lackluster economies while maintaining a strong grip on political
power, find China's modernization model preferable to the difficult
free-market and democratic reforms advocated by the United States
and the European Union.
While some Africans see the Chinese as kindred spirits who
understand Africa's development plight and welcome the Chinese
infrastructure projects, the PRC presence is also a source of
consternation. Chinese firms underbid local companies, and PRC
contractors often use cheap, imported Chinese labor, adding little
to local employment or skill development. Moreover, cheap Chinese
goods flood African markets, especially textiles, shuttering
factories across the continent. And concessionary PRC loans have
put International Monetary Fund and other bank projects on hold
because of concerns about economic mismanagement and
corruption.
China is rapidly expanding its influence in Africa to secure
natural resources, expand Beijing's influence, and even isolate
Taiwan through generous but self-serving diplomatic, financial, and
military assistance. Chinese policies are endangering U.S. goals by
supporting African dictatorships, hindering economic development,
and exacerbating conflicts and human rights abuses in troubled
countries such as Sudan and Zimbabwe.
What is needed is a comprehensive U.S. strategy that encourages
democratic principles, human rights, free markets, and cooperation
in regional security and energy development in concert with
like-minded partners, looking beyond traditional European friends
to democratic Asian and Latin American nations for support.
Otherwise, China's broad energy, trade, political, diplomatic, and,
yes, military interests threaten to undermine long-standing efforts
to promote peace, prosperity, and democracy in Africa.
Peter
Brookes, Heritage Foundation senior fellow, is
the author of "A Devil's Triangle: Terrorism, WMD and Rogue
States."
First appeared in The Weekly Standard