Last month a classified United Nations
report prompted Secretary General Kofi Annan to admit that U.N.
peacekeepers and staff have sexually abused or exploited war
refugees in the Democratic Republic of Congo. The worst of the 150
or so allegations of misconduct--some of them captured on
videotape--include pedophilia, rape, and prostitution. While a U.N.
investigation into the scandal continues, the organization has just
suspended two more peacekeepers in neighboring Burundi over similar
charges. The revelations come three years after another U.N. report
found "widespread" evidence of sexual abuse of West African
refugees.
"The issue with the U.N. is that peacekeeping operations
unfortunately seem to be doing the same thing that other militaries
do," Gita Sahgal of Amnesty International told the Christian
Science Monitor. "Even the guardians have to be guarded." That's
not far off the mark. Various U.N. reports and interviews with
humanitarian groups suggest that international peacekeeping
missions are creating a predatory sexual culture among vulnerable
refugees--from relief workers who demand sexual favors in exchange
for food to U.N. troops who rape women at gunpoint.
Allegations of sexual abuse or misconduct by U.N. staff stretch
back at least a decade, to operations in Kosovo, Sierra Leone,
Liberia, and Guinea. A 2001 report, released by the U.N. High
Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) and Save the Children, found that
sexual violence against refugees in West Africa was endemic (though
some of its findings were denied by a subsequent U.N. team). A year
later a coalition of religious organizations sent a letter to
Secretary of State Colin Powell urging the United States to send
more human rights monitors into Congo. The U.N. then introduced a
"code of conduct" to help prevent future abuses, including
prohibitions against sexual activity between staff and children and
the exchange of money or food for sex.
It now appears, however, that little has changed on the ground. The
U.N. Mission in Congo (MONUC) employs about 10,800 peacekeepers
from 50 countries, in addition to many civilian staff. Yet there is
no independent oversight of U.N. operations in its refugee camps.
For that matter, none of the international agencies in the country
has U.N. authority to protect the civil rights of internal
refugees. Almost a year after the MONUC office in Kindu sent a memo
in August 2003 to its headquarters in Kinshasa, detailing
suspicions of sexual exploitation, the London Independent
discovered action still hadn't been taken.
"We recognize that sexual exploitation and abuse is a problem in
some missions," said Jane Holl Lute, a U.N. assistant secretary
general, at a recent press conference. "It's obvious that the
measures we've had in place have not been adequate." Relief
organizations and human rights groups agree, describing as "urgent"
the need to protect young girls from U.N. militia and staff. As
Patrick Barbier, of Doctors Without Borders, told one newspaper:
"It is clear that the necessary steps to protect the displaced
population from violence and sexual exploitation have not been
followed."
Indeed, the international operation in Bunia, home to about 16,000
refugees, threatens to become another monument to U.N. paralysis
and failure. Investigators describe a "significant, widespread and
ongoing" pattern of abuse at the camp--an astonishing conclusion
given that many women are afraid to report sexual violence against
them. At least one senior official in charge of security in Bunia
is implicated in the scandal, and U.N. peacekeepers allegedly have
threatened investigators with retaliation. According to the
Economist, a U.N. probe is even considering the possibility that
MONUC has been infiltrated by "organized pedophiles who recruit
their friends."
The U.N. abuses are especially grievous in Congo, where sexual
violence against women and children has been a weapon of war
employed by most of the armies involved in the six-year-old
conflict. Called "Africa's world war," it has involved militias
from Angola, Namibia, Zimbabwe, Uganda, Rwanda, and Congo. Despite
a peace agreement reached in 2002, the fighting continues:
According to the International Rescue Committee, more than 31,000
civilians are dying a month from violence, disease, and famine;
tens of thousands remain in refugee camps, mostly women and
children. In Bunia alone, a U.N. Children's Fund (UNICEF) program
has treated 2,000 victims of sexual violence in recent
months.
Kofi Annan has insisted on "zero tolerance" of sexual exploitation
by peacekeepers, but U.N. rules apply only to U.N. employees;
military personnel fall under the jurisdiction of their own
governments. Only a few peacekeepers have been deported, and no
U.N. staff have been charged with criminal activity.
That's prompting tough talk from some U.S. officials about American
assistance for U.N. peacekeeping missions. The United States will
give $490 million next year to support about 62,000 military
personnel and civilian police serving in 16 U.N. operations around
the world. "Until the U.N. is willing to take decisive action and
take responsibility for these acts, we should look seriously at the
funding portion of the peace-keeping operations," says a foreign
policy aide to Kansas Republican Sam Brownback, who serves on the
Senate Appropriations Committee. "I don't know any other way to
force Annan to pay attention."
This latest U.N. episode, piled on top of the ongoing Oil for Food
scandal in Iraq, may help focus the mind. The sexual abuses
committed, or ignored, by U.N. personnel violate the institution's
Convention on the Rights of the Child, the Convention on the
Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, and the
principles enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
A 2002 U.N. report characterized the sexual exploitation issue as
"a betrayal of trust as well as a catastrophic failure of
protection."
Peacekeepers as predators? It's difficult to see how another U.N.
probe, proclamation, or committee report could reverse that
perception anytime soon.
Joe Loconte is
the William E. Simon Fellow in Religion at the Heritage Foundation
and editor of The End of Illusions: Religious Leaders Confront
Hitler's Gathering Storm.
First Appeared in the Weekly Standard