This weekend's arrest of 17 homegrown al Qaeda wannabes just across the border in Canada is a nightmarish reminder of the horrors that have been - and could be - right here at home again if we don't fully get our counterterrorism act together soon.
By many accounts, despite a ballooning budget and staff, the FBI
is still struggling to get its arms around its newly reinvigorated
counterror (CT) mission - a critical capability that could prevent
another 9/11.
John Gannon, a former CIA and Homeland Security official, told the
Senate in late April: "We still do not have a domestic-intelligence
service that can collect effectively against the terrorist threat
to the homeland or provide authoritative analysis of that
threat."
Many experts say that the competent collection and analysis of
domestic CT intelligence could have "connected the dots" and
prevented 9/11. Yet this still remains the weakest link in our
domestic fight in the War on Terror.
Experts contend that if President Bush hadn't taken the fight to
the terrorists in places like Afghanistan and Iraq, we'd have a
real terrorism problem here - one they believe the FBI couldn't
handle.
And what about the post-9/11 anthrax letters? The FBI still hasn't
closed those cases. What's more important: Digging up Jimmy Hoffa's
corpse on some Michigan farm, or preventing another deadly anthrax
attack? Priorities, puh-leez!
Another obvious sign of failure: The G-men still haven't developed
an accurate terrorist watch list. FBI Director Robert Mueller told
Congress it will be "some time" before that's done. That the bureau
has had to scrap its $500 million Trilogy computer system hasn't
helped, either.
So what's the problem?
First, there is the FBI's culture. The bureau has long considered
itself a law-enforcement outfit. Getting an executive suite in the
Hoover HQ building means cuffing and convicting crooks, not
penetrating and analyzing shadowy Islamic terrorist networks.
Insiders are concerned that the long-standing FBI "cop" mentality
of investigating a crime after it happens (i.e., reactive) isn't
translating well into a CT state of mind, which must prevent a
crime before it happens (i.e., predictive).
Personnel turnover has been a snag, too. Six - count 'em, six -
senior CT managers have left the bureau since 9/11. Granted, it's a
tough, thankless position, but the last one punched out after only
eight months in the job. Something is amiss . . .
The flight of key personnel to the outside slows the bureau's
much-needed CT transformation. Mueller says burnout and better pay
are key factors in the "brain drain" to cushy security chief jobs
at Fortune 500 companies.
In fairness, the G-men have made progress, too. The bureau
established the National Security Branch from the separate
counterterrorism, counterintelligence and intelligence divisions to
improve info sharing.
And the FBI has added 2,000 new intelligence agents, doubling their
ranks, dispersing them to Field Intelligence Groups in the FBI's 56
field offices - and established 120 Joint Terrorism Task Forces.
Both upgrades helped the FBI contribute (along with the Homeland
Security Department, the U.S. military, CIA and countless others)
to preventing another homeland terrorist strike. No small
achievement, by any measure.
And CT info is getting passed down to the local level, too,
according to Mueller. According to first responders,
information-sharing, while still far from perfect, is improving.
Over 6,000 local/ state police have been given access to classified
CT info.
On evidence, the FBI's is making only halting progress in balancing
its "Book 'em, Dano" law-enforcement culture with its "Get Osama"
counterterrorism mission. So what should be done?
First, Congress and Director of National Intelligence John
Negroponte must exercise rigorous oversight, pressuring the FBI to
fully embrace its CT mandate on par with battling crime. If the job
isn't getting done, heads should roll.
Second, don't create another CT agency, like the British MI-5. Keep
CT intel/law enforcement at FBI. The intel community is bloated
enough already - and MI-5 wasn't able to prevent last year's London
terror attacks, which killed more than 50 people.
Third, don't increase the Pentagon's or the CIA's domestic CT role.
Beyond civil-liberty concerns, their CT assignments should be
overseas, making sure foreign terrorists don't get to our shores.
Let FBI (and DHS) do domestic CT.
The idea that the FBI can't do domestic CT is hogwash. It
successfully caught spies, saboteurs and ran agents before and
during World War II. The mere notion that it can't do the job now
must have J. Edgar Hoover rolling over in his grave.
Peter
Brookes, a senior fellow at The Heritage
Foundation, is the author of "A Devil's Triangle: Terrorism, WMD
and Rogue States."
First appeared in the New York Post