by Dan Lips
The Omnibus package under consideration in the House this week includes legislative language that will lead to the elimination of the D.C. Opportunity Scholarship program. As the Washington Post wrote in an editorial today, the provision is "an ill-disguised bid to kill a program that gives some poor parents a choice regarding where their children go to school."
Ending the program would threaten to force 1,700 low-income children currently benefiting from the Opportunity Scholarship program back into D.C. public schools. In a new "you tube" video, Opportunity Scholarship recipients read a letter to President Obama, asking him to save their scholarships. The video also can be accessed through this picture:
For more information about the current debate over school choice
in Congress, see:
Putting Parents Last in
Education
Special interests are the reason Congress is taking a $14
million scholarship program away from poor
children.
By Dan Lips & Robert C. Enlow
February 25, 2009
Any doubts about congressional leaders' priorities on education
were erased Monday with the release of the new $450 billion omnibus
bill. It includes a provision to eliminate the D.C. Opportunity
Scholarship program, which is currently helping low-income children
attend private schools in the nation's capital.
If adopted, the measure will basically ensure that 1,700 of the
poorest children in D.C. are forced to leave their private schools
and transfer back into the District's low-performing and often
dangerous public schools. Angered scholarship parents may wonder
why Congress is moving so quickly to end this $14 million program
just as the federal government is showering money on Wall Street
and the auto companies.
But anyone who followed the recent debate over the so-called
stimulus package isn't surprised. That plan included $100 billion
in new funding for the Department of Education - a one-time
increase that's more than the department currently spends in a
year. Buried in the bill's thousands of pages was a rule that not a
dollar could be used to give children scholarships to attend
private school.
The message was clear: Special-interest groups, not parents, still
come first in the education debate. For years, blocking school
choice and ending the D.C. Opportunity Scholarship program has been
a priority for the teachers' unions and their advocates on Capitol
Hill. Now, 1,700 low-income children may become casualties in that
ongoing political war.
Consider what's at stake for these children. The District has one
of the most troubled public-school systems in the country. Despite
the system's spending more than $14,000 each year per student,
barely half of all students ever graduate high school. One out of
every eight D.C. students reported being assaulted or injured with
a deadly weapon during a recent school year. That's equal to the
percentage of D.C. eighth-graders who scored "proficient" in
reading on the National Assessment of Educational Progress.
Since 2004, the Opportunity Scholarship program has helped
thousands of the District's poorest children escape these public
schools.
Academic researchers evaluating the program have found that
parents of voucher students are more satisfied with their
children's schools. Initial evidence suggests that children who
were offered vouchers are performing better academically than their
peers who were not, though the results so far aren't statistically
significant.
More satisfied parents and test scores that appear to be rising -
not bad for a government program. Why, then, are congressional
leaders so intent on terminating this relatively tiny
expenditure?
A likely reason is the muscle that special-interest groups like
the National Education Association, the nation's largest teachers'
union, flex in American politics today. And that should concern
parents and students across the country, not just poor families in
D.C.
The harsh truth is that American education urgently needs the kind
of reform that $100 billion just won't buy. Millions of children
continue to pass through our nation's public schools without
receiving an education that prepares them to succeed and take
advantage of the opportunities of the 21st-century economy.
Whether we deliver on the promise that all children have equal
access to a quality education depends on whether elected officials
have the courage to stand up to entrenched interest groups. This
isn't about spending more money. This is about setting high
standards and holding students and schools accountable for results.
It's about changing the way we train, hire, and compensate our
teachers.
Most of all, it's about transferring power from government
bureaucracy to parents and school leaders, who are better
positioned to determine how children can best learn. Parents should
be free to choose the educational environment that works best for
their children, and school leaders should be empowered to pick the
curriculum and
Unfortunately, instead of embracing the change American education
needs, the congressional majority appears intent on continuing to
support the failed status quo. That's bad news for all American
children. But it's especially bad news for 1,700 poor kids in
Washington, D.C.
Dan Lips is a Senior Policy Analyst for education at the Heritage Foundation.