Houston Storm Shows Downside of Forced Electrification

COMMENTARY Energy

Houston Storm Shows Downside of Forced Electrification

May 28, 2024 2 min read
COMMENTARY BY
Diana Furchtgott-Roth

Director, Center for Energy, Climate, and Environment

Diana is Director of the Center for Energy, Climate and Environment and the Herbert and Joyce Morgan Fellow.
Photo taken on May 17, 2024 shows electricity facilities damaged by storms in northwestern Houston, Texas. Chen Chen / Xinhua / Getty Images

Key Takeaways

Houstonians with electric stoves can’t cook, those with electric water heaters lack hot water—and those with electric cars can’t charge them.

The Houston crisis dramatically illustrates that not only will forced electrification lead to higher energy prices, but it will reduce economic resilience.

Houston residents today, together with all Americans, need a resilient power grid that will continue to provide electricity during storms.

We live in a world with more and more devices that require charging, and nothing shows the downside of that better than the recent storm that hit Houston, where thousands of residents still lack power.

Houstonians with electric stoves can’t cook, those with electric water heaters lack hot water—and those with electric cars can’t charge them.

The range of an EV without electricity is zero. But President Joe Biden’s Environmental Protection Agency and Department of Transportation are requiring that 70% of new cars and 25% of new trucks sold in 2032 be electric. Imagine the state Houston would be in if the number of EVs on the road today met those standards.

Biden’s Energy Department has issued final regulations that most stoves sold must be electric by 2028, and most water heaters must be electric by 2029. If these rules were fully phased in, Houstonians would be worse off today. These appliances are not only more expensive, they don’t work without electricity, unlike natural gas stoves and water heaters.

>>> Even With New EV Tariffs, Biden’s Climate Agenda Benefits China

The latest report from the Institute of Energy Research, released earlier this month, shows that the United States has 4 quadrillion cubic feet of natural gas, enough for 130 years; 1.7 trillion barrels of oil, more than five times the reserves of Saudi Arabia, enough for 227 years; and 470 billion short tons of coal, enough for 485 years, and 50% more than Russia. These are all recoverable with current technology, and as technology advances, America’s resources will expand.

Although America has centuries of reserves, the Biden administration wants to use wind turbines and solar panels to power electricity. Electricity made from wind and solar power is intermittent, and is less resilient and reliable than continuous energy from nuclear, coal, and natural gas. Wind farms require backup natural-gas power plants to start up when the wind stops blowing, and solar arrays require battery storage for when the sun doesn’t shine.

The Houston crisis dramatically illustrates that not only will forced electrification lead to higher energy prices, but it will reduce economic resilience. Natural gas pipelines are buried underground, but electric transmission cables and towers are out in the open. That is why major storms lead to electricity blackouts but not natural-gas blackouts.

The Biden administration’s goal is for the forced electrification through wind and solar to reduce global temperatures. But even if America used no fossil fuels at all, starting now, this would make a difference of only 0.2 degrees Celsius by 2100, according to government models.

Costs of integrating renewables into America’s electricity grid underestimate the resilience needed for renewable infrastructure against storms, tornadoes, and hurricanes. The resiliency analysis does not fully address the considerable costs of reinforcing and repairing vulnerable wind turbines and solar panels.

>>> Green Housing Mandates Are Pushing Americans More Into the Red

Houston’s crisis is further proof that a sensible energy policy would overhaul America’s transmission and distribution systems, including burying power lines. Renewables strain the existing transmission system, leading to blackouts, as is becoming increasingly common in California. Environmental siting regulation limits the construction of new transmission lines.

Biden’s transition to renewable energy would require a fundamental re-engineering of America’s power grid. High levels of distributed solar energy would require replacing existing transmission and distribution equipment with expensive grid-forming inverters and controllable capacitators. The massive rollout’s costs are not fully accounted for.

Low-income households are disproportionately vulnerable to blackouts. Their electricity takes a longer time to restore, and they cannot purchase standalone generators that enabled some to keep power during the disruption.

Through multiple regulations the Biden administration is attempting impose electrification on Americans and to end the use of fossil fuels. But EVs, electric water heaters, and electric stoves don’t operate during blackouts. Houston residents today, together with all Americans, need a resilient power grid that will continue to provide electricity during storms.

This piece originally appeared in ArcaMax