Need proof that Washington lawmakers are out of step with the American people? Consider the farm bill, a Depression-era relic that heavily subsidizes America's agriculture.
Agriculture Committee members have been negotiating with the White House to cultivate a version that the president will sign. Expect a great harvest for everyone but conservatives: Many lawmakers are increasing subsidies to farmers who are benefiting from record crop prices.
According to my Heritage Foundation colleague Brian
Riedl, since the 2002 farm bill was considered, the price of rice
has gone up 281 percent, and wheat has risen 256 percent. Yet
negotiators want to keep rice subsidies at the same level as the
prior farm bill and actually increase subsidies for wheat
farmers.
Current farm policy sets no income limit for full-time farmers to
be eligible for farm subsidies. President Bush says subsidies
should be limited to those making less than $200,000 annually
(although he may accept a higher farmer income cap of $500,000).
Congress is considering setting the bar at $1 million.
Meanwhile, food prices are skyrocketing and American families are
hurting. A better farm policy would be to jettison all subsidies
and let the free market set farm prices.
Polar Bears
Who has the power to hunt and kill America's economic activity
with one simple bureaucratic regulation? Department of Interior
Secretary Dirk Kempthorne.
Because of a court order by federal judge Claudia Wilken of
California, Kempthorne has until May 15 to decide if the polar bear
should be covered by the Endangered Species Act. Radical
environmentalists argue that global warming is destroying the
bear's icy habitat.
The inconvenient truth is that the bears are thriving. Its numbers
have more than doubled in the past 30 years, and Canada (!)
recently refused to place the animal on its threatened species
list. In fact, Canadians allow 500 polar bears to be killed each
year, which hasn't discouraged a majority of the estimated 20,000
to 25,000 bears in the world from residing in Canada.
If Kempthorne complies, radical environmentalists will sprint into
court to pursue their economically debilitating global-warming
agenda. Left-wing judges will agree to block the building of new
power plants, curtail SUV use, and stifle every-day economic
activity. Conservatives, beware of the left using cute and cuddly
polar bears to use our courts to turn some of our most precious
freedoms into endangered species.
Native Hawaiians
Late last year, the House passed by a large margin a bill that
allows federal recognition of "Native Hawaiians" as a distinct
group, and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has promised it some
floor time. Known as the "Akaka Bill," it would establish a
governing body to represent Native Hawaiians in negotiations with
the federal and state governments. So much for equal protection.
Congress seems ready to create a new government based on the racial
or ethnic background of individuals.
The Akaka Bill would establish a government where only people who
can prove Native Hawaiian status would be allowed to vote and
participate. The average American would be revolted by the thought
of, say, an African-American Governing Authority, where people
would have to submit DNA evidence to be allowed the privileges and
immunities of membership. Yet it's somehow acceptable for Native
Hawaiians to have a race-based governing body to collect federal
cash and buy lands for the use of Native Hawaiians who pass the
race test. What happened to "all men" being "created equal"?
Entitlement Reform
Congress has largely ignored the explosion in spending under the
federal government's entitlement programs. In Fiscal Year 2007,
Washington ran a $163 billion deficit -- and entitlement programs
are the chief culprit. Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security are
projected to expand rapidly and create unsustainable
deficits.
Yet members of Congress can't even take baby steps to slow this
expansion. Look at how Congress responded to President Bush's seven
rules designed to curb certain Medicaid fraud and abuses. Medicaid
is a joint federal and state program that spent $338 billion in
taxpayer monies last year, and the president proposed reforms that
would save taxpayers $42.2 billion over the next 10 years.
Congress, though, is trying to block them.
Conservatives should encourage lawmakers to tackle entitlement
reform. If members lack the stomach for even modest reform, they
need quite a kick.
Brian Darling is
director of US Senate relations and congressional analyst at The
Heritage Foundation (heritage.org).
First appeared in Human Events