If IPCC Sea Level Numbers Aren’t Bad Enough, Try Tripling Them

COMMENTARY Environment

If IPCC Sea Level Numbers Aren’t Bad Enough, Try Tripling Them

Jul 22, 2011 1 min read
COMMENTARY BY

Former Senior Research Fellow, Labor Markets and Trade

David Kreutzer researched and wrote about labor markets and trade.

A recent study authored by Mark Crowell of the Federal Emergency Management Agency estimates that in the U.S., climate change will increase the area subject to flooding by 45 percent in 2100. But to get this number, the study used estimates of sea-level rise that were more than 200 percent higher than the estimates of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Even with its questionable temperature projections, the IPCC’s various projections of sea-level rise are between .18 and .59 meters (about 7 to 23 inches) (See chart above.). However, the Crowell study uses a range of 0.75 to 1.9 meters (about 2.5 to 6 feet).

Sea-level rise over the past several decades—in reality—has been closer to the low end of the IPCC projections. Though some researchers claim the rate will accelerate, lately it has slowed down.

So the rule for climate hysteria seems to be: Trumpet the infallibility of the IPCC when its numbers are scariest, but ignore the IPCC when somebody else has scarier predictions. What is more galling is to ignore the IPCC projections while implying that new research is still based on them, as the media coverage of the Crowell study does.

This piece originally appeared in The Daily Signal

Exclusive Offers

5 Shocking Cases of Election Fraud

Read real stories of fraudulent ballots, harvesting schemes, and more in this new eBook.

The Heritage Guide to the Constitution

Receive a clause-by-clause analysis of the Constitution with input from more than 100 scholars and legal experts.

The Real Costs of America’s Border Crisis

Learn the facts and help others understand just how bad illegal immigration is for America.