Last Monday, the FBI released its preliminary
annual
Uniform Crime Report for 2005. The numbers indicate crime may
be on the rise. For example, the total number of murders in America
increased by 4.8 percent. However, before the call goes out for the
federal government to spend more on traditional state and local
crime-fighting responsibilities, we need to put these numbers in
perspective.
First, these new FBI estimates are crime totals and do not adjust
for population growth. Obviously, more people likely would mean
more crime. The final Uniform Crime Report for 2005, due out this
fall, will adjust for population growth, which should reduce the
numbers somewhat.
Second, we need to make sure this small increase in total murders
represents a long-term trend, not an aberration. From 2002 to 2003,
the murder rate increased from 5.6 incidents per 100,000 residents
to 5.7. Yet, the murder rate in 2005 dropped to 5.5 incidents per
100,000 residents.
Third, numerous factors determine crime rates, many of which are
beyond government control. Before we know more, we should stick
with proven strategies. Pouring federal money into local law
enforcement is a proven loser.
What does work? Creative approaches by local police chiefs, such
as problem-oriented policing, in which local police devote
resources to areas where crime occurs frequently.
Another winning strategy: putting violent criminals behind bars
and keeping them there. In one study, researchers looked at 64
years of crime data, ending in 1994, and determined that a 10
percent increase in total prison population is associated with a
13-percent decrease in homicide, after controlling for
socioeconomic factors.
This doesn't mean we should throw every possible violator in
prison. Prison space is a scarce resource and should be treated as
such. But it does mean incarcerating our most serious offenders
first.
It's certainly not good news that the total number of murders in
America went up. But until we know more, we should resist the urge
to overreact. Just as the punishment must fit the crime, the
crime-fighting strategy must fit the situation.
David
Muhlhausen is a senior research analyst in the
Center for Data Analysis at The Heritage
Foundation.
First appeared in the National Review