Could it be true that democracy -- having been given a
good push by the Bush administration -- is breaking out in the
Middle East? The administration has said that with Afghanistan and
Iraq's elections as examples, we would see a benevolent domino
effect throughout the region. With the fall of Lebanon's
Syrian-backed government on Monday, after massive public protests
in reaction to the assassination of popular former Prime Minister
Rafiq Hariri, a new window on the future has been opened for the
Lebanese.
But those who follow public opinion in the Arab world also know
that a note of caution is in order, even as we should join
Lebanon's celebrations and support its future progress. (A note of
caution is always a safe recommendation when the subject is the
Middle East.) In a number of Arab countries, the most admired man
in the world is Osama bin Laden, and popular elections held today
could be disasters. Much groundwork needs to be done in this part
of the world before democracy will blossom.
Freedom of speech, religion and assembly, respect for human
rights, rule of law and the development of a democratic political
opposition are all steps on the road to democracy. In the majority
of Arab countries, including important U.S. allies, those
conditions are missing today. In the tough words of the State
Department's newly published 2004 Human Rights Report, for
instance, Saudi Arabia's record on human rights is "poor with
continuing serious problems, despite some progress," in effect not
much better than Iran's.
In the case of Lebanon, a long tough road lies ahead, but there
are real reasons for hope. Mr. Hariri was murdered Feb. 14 in a
horrendous car bombing that also killed 16 other people. It
provoked the biggest demonstrations that Lebanon has ever seen,
filling the streets of Beirut with thousands and thousands of
people. Significantly, the crowds included Syria's religiously
diverse groups, Christians, Sunni and Shi'ite Muslims and
Druze.
A businessman with a clear vision for the rebuilding of his
shattered country, which has been under Syrian occupation since the
late 1980s, Mr. Hariri had great plans for the reconstruction of
Beirut. Before its civil war and Syrian occupation, Beirut was
known as the Paris of the Middle East, a shining city of culture
and commerce.
A U.N. investigation into the Hariri assassination has begun, but
Lebanon's Syrian-backed government is widely believed to be behind
the crime. U.S. officials, like Secretary of State Condoleezza
Rice, have not hesitated to suggest that Syria itself may have been
involved. Though Mr. Hariri had worked with the Syrians in the
past, his recent "transgression" was that he had started calling
for the withdrawal of Syria's 15,000 troops.
Mr. Hariri is reported to have been an instigator of U.N. Security
Council Resolution 1559, passed in September, which calls on Syria
to withdraw its troops from Lebanon. In this, he actually managed
to bring the United States and France together on the U.N. Security
Council, a rare and remarkable feat. Based in Paris, Mr. Hariri was
a good friend of French President Jacques Chirac, going back to the
1980s, when Mr. Chirac was mayor of Paris.
On this unusual constellation of allies, the United States and
France, rests a good deal of promise for international support for
Lebanon's freedom and democratic developments. It also offers
ground for mutually beneficial trans-Atlantic cooperation founded
on a confluence of strategic interests.
France, as the former colonial power with long-standing interest
in Lebanon, would like to see the country develop. The United
States and our ally Israel want to deny Syrian-backed terrorists
groups, particularly the powerful Syrian and Iranian-backed Shi'ite
terrorist group Hezbollah, their bases in Southern Lebanon, where
they have operated against Israel and supported Palestinian
terrorism since the 1980s. In the estimation of some terrorism
experts, Hezbollah is a far greater threat than al Qaeda with
operations throughout the Middle East, the Americas and
Europe.
For Lebanon, a first step has been taken, but much of this story
remains to be played out. Lebanese President Emile Lahoud remains a
supporter of Syria. And while Syria has agreed to pull its troops
back to the western part of Lebanon, a complete withdrawal must
follow. And elections to a new government should come soon to avoid
a political vacuum. So far, though, let's rejoice with the
courageous Lebanese people in the new promise of their "cedar
revolution."
Helle Dale is
director of the Douglas and Sarah Allison Center for Foreign Policy
Studies of the Heritage Foundation.
First appeared in The Washington Times