Is Congress finally listening? For years now, ordinary Americans have voiced their discontent with policymaking in Washington. They've been especially dismayed with politicians' spendthrift ways regarding all matters, great and small.
The statistics are sobering: A 33 percent increase in overall
federal spending on President Bush's watch. Billions squandered on
wasteful farm subsidies. Hundreds of millions more proposed to
relocate an operating railroad and build a "bridge to nowhere" to
link the Alaskan mainland with an island of 50 people.
Conservatives have repeatedly raised the alarm. But maybe the need
for repetition isn't surprising: Anyone in business knows you don't
sell a product by mentioning it only once. You must keep reminding
people how important it is and explaining why they should value
your product instead of your competition's.
Public policy is the same way. Conservatives have the right
message, and we've spent years repeating it, citing specific
numbers and getting the public behind us. Now, lawmakers may be
taking notice.
On June 8, the Senate finally passed a supplemental spending bill
to pay for the war in Iraq and Hurricane Katrina cleanup. At one
point during negotiations, the measure was expected to cost more
than $105 billion, but in the bill they passed, senators agreed to
hold the line at $94.5 billion.
All told, they trimmed about $14 billion in pork-barrel projects,
including $4 billion for "farm disaster aid." The definition of a
"disaster" is clearly getting looser, since the Department of
Agriculture declared nearly 80 percent of all U.S. counties
"disaster areas" last year.
In another minor victory, on June 6 the Appropriations Committee
of the House of Representatives passed a spending bill that could
ensure the bridge to nowhere never gets built. Rep. Mark Kirk
(R-Ill.) added an amendment that would ban the spending of federal
money to design or build the bridge, or even to reimburse the state
for the project. "My amendment sends a strong signal to the
American people that the time for this expensive style of federal
spending has passed," Kirk said.
At the same time, lawmakers finally showed they won't be
railroaded anymore by Amtrak.
In the same spending bill that contains Kirk's amendment, the
House committee provided $900 million for Amtrak, the amount
President Bush wanted. That's a lot of money to spend on a
dysfunctional organization that struggles to make the trains run on
time. But it's far less than the $1.6 billion the railroad had
requested.
It's past time for Congress to put Amtrak on a strict budget. The
railroad already loses money every time a passenger steps on a
train. It's only logical that lawmakers force Amtrak management to
reduce operating costs and improve the quality of service --
critical goals that will be achieved only when the federal
government stops propping up Amtrak by bailing it out with taxpayer
dollars.
Lawmakers also stood up to the powerful air traffic controllers'
union. The controllers already average $173,000 a year in pay and
benefits, but their union wanted lawmakers to increase that. By a
narrow margin, the House voted to allow the FAA to reduce salaries
for new hires by 28 percent. Now, lawmakers should go further and
look at privatizing the controllers, a move that would save money
and improve service in the long run.
There's plenty left to do. In too many ways, the federal
government is like a car speeding toward a fiscal brick wall. The
crash is years off, but it's inevitable unless we steer the car in
a different direction.
Lawmakers have recently started to do just that. It's too early to
see if these steps toward fiscal sanity become a trend (especially
after election-year pressures abate) but the signs are encouraging.
Those who have taken these baby steps toward responsible
stewardship should be congratulated -- but also reminded that
they're still at the beginning of a long journey.
Edwin
Feulner is president of The Heritage Foundation
(heritage.org), a Washington-based public policy research institute
and co-author of the new book Getting
America Right.
First Appeared in the Chicago Sun-Times