The Battle Over DEI Is Far From Over

COMMENTARY Progressivism

The Battle Over DEI Is Far From Over

Jun 27, 2024 4 min read
COMMENTARY BY
Mike Gonzalez

Angeles T. Arredondo E Pluribus Unum Senior Fellow

Mike is the Angeles T. Arredondo E Pluribus Unum Senior Fellow at The Heritage Foundation.
Sen. JD Vance (R-OH) gestures while speaking during a news conference on Capitol Hill on May 22, 2024 in Washington, D.C. Kent Nishimura / Getty Images

Key Takeaways

Vance and Cloud’s bill takes a blowtorch to DEI. It would dismantle DEI programs, rescind President Joe Biden’s many DEI executive orders, etc.

A Biden administration rule has given the nation’s 574 federally recognized Indian tribes effective veto power over what museums can exhibit.

Stripping out DEI is a great, brave step. But watch what happens with the museums if you want to know who’s winning.

The struggle against ideologies that seek to divide America advances in fits and starts. This month we saw great progress in the introduction of a bill to ban diversity, equity, and inclusion mandates throughout the federal government. But it was a different story a week later when lawmakers were lobbing rhetorical softballs at the DEI-loving head of the Smithsonian.

The comprehensive Dismantle DEI Act, introduced in the Senate by Sen. J.D. Vance (R-OH) and in the House by Rep. Michael Cloud (R-TX) and co-sponsored by 20 other Republicans, systematically eliminates diversity, equity, and inclusion programs throughout the federal bureaucracy and among federal contractors.

That is not a small part of the economy. According to the U.S. Treasury, “federal spending was equal to 23% of the total gross domestic product (GDP), or economic activity, of the United States” in fiscal 2022.

Vance and Cloud’s bill takes a blowtorch to DEI. It would dismantle DEI programs (such as the “anti-racist” trainings that have cropped up at offices and schools and all other areas of American life), rescind President Joe Biden’s many DEI executive orders, outlaw DEI loyalty pledges, etc.

>>> How the State Department’s Discriminatory DEI Programs Undermine U.S. Diplomacy and Betray American Values

It has no chance of passing and being signed into law while the Democrats have the Senate and Biden is president. But it becomes an important stick in the ground. If former President Donald Trump is elected president in November, this bill should be his blueprint, something he already championed as president.

So far, so good. But DEI is just one front in the fight against ideologies that divide us mostly along racial and sexual lines, based on race and gender theories that are Marxist in their origin.

Another important front in the culture wars is that ultimate cultural institution: museums. They have become the battle theater of those who want to “decolonize” the culture — that is, strip it of any reverence for America. The decolonizers want to turn the museums into institutions propagating a cultural counternarrative.

The Smithsonian is, for better or for worse (it used to be for better, now it’s for worse), America’s museum. And while Republicans are giving signs that they finally get the DEI part, they are missing in action on the museum part.

Smithsonian Institution Secretary Lonnie Bunch’s hearing at the Senate Rules and Administration Committee on June 18 was really a replay of the mutual admiration society. Only one Republican showed up, Sen. Deb Fischer (R-NE), the ranking member, and her most probing question of Bunch was about the schedule for repatriating native art to tribes.

Bunch assured her that the Smithsonian Institution’s repatriation schedule is “very robust. … We want to be able to return what the communities really want.”

For those wondering what this is about, a Biden administration rule has given the nation’s 574 federally recognized Indian tribes effective veto power over what museums can exhibit. If they demand that a museum send back a cultural item, the museum will have to comply. New York’s American Museum of Natural History will close two halls with Indian exhibitions.

This is not something conservatives should want to expedite. They should, in fact, fight this nonsense.

There were no Republicans at the hearing asking about two new museums based on identity politics: the Latino and Women’s museums. The first has been criticized by myself and others as a “woke indoctrination factory” that aims to fill Hispanic Americans with grievances, and the second will be no better.

But there were Democrats heaping praise on the effort, and asking for more of the same. Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA) asked Bunch what the Smithsonian planned to do about the “African diaspora,” that is, Americans born in Africa, or who are the children of such immigrants. They encounter great success in America, but apparently the Smithsonian will have to also instill victimhood in them.

>>> DEI Doesn’t Work, Evidence Shows

The African diaspora “is really important” to the Smithsonian, Bunch assured Warner. To which Warner, not missing a multicultural beat, replied, “What are you doing on the South Asian diaspora?”

Bunch is a soft-spoken, likable individual, but he’s embraced all these ideologies. DEI, he has written, is “integral to excellence in museum practice. FULL STOP.” DEI, in fact, should “shape museums,” he added.

He was also an early and enthusiastic supporter of the Black Lives Matter organizations, which were set up by Marxists to transform society. In 2014, at the height of the BLM riots in Ferguson, Missouri, when Bunch was director of the National Museum of African American History and Culture, he assembled his curators and ordered them to collect BLM artifacts and create exhibits. BLM, he said, needed to organize for the long term and come up with legislative strategy.

In 2020, during the costliest riots in American history, he said that “protest is the highest form of patriotism.”

The fight to take back the considerable cultural ground that has been lost to the Left is too often derided as the “culture wars” by those who want to meet no resistance in their scorched earth advance. And it is obviously not for the weak-hearted. Stripping out DEI is a great, brave step. But watch what happens with the museums if you want to know who’s winning.

This piece originally appeared in Restoring America by the Washington Examiner