Trade Deficit Increase Not Necessarily a Bad Thing

COMMENTARY Trade

Trade Deficit Increase Not Necessarily a Bad Thing

Dec 11, 2012 1 min read
COMMENTARY BY

Former Jay Van Andel Senior Policy Analyst in Trade Policy

Bryan served as an advocate for free trade through his research at The Heritage Foundation.

The U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) announced today that imports and exports both declined in October while the overall trade deficit increased.

Reactions to the BEA report were misleading.

For example, the Associated Press reported: “A wider trade deficit acts as a drag on growth.”

In fact, U.S. trade deficits have almost always heralded a booming U.S. economy. And surpluses are no sure sign of health. Look no further than Greece, for example, which is running a trade surplus while its economy is in shambles.

Some reporters did a better job of explaining the trade deficit’s impact. Jeffry Bartash at MarketWatch reported: “Falling imports, meanwhile, reflect a softer U.S. economy.”

Bartash is right. Americans would benefit from a strong, fast-growing economy that gives us more dollars to spend—whether on domestically made products or on imports.

The bad news in today’s BEA report is not that the trade deficit increased but that exports and imports both declined. The ability to trade more—and to afford more imports—is a sign of economic strength, not weakness. Just ask people in Greece how that trade surplus is working out for them.

This piece originally appeared in The Daily Signal

Exclusive Offers

5 Shocking Cases of Election Fraud

Read real stories of fraudulent ballots, harvesting schemes, and more in this new eBook.

The Heritage Guide to the Constitution

Receive a clause-by-clause analysis of the Constitution with input from more than 100 scholars and legal experts.

The Real Costs of America’s Border Crisis

Learn the facts and help others understand just how bad illegal immigration is for America.