Trade, Not Aid, Is Best Course for G-8 Ag Policy

COMMENTARY Trade

Trade, Not Aid, Is Best Course for G-8 Ag Policy

Jul 10, 2009 2 min read
COMMENTARY BY

Former Research Fellow For Economic Freedom and Growth

James M. Roberts' primary responsibility was to edit the Rule of Law and Monetary Freedom sections of Index of Economic Freedom.

Tourists might buy souvenirs, but President Obama is seeking “deliverables” he can bring home to convince Americans that the millions of their tax dollars spent to send the huge U.S. delegation to the G-8 Meeting in Italy this week was money well spent. So, he has been leaning on other G-8 leaders to support his plan to provide new development assistance funds for programs in poor countries in Africa and elsewhere to help farmers learn how to grow more food. No doubt the President would also like to travel from Italy to Ghana today bearing a gift of fresh foreign aid cash.

Defenders of big government programs such as Jeffery Sachs have already weighed in supporting Obama’s $20 billion “Agriculture Initiative,” which would provide “widespread subsidies for fertilizer…high-yielding seeds,…and agricultural extension services.” Sachs claims that such assistance can dramatically increase food production.

The bad news is that traditional and stale old foreign aid programs like this one don’t work very well, are expensive to implement, and take years before they might help even a few people. Frequent foreign aid critic and economist William Easterly warns Obama to “study the past to avoid repeating it. ‘The curse of aid is that they never learn from history,’” Professor Easterly said. “They need to go back and realize a lot of things promised today have been promised before.”

A better idea would be for President Obama to push his G-8 colleagues to reduce their countries’ agricultural market barriers and subsidies by the equivalent of $15 billion. G-8 taxpayers would thereby avoid the burden of yet more wasteful government spending, while tangible benefits to struggling agricultural producers in the Third World would be guaranteed. Of course, if Obama chose this market-friendly and more efficient private sector option, he wouldn’t be able to show up in Ghana today with promises of U.S. taxpayer cash.

Much as U.S. politicians are using the massive $787 billion “stimulus” money passed by Congress in February to win friends and influence people in U.S. congressional districts here at home, the President is using promises of aid to win allies abroad. However, the real way to earn the friendship of developing countries in Africa and elsewhere is to offer them the access to developed country agricultural commodity markets in the U.S., Europe, Japan, and elsewhere that they have been seeking for decades.

This piece originally appeared in The Daily Signal

Exclusive Offers

5 Shocking Cases of Election Fraud

Read real stories of fraudulent ballots, harvesting schemes, and more in this new eBook.

The Heritage Guide to the Constitution

Receive a clause-by-clause analysis of the Constitution with input from more than 100 scholars and legal experts.

The Real Costs of America’s Border Crisis

Learn the facts and help others understand just how bad illegal immigration is for America.