Scrutinizing the Social Cost of Carbon: Comment to the Energy Department

COMMENTARY Climate

Scrutinizing the Social Cost of Carbon: Comment to the Energy Department

Sep 16, 2013 1 min read
COMMENTARY BY

Former Senior Research Fellow, Labor Markets and Trade

David Kreutzer researched and wrote about labor markets and trade.

On September 16, Heritage analysts David Kreutzer and Kevin Dayaratna sent a request to the Department of Energy requesting that a recent rule incorporating an updated Social Cost of Carbon be opened for additional comments. The Social Cost of Carbon (SCC) is a monetary value measuring the purported damages from each ton of emitted carbon dioxide. Kreutzer and Dayaratna argue that the sensitivity of this value to various assumptions and the vagueness of critical values render the estimate of the SCC unsuited for regulatory cost-benefit analysis. For instance, Kreutzer and Dayaratna show that the omission of estimates using a 7-percent discount rate (a rate stipulated by the Office of Management and Budget) changes the value of the SCC by more than 1,000 percent in some cases. Read the request below.

In an additional request for reconsideration of the value of the SCC, Nicolas Loris explains in more detail fundamental problems with the social cost of carbon.

Comment to EPA on the Social Cost of Carbon, Sept. 16, 2013 by The Heritage Foundation on Scribd

 

This piece originally appeared in The Daily Signal

Exclusive Offers

5 Shocking Cases of Election Fraud

Read real stories of fraudulent ballots, harvesting schemes, and more in this new eBook.

The Heritage Guide to the Constitution

Receive a clause-by-clause analysis of the Constitution with input from more than 100 scholars and legal experts.

The Real Costs of America’s Border Crisis

Learn the facts and help others understand just how bad illegal immigration is for America.