How heartless can you get? How low can you sink? If you are a
Hollywood liberal you may sink low enough to attack a 92-year-old
man in the late stages of Alzheimer's disease and even make fun of
the devoted wife who is nursing him through his final years. This
is surely one of the greatest tragic ordeals that life can inflict
on two human beings.
The two-part mini-series "The Reagans," which was planned to be
have shown on Nov. 16 and 18 on CBS, demonstrates that even 20
years after Ronald Reagan left office, some people still can't
stand the former president. Liberals continue to dismiss Mr. Reagan
as an "amiable fool" -- at best - and still cannot fathom why
Americans elected Mr. Reagan in landslide victories. These are the
same people who usually claim tolerance and compassion for their
side, you know, the Barbara Streisand crowd, but who often fail to
display either when it comes to people they oppose
politically.
Miss Streisand, of course, considers herself somewhat of a
political force. The mini-series is being produced by two of her
frequent collaborators. Indeed, it is her husband who plays
President Reagan. By some accounts, she has been on the set every
day of the filming.
The tone of the production, according to accounts by those who have
seen promotional clips, ranges from the farcical and to the
insulting. Mr. Reagan as a bigot against people with AIDS, rough
character who swears at his people. His wife is portrayed as a
caricature of a shrew, screaming and dictatorial.
Particularly controversial is a scene that suggests that Mr. Reagan
displayed symptoms of Alzheimer's as early as 1985, nine years
before the actual diagnosis of his disease. That this would have
had consequences for the Reagan Presidency is obvious - were it
true, which it is not. Mrs. Reagan has called it pure
fabrication.
Due to massive negative publicity, CBS is considering canceling the
series, which would be the decent thing to do. (The network may
sell it to Showtime, which is not a whole lot better.)
Last Friday, the Republican National Committee launched a protest
with CBS president, Leslie Moonves, over the series' historical
inaccuracies. In a letter, RNC Chairman Ed Gillespie correctly
wrote, "Those graduating from college this year were only about
five years old when President Reagan left office, and this
broadcast will have significant impact on their understanding."
That's exactly the point. In this electronic media age, fiction and
history only too easily becomes confused.
Why does this smear come now, so many years after Mr. Reagan left
office? One reason may well be that the reputation of the 40th
president has been steadily on the rise, as one book after another
has illuminated Mr. Reagan's intelligence as a politician and his
personal character. One important contribution was "Reagan in His
Own Words," published on his 90th birthday, which in Mr. Reagan's
own writings shows him to be an elegant writer and astute
thinker.
In the same vein, "How Ronald Reagan Changed My Life," by former
Reagan speechwriter and Hoover Institution fellow Peter Robinson
makes for a great antidote to "The Reagans." It focuses admiringly
on the public role of the president as a man of principle and as
observed first hand by a young and inexperienced member of his
staff. Mr. Robin's most important contribution was Mr. Reagan's
speech given in Berlin in 1987 when he threw down his famous
challenge to the leader of the Soviet Union: "Mr. Gorbachev, open
this gate! Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall." Just like Mr.
Reagan's other most memorable speeches, it was one that the State
Department and the National Security Council hated and fought all
the way. The president liked it and overruled them all.
Equally importantly, the book describes the personal lesson that
Mr. Robinson learned from watching Ronald and Nancy Reagan
together, a lesson in total personal dedication. One scene that
stands out describes Mr. Reagan catching a glimpse of the first
lady in a window in the White House as he is giving a speech in the
Rose Garden. "He beamed. She waved. He waved - then had everyone in
the Rose Garden turn around and wave, too." Then the President
picked up his pace, appearing more involved and energetic. A smile
and a wave from his wife. They were all Reagan needed."
One imagines that this is still true, more importantly today than
ever.
Helle Daleis Deputy Director of The Kathryn and Shelby Cullom Davis Institute for International Studies at The Heritage Foundation.
First Appeared in Washington Times